Application of Multi-Department Cooperation, Intelligent Prevention, and Supervision to Reduce the Incidence of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections

IF 0.9 4区 医学
Chuanfang Wu, Fan Dai, Donghua Yang, Xin You, Chuang Tan
{"title":"Application of Multi-Department Cooperation, Intelligent Prevention, and Supervision to Reduce the Incidence of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections","authors":"Chuanfang Wu, Fan Dai, Donghua Yang, Xin You, Chuang Tan","doi":"10.1007/s12288-024-01760-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) can result in worse outcomes and high hospitalization cost for patients. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of multi-department cooperation, intelligent prevention, and supervision (MDCIPS) in reducing the incidence of CLABSIs and improving the clinical outcomes of the patients. Key issues were identified through a literature review and survey on the status quo. A MDCIPS model was thus built. A total of 440 patients with indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) were enrolled in the study. The control group (<i>n</i> = 219) received conventional infection-control managements, while the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 221) received MDCIPS interventions in addition to conventional infection-control managements. The number of CLABSIs patients, incidence of CLABSIs, average length of hospital stay, average total hospitalization cost, and disease outcomes were compared between the two groups. The intervention group had a significant reduction in the number and incidence of CLABSIs (0[0%] vs. 4[1.33%], <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Two of the four patients with CLABSIs in the control group died. The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the control group than the intervention group (17 days vs. 13 days, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). The average hospitalization cost in the control group was much higher than that in the intervention group (92.8 thousand yuan vs. 65.2 thousand yuan, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Patient outcome was improved in the intervention group than the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.001). In summary, the MDCIPS model effectively reduces the incidence of CLABSIs, alleviates the patients’ economic burden, and improves the clinical outcomes of the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13314,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-024-01760-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) can result in worse outcomes and high hospitalization cost for patients. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of multi-department cooperation, intelligent prevention, and supervision (MDCIPS) in reducing the incidence of CLABSIs and improving the clinical outcomes of the patients. Key issues were identified through a literature review and survey on the status quo. A MDCIPS model was thus built. A total of 440 patients with indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) were enrolled in the study. The control group (n = 219) received conventional infection-control managements, while the intervention group (n = 221) received MDCIPS interventions in addition to conventional infection-control managements. The number of CLABSIs patients, incidence of CLABSIs, average length of hospital stay, average total hospitalization cost, and disease outcomes were compared between the two groups. The intervention group had a significant reduction in the number and incidence of CLABSIs (0[0%] vs. 4[1.33%], P < 0.05). Two of the four patients with CLABSIs in the control group died. The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the control group than the intervention group (17 days vs. 13 days, P < 0.001). The average hospitalization cost in the control group was much higher than that in the intervention group (92.8 thousand yuan vs. 65.2 thousand yuan, P < 0.001). Patient outcome was improved in the intervention group than the control group (P = 0.001). In summary, the MDCIPS model effectively reduces the incidence of CLABSIs, alleviates the patients’ economic burden, and improves the clinical outcomes of the patients.

应用多部门合作、智能预防和监督降低中心静脉相关血流感染的发生率
中心静脉相关性血流感染(CLABSIs)会导致患者的预后更差,住院费用更高。本研究旨在评估多部门合作、智能预防和监督(MDCIPS)在降低 CLABSIs 发生率和改善患者临床疗效方面的效果。通过文献综述和现状调查,确定了关键问题。由此建立了一个 MDCIPS 模型。共有 440 名留置中心静脉导管 (CVC) 的患者参与了研究。对照组(219 人)接受常规感染控制管理,而干预组(221 人)则在常规感染控制管理的基础上接受 MDCIPS 干预。两组的 CLABSIs 患者人数、CLABSIs 发生率、平均住院时间、平均住院总费用和疾病预后进行了比较。干预组的 CLABSIs 数量和发生率明显降低(0[0%] vs. 4[1.33%],P < 0.05)。对照组的四名 CLABSIs 患者中有两人死亡。对照组的平均住院时间明显长于干预组(17 天 vs. 13 天,P < 0.001)。对照组的平均住院费用远高于干预组(9.28 万元对 6.52 万元,P < 0.001)。干预组患者的疗效优于对照组(P = 0.001)。总之,MDCIPS 模式有效降低了 CLABSIs 的发生率,减轻了患者的经济负担,改善了患者的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion is a medium for propagating and exchanging ideas within the medical community. It publishes peer-reviewed articles on a variety of aspects of clinical hematology, laboratory hematology and hemato-oncology. The journal exists to encourage scientific investigation in the study of blood in health and in disease; to promote and foster the exchange and diffusion of knowledge relating to blood and blood-forming tissues; and to provide a forum for discussion of hematological subjects on a national scale. The Journal is the official publication of The Indian Society of Hematology & Blood Transfusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信