Redesigning nurse practitioner clinical education with a Dyad/POD model: A feasibility study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学
Dana Burns, Leigh Ann Breckenridge, Allison Gregory, Carla Nye
{"title":"Redesigning nurse practitioner clinical education with a Dyad/POD model: A feasibility study.","authors":"Dana Burns, Leigh Ann Breckenridge, Allison Gregory, Carla Nye","doi":"10.1097/jxx.0000000000001013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical education for nurse practitioner (NP) students is increasingly challenging. With fewer preceptors, lack of resources and time burden, finding clinical placements is a burdensome responsibility. Also, when students have multiple preceptors, there may be inconsistencies when evaluating students. With the change to competency-based education, consistency is crucial when evaluating NP students. Typical preceptorship with students is a 1:1:1 ratio: one student with one preceptor for one semester. The Dyad/Precepting to Optimize Development (POD) model has potential to improve clinical precepting. Precepting to optimize development refers to a consistent team of students, preceptors, and faculty over the course of the students' education. Dyad refers to two students with one preceptor. Students rotate in dyad pairs every 4-8 weeks with a consistent group of preceptors, and see these same preceptors again over the course of their educational journey. Preceptors met monthly to collaborate, discuss, and learn. This article reports on the outcomes of a mixed-methods feasibility study that occurred over a year. The students, preceptors, and faculty report satisfaction with the model. Several themes arose during analysis of focus group sessions. Those themes were as follows: safe learning environment; everyone teaches, everyone learns; growth mindset; teaming culture and the POD structure is essential to the dyad. In conclusion, developing a different approach to precepting is essential to meet national provider needs. The Dyad/POD model provides consistency for development and evaluation of the NP student.","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000001013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical education for nurse practitioner (NP) students is increasingly challenging. With fewer preceptors, lack of resources and time burden, finding clinical placements is a burdensome responsibility. Also, when students have multiple preceptors, there may be inconsistencies when evaluating students. With the change to competency-based education, consistency is crucial when evaluating NP students. Typical preceptorship with students is a 1:1:1 ratio: one student with one preceptor for one semester. The Dyad/Precepting to Optimize Development (POD) model has potential to improve clinical precepting. Precepting to optimize development refers to a consistent team of students, preceptors, and faculty over the course of the students' education. Dyad refers to two students with one preceptor. Students rotate in dyad pairs every 4-8 weeks with a consistent group of preceptors, and see these same preceptors again over the course of their educational journey. Preceptors met monthly to collaborate, discuss, and learn. This article reports on the outcomes of a mixed-methods feasibility study that occurred over a year. The students, preceptors, and faculty report satisfaction with the model. Several themes arose during analysis of focus group sessions. Those themes were as follows: safe learning environment; everyone teaches, everyone learns; growth mindset; teaming culture and the POD structure is essential to the dyad. In conclusion, developing a different approach to precepting is essential to meet national provider needs. The Dyad/POD model provides consistency for development and evaluation of the NP student.
以 Dyad/POD 模式重新设计执业护士临床教育:可行性研究。
执业护士(NP)学生的临床教育越来越具有挑战性。由于实习医生较少、缺乏资源和时间负担,寻找临床实习单位是一项繁重的责任。此外,当学生有多个实习医生时,在评估学生时可能会出现不一致的情况。随着能力本位教育的改变,在评估 NP 学生时,一致性至关重要。学生的典型戒律是 1:1:1 的比例:一名学生与一名戒律师合作一个学期。"优化发展 "模式(Dyad/Precepting to Optimize Development,POD)有可能改善临床带教。所谓 "优化发展的带教",是指在学生接受教育的过程中,由学生、带教老师和教师组成一个稳定的团队。二人一组指的是两名学生与一名戒护师。学生每 4-8 周轮流与一组一致的戒酒师进行配对,并在整个教育过程中再次见到这些戒酒师。实习医生每月会面一次,进行合作、讨论和学习。这篇文章报告了为期一年的混合方法可行性研究的结果。学生、实习指导教师和教师都对该模式表示满意。在对焦点小组会议进行分析的过程中,提出了几个主题。这些主题如下:安全的学习环境;人人都能教,人人都能学;成长心态;团队文化和 POD 结构对二人合作至关重要。总之,为满足全国医疗服务提供者的需求,开发一种不同的戒酒方法至关重要。Dyad/POD模式为护士学生的发展和评估提供了一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信