The performance of the EQ-HWB-S as a measure of quality-of-life of caregivers in families that have experienced adverse events

Cate Bailey, Kim Dalziel, Leanne Constable, Nancy J. Devlin, Harriet Hiscock, Helen Skouteris, Tessa Peasgood
{"title":"The performance of the EQ-HWB-S as a measure of quality-of-life of caregivers in families that have experienced adverse events","authors":"Cate Bailey, Kim Dalziel, Leanne Constable, Nancy J. Devlin, Harriet Hiscock, Helen Skouteris, Tessa Peasgood","doi":"10.1007/s10198-024-01688-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The recently developed EQ Health and Wellbeing Instrument (EQ-HWB) is a broad, generic measure of quality-of-life designed to be suitable for caregivers. The aim of this study was to investigate performance and validity of the 9-item version (EQ-HWB-S) for caregivers where families had experienced adverse-life-events.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Using survey data from caregivers of children aged 0–8 years attending a community-health centre in 2021–2022, the general performance, feasibility, convergent and known-group validity, responsiveness-to-change, and test–retest reliability of the EQ-HWB-S was assessed. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with survey respondents to assess acceptability and content validity.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The sample included 234 caregivers at baseline (81% female, mean age 36-years, 38% Australian-born) and 190 at 6-months follow-up. Most EQ-HWB-S item responses were evenly spread, except for ‘Mobility’. The instrument showed good convergent validity with psychological distress (Kessler 6 (K6)) and personal-wellbeing (PWI-A) scales. EQ-HWB-S level sum-scores and preference-weighted scores were significantly different in all known-group analyses, in expected directions, and the instrument was responsive to change. For test–retest reliability, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were excellent and individual item Kappa scores were moderate. The instrument was well received by interviewees who found the questions clear and relevant. The items were appropriate for parents experiencing adversity and carers of children with additional needs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The EQ-HWB-S appeared valid, responsive to change, feasible, and well accepted by caregivers. By demonstrating the validity of the EQ-HWB-S in this hard-to-reach population of caregivers in families experiencing adverse events, this study adds to existing international evidence supporting its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22450,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01688-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The recently developed EQ Health and Wellbeing Instrument (EQ-HWB) is a broad, generic measure of quality-of-life designed to be suitable for caregivers. The aim of this study was to investigate performance and validity of the 9-item version (EQ-HWB-S) for caregivers where families had experienced adverse-life-events.

Methods

Using survey data from caregivers of children aged 0–8 years attending a community-health centre in 2021–2022, the general performance, feasibility, convergent and known-group validity, responsiveness-to-change, and test–retest reliability of the EQ-HWB-S was assessed. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with survey respondents to assess acceptability and content validity.

Results

The sample included 234 caregivers at baseline (81% female, mean age 36-years, 38% Australian-born) and 190 at 6-months follow-up. Most EQ-HWB-S item responses were evenly spread, except for ‘Mobility’. The instrument showed good convergent validity with psychological distress (Kessler 6 (K6)) and personal-wellbeing (PWI-A) scales. EQ-HWB-S level sum-scores and preference-weighted scores were significantly different in all known-group analyses, in expected directions, and the instrument was responsive to change. For test–retest reliability, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were excellent and individual item Kappa scores were moderate. The instrument was well received by interviewees who found the questions clear and relevant. The items were appropriate for parents experiencing adversity and carers of children with additional needs.

Conclusion

The EQ-HWB-S appeared valid, responsive to change, feasible, and well accepted by caregivers. By demonstrating the validity of the EQ-HWB-S in this hard-to-reach population of caregivers in families experiencing adverse events, this study adds to existing international evidence supporting its use.

Abstract Image

EQ-HWB-S 作为衡量发生不良事件家庭中照顾者生活质量的指标的性能
目的最近开发的情商健康与幸福测量工具(EQ-HWB)是一种广泛、通用的生活质量测量工具,旨在适用于照顾者。本研究旨在调查 9 个项目版本(EQ-HWB-S)的性能和有效性,以了解曾经历不利生活事件的家庭的照顾者的情况。方法利用 2021-2022 年在社区保健中心就诊的 0-8 岁儿童照顾者的调查数据,评估 EQ-HWB-S 的一般性能、可行性、收敛性和已知组有效性、对变化的反应性以及测试-再测可靠性。对调查对象进行了 12 次半结构化访谈,以评估可接受性和内容有效性。结果样本包括基线时的 234 名护理人员(81% 为女性,平均年龄 36 岁,38% 在澳大利亚出生)和 6 个月随访时的 190 名护理人员。除 "行动能力 "外,EQ-HWB-S 大部分项目的回答都很平均。该工具与心理困扰量表(Kessler 6 (K6))和个人幸福感量表(PWI-A)具有良好的收敛效度。在所有已知组分析中,EQ-HWB-S 的水平总分和偏好加权分数在预期方向上都有显著差异,而且该工具对变化反应灵敏。在测试-重测可靠性方面,类内相关系数(Intraclass Correlation Coefficient)非常好,单个项目的 Kappa 分数适中。该工具深受受访者欢迎,他们认为问题清晰且贴切。结论:EQ-HWB-S 是有效的、能应对变化的、可行的,并且被照顾者广泛接受。本研究证明了 EQ-HWB-S 在遭遇逆境家庭的照顾者这一难以接触的人群中的有效性,从而为支持其使用的现有国际证据增添了新的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信