Comparative analysis of joint distribution models for tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters in probabilistic coastal hazard analysis

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ziyue Liu, Meredith L. Carr, Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo, Luke A. Aucoin, Madison C. Yawn, Michelle T. Bensi
{"title":"Comparative analysis of joint distribution models for tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters in probabilistic coastal hazard analysis","authors":"Ziyue Liu, Meredith L. Carr, Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo, Luke A. Aucoin, Madison C. Yawn, Michelle T. Bensi","doi":"10.1007/s00477-023-02652-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In probabilistic coastal hazard assessments based on the Joint Probability Method, historical storm data is used to build distribution models of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters (i.e., central pressure deficit, forward velocity, radius of maximum wind, and heading direction). Recent models have used a range of assumptions regarding the dependence structure between these random variables. This research investigates the performance of a series of joint distribution models based on assumptions of parameter independence, partial-dependence (i.e., dependence between only central pressure deficit and radius of maximum wind), and full dependence (i.e., dependence between each pair of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters). Full dependence models consider a range of copula models, such as the Gaussian copula and vine copulas that combine linear-circular copulas with Gaussian or Frank copulas. The consideration of linear-circular copulas allows for the characterization of correlation between linear variables (e.g., central pressure deficit) and circular variables (e.g., heading direction). The sensitivity of the results to different joint distribution models is assessed by comparing hazard curves at representative locations in New Orleans, LA (USA). The stability of hazard curves generated using a Gaussian copula considering variation in the selection of the zero-degree convention is also assessed. The tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind associated with various copula models are also compared using estimated conditional probability. It is found that the linear-circular Frank vine copula model improve the stability of hazard curves and maximize tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind. However, the meta-Gaussian copula model exhibits performance within this study region that was generally consistent with the tested vine copulas and have the advantage of being easier to implement.</p>","PeriodicalId":21987,"journal":{"name":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02652-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In probabilistic coastal hazard assessments based on the Joint Probability Method, historical storm data is used to build distribution models of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters (i.e., central pressure deficit, forward velocity, radius of maximum wind, and heading direction). Recent models have used a range of assumptions regarding the dependence structure between these random variables. This research investigates the performance of a series of joint distribution models based on assumptions of parameter independence, partial-dependence (i.e., dependence between only central pressure deficit and radius of maximum wind), and full dependence (i.e., dependence between each pair of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters). Full dependence models consider a range of copula models, such as the Gaussian copula and vine copulas that combine linear-circular copulas with Gaussian or Frank copulas. The consideration of linear-circular copulas allows for the characterization of correlation between linear variables (e.g., central pressure deficit) and circular variables (e.g., heading direction). The sensitivity of the results to different joint distribution models is assessed by comparing hazard curves at representative locations in New Orleans, LA (USA). The stability of hazard curves generated using a Gaussian copula considering variation in the selection of the zero-degree convention is also assessed. The tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind associated with various copula models are also compared using estimated conditional probability. It is found that the linear-circular Frank vine copula model improve the stability of hazard curves and maximize tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind. However, the meta-Gaussian copula model exhibits performance within this study region that was generally consistent with the tested vine copulas and have the advantage of being easier to implement.

沿海灾害概率分析中热带气旋大气参数联合分布模型的比较分析
在以联合概率法为基础的沿岸灾害概率评估中,历史风暴数据被用来建立热带气旋大 气参数(即中心气压不足、前进速度、最大风半径和航向)的分布模式。最近的模型对这些随机变量之间的依赖结构使用了一系列假设。本研究调查了一系列基于参数独立性、部分依赖性(即仅中心气压不足和最大风半径之间的依赖性)和完全依赖性(即每对热带气旋大气参数之间的依赖性)假设的联合分布模型的性能。全依赖模式考虑了一系列共线模式,如高斯共线模式和将线性-圆形共线模式与高斯或弗兰克共线模式相结合的藤蔓共线模式。考虑线性-圆形共线关系可以确定线性变量(如中心压力不足)和圆形变量(如航向)之间的相关性。通过比较美国洛杉矶新奥尔良代表性地点的危险曲线,评估了结果对不同联合分布模型的敏感性。此外,还评估了使用高斯共线公式生成的危险曲线的稳定性,其中考虑到了零度公约选择的变化。此外,还使用估计的条件概率比较了与各种 copula 模型相关的大中心气压亏损和大最大风半径之间的尾部相关性。结果发现,线性-圆形弗兰克藤蔓 copula 模型提高了危险曲线的稳定性,并最大化了大中心气压亏损和大半径最大风之间的尾部依赖性。不过,元高斯共线模型在本研究区域内的表现与测试过的藤蔓共线模型基本一致,并且具有更易于实施的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA) will publish research papers, reviews and technical notes on stochastic and probabilistic approaches to environmental sciences and engineering, including interactions of earth and atmospheric environments with people and ecosystems. The basic idea is to bring together research papers on stochastic modelling in various fields of environmental sciences and to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas, for communicating on issues that cut across disciplinary barriers, and for the dissemination of stochastic techniques used in different fields to the community of interested researchers. Original contributions will be considered dealing with modelling (theoretical and computational), measurements and instrumentation in one or more of the following topical areas: - Spatiotemporal analysis and mapping of natural processes. - Enviroinformatics. - Environmental risk assessment, reliability analysis and decision making. - Surface and subsurface hydrology and hydraulics. - Multiphase porous media domains and contaminant transport modelling. - Hazardous waste site characterization. - Stochastic turbulence and random hydrodynamic fields. - Chaotic and fractal systems. - Random waves and seafloor morphology. - Stochastic atmospheric and climate processes. - Air pollution and quality assessment research. - Modern geostatistics. - Mechanisms of pollutant formation, emission, exposure and absorption. - Physical, chemical and biological analysis of human exposure from single and multiple media and routes; control and protection. - Bioinformatics. - Probabilistic methods in ecology and population biology. - Epidemiological investigations. - Models using stochastic differential equations stochastic or partial differential equations. - Hazardous waste site characterization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信