Activity of dingoes (Canis familiaris) and their use of anthropogenic resources in the Strzelecki Desert, South Australia

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Wildlife Research Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1071/wr23083
Paul D. Meek, Guy A. Ballard, James Abell, Heath Milne, Deane Smith, Peter J. S. Fleming
{"title":"Activity of dingoes (Canis familiaris) and their use of anthropogenic resources in the Strzelecki Desert, South Australia","authors":"Paul D. Meek, Guy A. Ballard, James Abell, Heath Milne, Deane Smith, Peter J. S. Fleming","doi":"10.1071/wr23083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>Managing human–wildlife conflict where anthropogenic resources are provided is difficult. Providing food, water and shelter can result in over-abundant dingo populations, especially in Australian desert mine sites where managing dingoes, wildlife and humans around waste-management facilities and camps is problematic.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>To measure and characterise the spatial activities of a population of arid-zone dingoes in relation to resources provided by a Cooper Basin (Strzelecki Desert, South Australia mining operation). The results were used to facilitate effective dingo management.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Free-roaming dingoes were captured, their morphometrics and ectoparasite presence recorded, and they were fitted with Iridium (GPS) radio collars. These were used to collect high-fidelity data about individual dingo activity and movements in relation to mine-site infrastructure and the Cooper Basin ecosystem.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>A high density of dingoes (181 trapped in 2 km<sup>2</sup> per 4 years) was associated with the mining operation. Home range/activity area sizes and usage of the anthropogenic landscape showed the following three categories of dingo: desert, peripatetic and tip dingoes. Dingoes reliant on food provisioning at the waste-management facility (WMF) displayed activity areas with a strong focus on the WMF (tip dingoes). Temporal activity patterns of another group of dingoes (peripatetic dingoes) were associated with regular waste-dumping times and normal nocturnal activity away from the WMF. Of the 27 dingoes collared, 30% (i.e. desert dingoes) were not dependent on the WMF, spending more time and a greater area of use in the desert dune system than in the mine-site area.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>On the basis of the capture of 181 dingoes over 4 years and home-range analysis, it is likely that anthropogenic resource provisioning has caused an overabundance of dingoes in the Cooper Basin mine site. However, some of the dingo population remains reliant on native wildlife and resources in the surrounding desert. Managing food waste and excluding dingoes from food, water and shelter will result in a change in the prevalence of dingoes in the mine site, and subsequent reduction in the risk of disease transmission, native wildlife impacts, human conflicts and social pressures on dingoes, influencing them to revert to domestic-dog behaviours.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Waste-management facilities where food is dumped provide resources that lead to a change in wild-dingo behaviour, on the basis of their acceptance of human-provided resources, and high abundance. Managing access to anthropogenic resources will reduce the population as well as unwanted or aggressive encounters with humans. Dingoes reliant on food scraps will be encouraged to adjust their activity areas to desert habitat, thereby providing natural hunting opportunities and reduced contact rates with conspecifics, thus potentially reducing pathogen transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":23971,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Research","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr23083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Managing human–wildlife conflict where anthropogenic resources are provided is difficult. Providing food, water and shelter can result in over-abundant dingo populations, especially in Australian desert mine sites where managing dingoes, wildlife and humans around waste-management facilities and camps is problematic.

Aims

To measure and characterise the spatial activities of a population of arid-zone dingoes in relation to resources provided by a Cooper Basin (Strzelecki Desert, South Australia mining operation). The results were used to facilitate effective dingo management.

Methods

Free-roaming dingoes were captured, their morphometrics and ectoparasite presence recorded, and they were fitted with Iridium (GPS) radio collars. These were used to collect high-fidelity data about individual dingo activity and movements in relation to mine-site infrastructure and the Cooper Basin ecosystem.

Key results

A high density of dingoes (181 trapped in 2 km2 per 4 years) was associated with the mining operation. Home range/activity area sizes and usage of the anthropogenic landscape showed the following three categories of dingo: desert, peripatetic and tip dingoes. Dingoes reliant on food provisioning at the waste-management facility (WMF) displayed activity areas with a strong focus on the WMF (tip dingoes). Temporal activity patterns of another group of dingoes (peripatetic dingoes) were associated with regular waste-dumping times and normal nocturnal activity away from the WMF. Of the 27 dingoes collared, 30% (i.e. desert dingoes) were not dependent on the WMF, spending more time and a greater area of use in the desert dune system than in the mine-site area.

