ESASO classification relevance in the diagnosis and evolution in diabetic macular edema patients after dexamethasone implant treatment

Almudena Moreno-Martínez, Cristina Blanco-Marchite, Fernando Andres-Pretel, Francisco López-Martínez, Antonio Donate-Tercero, Eva González-Aquino, Carlos Cava-Valenciano, Giacomo Panozzo, Sergio Copete
{"title":"ESASO classification relevance in the diagnosis and evolution in diabetic macular edema patients after dexamethasone implant treatment","authors":"Almudena Moreno-Martínez, Cristina Blanco-Marchite, Fernando Andres-Pretel, Francisco López-Martínez, Antonio Donate-Tercero, Eva González-Aquino, Carlos Cava-Valenciano, Giacomo Panozzo, Sergio Copete","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06473-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess the clinical relevance of The European School for Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology (ESASO) classification in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after their first dexamethasone implant (DEXI) treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Retrospective real-world study conducted on consecutive DME patients who underwent DEXI treatment and were controlled at month-2. Subjects were initially classified according to the ESASO classification stages. The outcomes were anatomical biomarkers with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 128 patients were classified according to ESASO classification stages as early (7; 5.5%), advanced (100; 78.1%), and severe (21; 16.4%). At baseline, there were significant differences between stages in BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), and tomography anatomical biomarkers (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Initial BCVA (logMAR) was 0.33 ± 0.10, 0.58 ± 0.34, and 0.71 ± 0.35 in the early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). At month-2, BCVA was 0.17 ± 0.15, 0.46 ± 0.29, and 0.69 ± 0.27 in those classified as early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively. At month-2, DME was resolved or improved in 6 (85.7%), 60 (60%), and 12 (60%) patients classified as early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>There was a good correlation between BCVA and ESASO classification stages. Patients in the severe stage did not achieve visual acuity improvement over the study period.</p>","PeriodicalId":12748,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06473-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the clinical relevance of The European School for Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology (ESASO) classification in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after their first dexamethasone implant (DEXI) treatment.

Methods

Retrospective real-world study conducted on consecutive DME patients who underwent DEXI treatment and were controlled at month-2. Subjects were initially classified according to the ESASO classification stages. The outcomes were anatomical biomarkers with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

Results

A total of 128 patients were classified according to ESASO classification stages as early (7; 5.5%), advanced (100; 78.1%), and severe (21; 16.4%). At baseline, there were significant differences between stages in BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), and tomography anatomical biomarkers (p < 0.05). Initial BCVA (logMAR) was 0.33 ± 0.10, 0.58 ± 0.34, and 0.71 ± 0.35 in the early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively (p < 0.05). At month-2, BCVA was 0.17 ± 0.15, 0.46 ± 0.29, and 0.69 ± 0.27 in those classified as early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively. At month-2, DME was resolved or improved in 6 (85.7%), 60 (60%), and 12 (60%) patients classified as early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively.

Conclusions

There was a good correlation between BCVA and ESASO classification stages. Patients in the severe stage did not achieve visual acuity improvement over the study period.

Abstract Image

ESASO分类与地塞米松植入治疗后糖尿病黄斑水肿患者的诊断和病情发展的相关性
目的 评估欧洲眼科高等研究学院(ESASO)对首次接受地塞米松植入剂(DEXI)治疗后的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者进行分期的临床意义。研究对象最初根据 ESASO 分级进行分类。结果 共有128名患者根据ESASO分期被分为早期(7人,占5.5%)、晚期(100人,占78.1%)和重度(21人,占16.4%)。基线时,各分期在 BCVA、黄斑中心厚度 (CMT) 和断层扫描解剖生物标记物方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。早期、晚期和重度患者的初始 BCVA(logMAR)分别为 0.33 ± 0.10、0.58 ± 0.34 和 0.71 ± 0.35(p < 0.05)。第 2 个月时,早期、晚期和重度患者的 BCVA 分别为 0.17 ± 0.15、0.46 ± 0.29 和 0.69 ± 0.27。第 2 个月时,早期、晚期和重度患者中分别有 6 人(85.7%)、60 人(60%)和 12 人(60%)的 DME 得到缓解或改善。重度患者在研究期间视力没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信