The Swiss Patrician Families between Decline and Persistence: Power Positions and Kinship Ties (1890–1957)

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Pierre Benz, Pedro Araujo, Geoffroy Legentilhomme, André Mach, Steven Piguet, Michael A. Strebel, Emilie Widmer
{"title":"The Swiss Patrician Families between Decline and Persistence: Power Positions and Kinship Ties (1890–1957)","authors":"Pierre Benz, Pedro Araujo, Geoffroy Legentilhomme, André Mach, Steven Piguet, Michael A. Strebel, Emilie Widmer","doi":"10.1017/ssh.2024.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship demonstrated the major role of inheritance and kinship for elite’s power reproduction, particularly among noble families. In the absence of monarchic and court structures, ruling classes that enjoyed privileges and engaged in social closure could become the functional equivalent of a nobility. In this paper, we examine the evolution of the power of Swiss patrician families in the three major Swiss cities (Basel, Geneva, and Zurich) since the end of the nineteenth century and assess whether urban oligarchies endure in the twentieth century and what role kinship ties play in the reproduction of power structures. Building on a systematic database of 5,199 urban elites who hold power positions in the main economic, political, academic, and cultural institutions, we describe the evolution of Swiss patrician families between 1890 and 1957. Using social network, kinship, and sequence analysis, we provide a comprehensive investigation of the Swiss patrician elite’s evolution at both the individual and the family level. Our analyses show a general decline of patrician families’ presence in urban positions of power, however with significant variations according to both the cities and the spheres of activity. Furthermore, we identify distinct trajectories of families who have either lost their access to power positions, managed to access again or have remained in urban power positions according to different survival strategies. Beyond the Swiss case, we contribute to the literature on power and kinship through an interdisciplinary approach combining historical and sociological perspectives.","PeriodicalId":46528,"journal":{"name":"Social Science History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2024.6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarship demonstrated the major role of inheritance and kinship for elite’s power reproduction, particularly among noble families. In the absence of monarchic and court structures, ruling classes that enjoyed privileges and engaged in social closure could become the functional equivalent of a nobility. In this paper, we examine the evolution of the power of Swiss patrician families in the three major Swiss cities (Basel, Geneva, and Zurich) since the end of the nineteenth century and assess whether urban oligarchies endure in the twentieth century and what role kinship ties play in the reproduction of power structures. Building on a systematic database of 5,199 urban elites who hold power positions in the main economic, political, academic, and cultural institutions, we describe the evolution of Swiss patrician families between 1890 and 1957. Using social network, kinship, and sequence analysis, we provide a comprehensive investigation of the Swiss patrician elite’s evolution at both the individual and the family level. Our analyses show a general decline of patrician families’ presence in urban positions of power, however with significant variations according to both the cities and the spheres of activity. Furthermore, we identify distinct trajectories of families who have either lost their access to power positions, managed to access again or have remained in urban power positions according to different survival strategies. Beyond the Swiss case, we contribute to the literature on power and kinship through an interdisciplinary approach combining historical and sociological perspectives.
衰落与坚守之间的瑞士贵族家庭:权力地位与亲属关系(1890-1957 年)
学术研究表明,继承和亲属关系在精英的权力再生产中发挥着重要作用,尤其是在贵族家庭中。在没有君主制和宫廷结构的情况下,享有特权和参与社会封闭的统治阶级在功能上相当于贵族。在本文中,我们研究了自 19 世纪末以来瑞士三大城市(巴塞尔、日内瓦和苏黎世)中贵族家族权力的演变,并评估了城市寡头统治在 20 世纪是否持续存在,以及亲属关系在权力结构的再生产中扮演了何种角色。我们建立了一个包含 5199 名在主要经济、政治、学术和文化机构中担任要职的城市精英的系统数据库,并在此基础上描述了 1890 年至 1957 年间瑞士贵族家族的演变过程。通过社会网络、亲属关系和序列分析,我们对瑞士贵族精英在个人和家庭层面的演变进行了全面研究。我们的分析表明,贵族家庭在城市权力地位中的存在感普遍下降,但不同城市和不同活动领域的贵族家庭存在显著差异。此外,我们还发现了一些家族的独特轨迹,他们或是失去了权力地位,或是重新获得了权力地位,或是根据不同的生存策略继续保持在城市权力地位上。除了瑞士的案例,我们还通过结合历史和社会学视角的跨学科方法,为有关权力和亲属关系的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Social Science History seeks to advance the study of the past by publishing research that appeals to the journal"s interdisciplinary readership of historians, sociologists, economists, political scientists, anthropologists, and geographers. The journal invites articles that blend empirical research with theoretical work, undertake comparisons across time and space, or contribute to the development of quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis. Online access to the current issue and all back issues of Social Science History is available to print subscribers through a combination of HighWire Press, Project Muse, and JSTOR via a single user name or password that can be accessed from any location (regardless of institutional affiliation).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信