Conclusions

On the basis of the capture of 181 dingoes over 4 years and home-range analysis, it is likely that anthropogenic resource provisioning has caused an overabundance of dingoes in the Cooper Basin mine site. However, some of the dingo population remains reliant on native wildlife and resources in the surrounding desert. Managing food waste and excluding dingoes from food, water and shelter will result in a change in the prevalence of dingoes in the mine site, and subsequent reduction in the risk of disease transmission, native wildlife impacts, human conflicts and social pressures on dingoes, influencing them to revert to domestic-dog behaviours.

Implications

Waste-management facilities where food is dumped provide resources that lead to a change in wild-dingo behaviour, on the basis of their acceptance of human-provided resources, and high abundance. Managing access to anthropogenic resources will reduce the population as well as unwanted or aggressive encounters with humans. Dingoes reliant on food scraps will be encouraged to adjust their activity areas to desert habitat, thereby providing natural hunting opportunities and reduced contact rates with conspecifics, thus potentially reducing pathogen transmission.

南澳大利亚 Strzelecki 沙漠中野狗的活动及其对人类资源的利用
背景在提供人为资源的地方,管理人类与野生动物之间的冲突十分困难。提供食物、水和栖息地可能会导致野狗数量过多,尤其是在澳大利亚沙漠矿区,管理废物管理设施和营地周围的野狗、野生动物和人类是个难题。目的根据库珀盆地(Strzelecki 沙漠,南澳大利亚州采矿作业区)提供的资源,测量和描述干旱区野狗种群的空间活动。研究结果用于促进对野狗的有效管理。方法捕捉自由漫步的野狗,记录它们的形态特征和体外寄生虫的存在情况,并为它们安装铱(GPS)无线电项圈。这些装置用于收集有关个体野狗活动以及与矿区基础设施和库珀盆地生态系统相关的移动情况的高保真数据。主要结果 采矿作业导致了高密度的恐鸟(每 4 年 2 平方公里内捕获 181 只)。家园范围/活动区域的大小和对人为景观的使用情况显示了以下三类野狗:沙漠野狗、周边野狗和尖头野狗。依赖废物管理设施(WMF)提供食物的恐鸟的活动区域主要集中在废物管理设施(尖头恐鸟)。另一类野狗(巡回野狗)的时间活动模式与固定的废物倾倒时间和远离废物管理设施的正常夜间活动有关。在27只被套上项圈的野驴中,30%(即沙漠野驴)并不依赖于WMF,它们在沙漠沙丘系统中花费的时间和使用的面积比在矿区中更多。结论 根据 4 年中捕获的 181 只野狗和家园范围分析,人为资源供给很可能导致库珀盆地矿区野狗数量过多。然而,部分野狗种群仍然依赖于周围沙漠中的本地野生动物和资源。对食物垃圾进行管理,使野狗无法获得食物、水和栖息地,将改变矿区野狗的数量,从而降低疾病传播的风险、对本地野生动物的影响、人类冲突以及对野狗的社会压力,影响它们恢复家犬的行为。影响倾倒食物的废物管理设施提供了导致野生恐鸟行为改变的资源,其基础是它们接受人类提供的资源和高丰度。对获取人为资源的途径进行管理将减少野生鼎蜥的数量以及与人类的不愉快或攻击性接触。依赖食物残渣的野丁狗将被鼓励调整其活动区域,以适应沙漠栖息地,从而提供自然狩猎机会,减少与同类的接触率,从而可能减少病原体的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Research
Wildlife Research 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Wildlife Research represents an international forum for the publication of research and debate on the ecology, management and conservation of wild animals in natural and modified habitats. The journal combines basic research in wildlife ecology with advances in science-based management practice. Subject areas include: applied ecology; conservation biology; ecosystem management; management of over-abundant, pest and invasive species; global change and wildlife management; diseases and their impacts on wildlife populations; human dimensions of management and conservation; assessing management outcomes; and the implications of wildlife research for policy development. Readers can expect a range of papers covering well-structured field studies, manipulative experiments, and analytical and modelling studies. All articles aim to improve the practice of wildlife management and contribute conceptual advances to our knowledge and understanding of wildlife ecology. Wildlife Research is a vital resource for wildlife scientists, students and managers, applied ecologists, conservation biologists, environmental consultants and NGOs and government policy advisors. Wildlife Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信