Predicting stroke risk after sepsis hospitalization with new-onset atrial fibrillation

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Laura C. Myers MD, MPH, Ithan D. Peltan MD, MSc, Khanh K. Thai MS, Patricia Kipnis PhD, Manisha Desai PhD, Ycar Devis BS, Heather Clancy MPH, Yun W. Lu MPH, Samuel M. Brown MD, MS, Alan S. Go MD, Romain S. Neugebauer PhD, Vincent X. Liu MD, MS, Allan J. Walkey MD, MSc
{"title":"Predicting stroke risk after sepsis hospitalization with new-onset atrial fibrillation","authors":"Laura C. Myers MD, MPH,&nbsp;Ithan D. Peltan MD, MSc,&nbsp;Khanh K. Thai MS,&nbsp;Patricia Kipnis PhD,&nbsp;Manisha Desai PhD,&nbsp;Ycar Devis BS,&nbsp;Heather Clancy MPH,&nbsp;Yun W. Lu MPH,&nbsp;Samuel M. Brown MD, MS,&nbsp;Alan S. Go MD,&nbsp;Romain S. Neugebauer PhD,&nbsp;Vincent X. Liu MD, MS,&nbsp;Allan J. Walkey MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) during sepsis is common, but models designed to stratify stroke risk excluded patients with secondary AF. We assessed the predictive validity of CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>VASc scores among patients with new-onset AF during sepsis and developed a novel stroke prediction model incorporating presepsis and intrasepsis characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included patients ≥40 years old who survived hospitalizations with sepsis and new-onset AF across 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals from January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2017. We calculated the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>VASc scores to predict stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 1 year after a hospitalization with new-onset AF during sepsis using Fine-Gray models with death as competing risk. We similarly derived and validated a novel model using presepsis and intrasepsis characteristics associated with 1-year stroke/TIA risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 82,748 adults hospitalized with sepsis, 3992 with new-onset AF (median age: 80 years, median CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>VASc of 4) survived to discharge, among whom 70 (2.1%) experienced stroke or TIA outcome and 1393 (41.0%) died within 1 year of sepsis. The CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>VASc score was not predictive of stroke risk after sepsis (AUC: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–0.52). A newly derived model among 2555 (64%) patients in the derivation set and 1437 (36%) in the validation set included 13 variables and produced an AUC of 0.61 (0.49–0.73) in derivation and 0.54 (0.43–0.65) in validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Current models do not accurately stratify risk of stroke following new-onset AF secondary to sepsis. New tools are required to guide anticoagulation decisions following new-onset AF in sepsis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) during sepsis is common, but models designed to stratify stroke risk excluded patients with secondary AF. We assessed the predictive validity of CHA2DS2VASc scores among patients with new-onset AF during sepsis and developed a novel stroke prediction model incorporating presepsis and intrasepsis characteristics.

Methods

We included patients ≥40 years old who survived hospitalizations with sepsis and new-onset AF across 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals from January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2017. We calculated the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for CHA2DS2VASc scores to predict stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 1 year after a hospitalization with new-onset AF during sepsis using Fine-Gray models with death as competing risk. We similarly derived and validated a novel model using presepsis and intrasepsis characteristics associated with 1-year stroke/TIA risk.

Results

Among 82,748 adults hospitalized with sepsis, 3992 with new-onset AF (median age: 80 years, median CHA2DS2VASc of 4) survived to discharge, among whom 70 (2.1%) experienced stroke or TIA outcome and 1393 (41.0%) died within 1 year of sepsis. The CHA2DS2VASc score was not predictive of stroke risk after sepsis (AUC: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–0.52). A newly derived model among 2555 (64%) patients in the derivation set and 1437 (36%) in the validation set included 13 variables and produced an AUC of 0.61 (0.49–0.73) in derivation and 0.54 (0.43–0.65) in validation.

Conclusion

Current models do not accurately stratify risk of stroke following new-onset AF secondary to sepsis. New tools are required to guide anticoagulation decisions following new-onset AF in sepsis.

Abstract Image

脓毒症住院后新发心房颤动的中风风险预测
脓毒症期间新发房颤(AF)很常见,但旨在对卒中风险进行分层的模型却将继发性房颤患者排除在外。我们评估了脓毒症期间新发房颤患者的 CHA2DS2VASc 评分的预测有效性,并结合脓毒症前和脓毒症期间的特征开发了一种新型卒中预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信