Efficacy of consolidation of immune checkpoint inhibitor after chemoradiation for unresectable, locally advanced PD‑L1 negative non‑small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Sunyin Rao, Li Min, Jie Zhao, Juan Su, Lianhua Ye
{"title":"Efficacy of consolidation of immune checkpoint inhibitor after chemoradiation for unresectable, locally advanced PD‑L1 negative non‑small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.","authors":"Sunyin Rao, Li Min, Jie Zhao, Juan Su, Lianhua Ye","doi":"10.3892/ol.2024.14375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as durvalumab or pembrolizumab, for patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumor PD-L1 expression <1% remains a topic of controversy. Previous studies from PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched for a meta-analysis. A total of 16 studies were included in part one of the meta-analysis and it was observed that consolidation of ICIs after CRT improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46; P=0.005] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.26; P=0.023) for the patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% compared with those with PD-L1 expression <1%. Then, 15 studies were included in part two of the meta-analysis and the results indicated that the pooled 1, 2 and 3-year OS were 77% vs. 83% (P=0.07), 55% vs. 59% (P=0.327) and 38% vs. 51% (P=0.006) for CRT alone compared with CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs, respectively. The pooled 1, 2 and 3-year PFS were 51% vs. 53% (P=0.632), 29% vs. 40% (P=0.015) and 20% vs. 28% (P=0.153) for CRT alone compared with CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs, respectively. The findings of the present study highlighted that the benefits of CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs were higher compared with CRT alone in patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <1%. Consolidation of ICIs after CRT would provide greater benefits for locally advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% compared with those with PD-L1 expression <1%.","PeriodicalId":19503,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as durvalumab or pembrolizumab, for patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumor PD-L1 expression <1% remains a topic of controversy. Previous studies from PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched for a meta-analysis. A total of 16 studies were included in part one of the meta-analysis and it was observed that consolidation of ICIs after CRT improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46; P=0.005] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.26; P=0.023) for the patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% compared with those with PD-L1 expression <1%. Then, 15 studies were included in part two of the meta-analysis and the results indicated that the pooled 1, 2 and 3-year OS were 77% vs. 83% (P=0.07), 55% vs. 59% (P=0.327) and 38% vs. 51% (P=0.006) for CRT alone compared with CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs, respectively. The pooled 1, 2 and 3-year PFS were 51% vs. 53% (P=0.632), 29% vs. 40% (P=0.015) and 20% vs. 28% (P=0.153) for CRT alone compared with CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs, respectively. The findings of the present study highlighted that the benefits of CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs were higher compared with CRT alone in patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <1%. Consolidation of ICIs after CRT would provide greater benefits for locally advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% compared with those with PD-L1 expression <1%.
化疗后巩固免疫检查点抑制剂治疗不可切除的局部晚期 PD-L1 阴性非小细胞肺癌的疗效:系统综述与荟萃分析。
对于肿瘤PD-L1表达为<1%的不可切除的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,化放疗(CRT)后使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)(如durvalumab或pembrolizumab)进行巩固治疗仍存在争议。我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库中的既往研究,并进行了荟萃分析。第一部分荟萃分析共纳入了16项研究,结果显示,与PD-L1表达<1%的患者相比,PD-L1表达≥1%的患者在CRT后巩固ICIs可改善总生存期(OS)[危险比(HR)1.46;P=0.005]和无进展生存期(PFS)(HR 1.26;P=0.023)。随后,15 项研究被纳入荟萃分析的第二部分,结果显示,单独 CRT 与 CRT 后合并 ICIs 相比,1、2 和 3 年 OS 的总和分别为 77% vs. 83% (P=0.07)、55% vs. 59% (P=0.327) 和 38% vs. 51% (P=0.006)。单用CRT与CRT后合并ICIs相比,1年、2年和3年的PFS分别为51% vs. 53% (P=0.632)、29% vs. 40% (P=0.015)和20% vs. 28% (P=0.153)。本研究结果表明,对于无法切除、局部晚期NSCLC且PD-L1表达为<1%的患者,CRT后巩固ICIs的获益高于单纯CRT。与PD-L1表达为<1%的患者相比,PD-L1表达≥1%的局部晚期NSCLC患者在CRT后巩固使用ICIs的获益更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology Letters
Oncology Letters ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Letters is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online, that focuses on all aspects of clinical oncology, as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental model systems relevant to the mechanisms of disease. The principal aim of Oncology Letters is to provide the prompt publication of original studies of high quality that pertain to clinical oncology, chemotherapy, oncogenes, carcinogenesis, metastasis, epidemiology and viral oncology in the form of original research, reviews and case reports.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信