Perceptions and dilemmas around cyber-security in a Spanish research center after a cyber-attack

IF 2.4 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Joaquín Navajas-Adán, Eulàlia Badia-Gelabert, Laura Jiménez-Saurina, Mª Jesús Marijuán-Martín, Rafael Mayo-García
{"title":"Perceptions and dilemmas around cyber-security in a Spanish research center after a cyber-attack","authors":"Joaquín Navajas-Adán, Eulàlia Badia-Gelabert, Laura Jiménez-Saurina, Mª Jesús Marijuán-Martín, Rafael Mayo-García","doi":"10.1007/s10207-024-00847-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Information and Communication Technologies and Internet networks are present in all aspects of social reality and are essential elements in research, development and innovation centers (R&amp;D&amp;I). Cyber-security is crucial for the progress of the research activities developed in these centers, especially given the exponential growth of cyber-attacks and incidents. The present study aims to assess from a socio-technical approach, how a serious cyber-attack on a Spanish research center has affected staff’s perceptions of information and communication systems (ICT) security. This study employed a mixed-methods research strategy, combining quantitative and qualitative methods to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of ICT security perceptions among employees. First a quantitative scale was administered to 1,321 employees 3 years before the cyber-attack and 4 months afterward, to measure ICT security perceptions. Then, qualitative techniques (semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and micro-ethnography) were applied to gain a deeper understanding of the arguments underpinning cyber-security at the center after the attack. The results show that the event had an impact on employees’ perceptions, increasing the perceived importance of ICT security, with positive behavioral changes noted, but with doubts about their sustainability over time. Also, the need for cyber-security governance was critically contrasted with organizational reality. Finally, the compatibility of science and cyber-security was a central dilemma, which seems to confront antagonistic poles (research and security ICT) and justify the non-compliance with security protocols by part of the staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":50316,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Security","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-024-00847-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information and Communication Technologies and Internet networks are present in all aspects of social reality and are essential elements in research, development and innovation centers (R&D&I). Cyber-security is crucial for the progress of the research activities developed in these centers, especially given the exponential growth of cyber-attacks and incidents. The present study aims to assess from a socio-technical approach, how a serious cyber-attack on a Spanish research center has affected staff’s perceptions of information and communication systems (ICT) security. This study employed a mixed-methods research strategy, combining quantitative and qualitative methods to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of ICT security perceptions among employees. First a quantitative scale was administered to 1,321 employees 3 years before the cyber-attack and 4 months afterward, to measure ICT security perceptions. Then, qualitative techniques (semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and micro-ethnography) were applied to gain a deeper understanding of the arguments underpinning cyber-security at the center after the attack. The results show that the event had an impact on employees’ perceptions, increasing the perceived importance of ICT security, with positive behavioral changes noted, but with doubts about their sustainability over time. Also, the need for cyber-security governance was critically contrasted with organizational reality. Finally, the compatibility of science and cyber-security was a central dilemma, which seems to confront antagonistic poles (research and security ICT) and justify the non-compliance with security protocols by part of the staff.

网络攻击后西班牙研究中心对网络安全的看法和困境
信息和通信技术以及互联网网络存在于社会现实的方方面面,也是研究、开发和创新中心(R&D&I)的基本要素。网络安全对这些中心开展的研究活动的进展至关重要,特别是考虑到网络攻击和网络事件呈指数级增长。本研究旨在从社会技术角度评估西班牙研究中心遭受的严重网络攻击如何影响工作人员对信息和通信系统(ICT)安全的看法。本研究采用了混合方法研究策略,结合定量和定性方法,以全面、细致地了解员工对信息和通信技术安全的看法。首先,在网络攻击发生前 3 年和发生后 4 个月,对 1,321 名员工进行了定量测量,以衡量他们对 ICT 安全的看法。然后,采用定性技术(半结构式访谈、焦点小组和微观人种学)深入了解攻击发生后中心网络安全的基本论点。结果表明,该事件对员工的观念产生了影响,提高了他们对信息和通信技术安全重要性的认识,并带来了积极的行为变化,但这些变化能否长期持续还存在疑问。此外,网络安全治理的必要性也与组织的现实情况形成了鲜明对比。最后,科学与网络安全的兼容性是一个核心难题,这似乎是对立的两极(研究和安全信息与传播技术),也是部分工作人员不遵守安全协议的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Security
International Journal of Information Security 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Security is an English language periodical on research in information security which offers prompt publication of important technical work, whether theoretical, applicable, or related to implementation. Coverage includes system security: intrusion detection, secure end systems, secure operating systems, database security, security infrastructures, security evaluation; network security: Internet security, firewalls, mobile security, security agents, protocols, anti-virus and anti-hacker measures; content protection: watermarking, software protection, tamper resistant software; applications: electronic commerce, government, health, telecommunications, mobility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信