Inequalities in sexual and reproductive outcomes among women aged 16–24 in England (2012–2019)

Danielle Solomon, Jo Gibbs, Fiona Burns, Hamish Mohammed, Stephanie J Migchelsen, Caroline A Sabin
{"title":"Inequalities in sexual and reproductive outcomes among women aged 16–24 in England (2012–2019)","authors":"Danielle Solomon, Jo Gibbs, Fiona Burns, Hamish Mohammed, Stephanie J Migchelsen, Caroline A Sabin","doi":"10.1136/jech-2023-220835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Women aged 16–24 in England have a high burden of sexual and reproductive morbidity, with particularly poor outcomes among people living in more deprived areas (including racially minoritised populations). This analysis used national data to examine the disparities within sexual and reproductive outcomes among this population and to assess whether the patterns of inequality were consistent across all outcomes. Methods Within this ecological study, univariable and multivariable Poisson regression analyses of neighbourhood-level data from national data sets were carried out to investigate the relationships of deprivation and ethnicity with each of six dependent variables: gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing rates, gonorrhoea and chlamydia test positivity rates, and abortion and repeat abortion rates. Results When comparing Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) decile 1 (most deprived) and IMD decile 10 (least deprived), chlamydia (RR 0.65) and gonorrhoea (0.79) testing rates, chlamydia (0.70) and gonorrhoea (0.34) positivity rates, abortion rates (0.45) and repeat abortion rates (0.72) were consistently lower in IMD decile 10 (least deprived). Similarly, chlamydia (RR 1.24) and gonorrhoea positivity rates (1.92) and repeat abortion rates (1.31) were higher among black women than white women. Results were similar when both ethnicity and deprivation were incorporated into multivariable analyses. Conclusion We found similar patterns of outcome inequality across a range of sexual and reproductive outcomes, despite multiple differences in the drivers of each outcome. Our analysis suggests that there are broad structural causes of inequality across sexual and reproductive health that particularly impact the health of deprived and black populations. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data used in this analysis are held by the Department of Health and Social Care and the UK Health Security Agency, and as such are not publicly available.","PeriodicalId":15778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-220835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Women aged 16–24 in England have a high burden of sexual and reproductive morbidity, with particularly poor outcomes among people living in more deprived areas (including racially minoritised populations). This analysis used national data to examine the disparities within sexual and reproductive outcomes among this population and to assess whether the patterns of inequality were consistent across all outcomes. Methods Within this ecological study, univariable and multivariable Poisson regression analyses of neighbourhood-level data from national data sets were carried out to investigate the relationships of deprivation and ethnicity with each of six dependent variables: gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing rates, gonorrhoea and chlamydia test positivity rates, and abortion and repeat abortion rates. Results When comparing Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) decile 1 (most deprived) and IMD decile 10 (least deprived), chlamydia (RR 0.65) and gonorrhoea (0.79) testing rates, chlamydia (0.70) and gonorrhoea (0.34) positivity rates, abortion rates (0.45) and repeat abortion rates (0.72) were consistently lower in IMD decile 10 (least deprived). Similarly, chlamydia (RR 1.24) and gonorrhoea positivity rates (1.92) and repeat abortion rates (1.31) were higher among black women than white women. Results were similar when both ethnicity and deprivation were incorporated into multivariable analyses. Conclusion We found similar patterns of outcome inequality across a range of sexual and reproductive outcomes, despite multiple differences in the drivers of each outcome. Our analysis suggests that there are broad structural causes of inequality across sexual and reproductive health that particularly impact the health of deprived and black populations. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data used in this analysis are held by the Department of Health and Social Care and the UK Health Security Agency, and as such are not publicly available.
英格兰 16-24 岁女性在性与生殖结果方面的不平等(2012-2019 年)
背景 英国 16-24 岁女性的性疾病和生殖疾病发病率较高,生活在较贫困地区的人群(包括少数种族人群)的发病率尤其高。本分析使用全国性数据来研究这一人群在性和生殖结果方面的差异,并评估所有结果的不平等模式是否一致。方法 在这项生态学研究中,对全国数据集中的邻近地区数据进行了单变量和多变量泊松回归分析,以研究贫困和种族与以下六个因变量之间的关系:淋病和衣原体检测率、淋病和衣原体检测阳性率、人工流产率和重复人工流产率。结果 比较多重贫困指数第 1 十分位数(最贫困)和第 10 十分位数(最不贫困),衣原体(RR 0.65)和淋病(0.79)检测率、衣原体(0.70)和淋病(0.34)阳性率、人工流产率(0.45)和重复人工流产率(0.72)在多重贫困指数第 10 十分位数(最不贫困)一直较低。同样,黑人妇女的衣原体阳性率(RR 1.24)、淋病阳性率(1.92)和重复流产率(1.31)均高于白人妇女。如果将种族和贫困程度纳入多变量分析,结果也类似。结论 我们发现,尽管每种结果的驱动因素存在多种差异,但在一系列性和生殖结果中,结果不平等的模式相似。我们的分析表明,造成性健康和生殖健康不平等的广泛结构性原因尤其影响了贫困人口和黑人的健康。数据可能来自第三方,不对外公开。本分析中使用的数据由英国卫生与社会关怀部和英国卫生安全局掌握,因此不对外公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信