‘It is successful, and if it is successful, it reduces crime, and it can make the victims happier’: volunteers’ perceptions of working in restorative justice

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Rosie Kitson-Boyce, Palwinder Athwal-Kooner
{"title":"‘It is successful, and if it is successful, it reduces crime, and it can make the victims happier’: volunteers’ perceptions of working in restorative justice","authors":"Rosie Kitson-Boyce, Palwinder Athwal-Kooner","doi":"10.1108/jfp-05-2023-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of those volunteering within a restorative justice service thus enabling an insight into their perceptions of the different methods used, their beliefs about restorative justice effectiveness, and its place within the criminal justice system. The study also sought to identify any challenges and positive experiences the participants encountered during their role as volunteers, with volunteering during the COVID-19 pandemic explored specifically.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Data was collected from the participants (<em>n</em> = 5) via semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis, thus enabling patterns within the experience of the volunteers to be identified.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>A prior understanding and interest in restorative justice was evident within the data, with participants demonstrating a preference for direct, face-to-face mediation. The perceived lack of support from external agencies was discussed along with the role of education in their volunteering experience. Finally, it was acknowledged that although face-to-face practice was deemed the most effective overall, certain practices adopted during COVID-19 enabled aspects of the role to be carried out more efficiently and equally as effectively.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings from this study draw out real-world implications, producing tangible action points for restorative justice services. Some tentative suggestions for future practice are outlined.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The volunteers’ role within restorative justice is often overlooked within the literature (Paul and Borton, 2013) and time constraints can add additional barriers to a hard-to-reach population. However, volunteers play a vital role in restorative justice. By exploring and listening to the volunteers’ experience, this study expands an additional strand within the literature in terms of what makes restorative justice effective and the challenges that are faced from a volunteer perspective.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-05-2023-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of those volunteering within a restorative justice service thus enabling an insight into their perceptions of the different methods used, their beliefs about restorative justice effectiveness, and its place within the criminal justice system. The study also sought to identify any challenges and positive experiences the participants encountered during their role as volunteers, with volunteering during the COVID-19 pandemic explored specifically.

Design/methodology/approach

Data was collected from the participants (n = 5) via semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis, thus enabling patterns within the experience of the volunteers to be identified.

Findings

A prior understanding and interest in restorative justice was evident within the data, with participants demonstrating a preference for direct, face-to-face mediation. The perceived lack of support from external agencies was discussed along with the role of education in their volunteering experience. Finally, it was acknowledged that although face-to-face practice was deemed the most effective overall, certain practices adopted during COVID-19 enabled aspects of the role to be carried out more efficiently and equally as effectively.

Practical implications

The findings from this study draw out real-world implications, producing tangible action points for restorative justice services. Some tentative suggestions for future practice are outlined.

Originality/value

The volunteers’ role within restorative justice is often overlooked within the literature (Paul and Borton, 2013) and time constraints can add additional barriers to a hard-to-reach population. However, volunteers play a vital role in restorative justice. By exploring and listening to the volunteers’ experience, this study expands an additional strand within the literature in terms of what makes restorative justice effective and the challenges that are faced from a volunteer perspective.

它是成功的,如果它是成功的,它就能减少犯罪,并能使受害者更快乐": 志愿者对恢复性司法工作的看法
目的本研究的目的是探讨在恢复性司法服务中志愿工作的人员的经历,从而了解他们对所使用的不同方法的看法、他们对恢复性司法有效性的信念以及恢复性司法在刑事司法系统中的地位。这项研究还试图找出参与者在担任志愿者期间遇到的任何挑战和积极经验,并对 COVID-19 大流行期间的志愿服务进行了具体探讨。设计/方法/方法通过半结构式访谈从参与者(n=5)处收集数据,并使用主题分析法进行分析,从而找出志愿者经验中的模式。研究结果在数据中可以明显看出参与者之前对恢复性司法的理解和兴趣,参与者表现出对直接、面对面调解的偏好。他们还讨论了缺乏外部机构支持的问题,以及教育在志愿服务经历中的作用。最后,与会者承认,尽管面对面的做法被认为是最有效的,但 COVID-19 期间采用的某些做法使角色的某些方面得以更有效地执行,而且同样有效。原创性/价值在文献中,志愿者在恢复性司法中的作用常常被忽视(Paul 和 Borton,2013 年),时间限制会给难以接触到的人群增加额外的障碍。然而,志愿者在恢复性司法中发挥着至关重要的作用。通过探索和倾听志愿者的经验,本研究从志愿者的角度出发,在恢复性司法的有效性和面临的挑战方面,拓展了文献的另一个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Practice
Journal of Forensic Practice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信