Pilot study of a decision aid on BRCA1/2 genetic testing among Orthodox Jewish women

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Meghna S. Trivedi, Haley Manley, Haeseung Yi, Thomas Silverman, Wendy K. Chung, Paul S. Appelbaum, Rebecca Starck, Isaac Schecter, Rita Kukafka, Katherine D. Crew
{"title":"Pilot study of a decision aid on BRCA1/2 genetic testing among Orthodox Jewish women","authors":"Meghna S. Trivedi, Haley Manley, Haeseung Yi, Thomas Silverman, Wendy K. Chung, Paul S. Appelbaum, Rebecca Starck, Isaac Schecter, Rita Kukafka, Katherine D. Crew","doi":"10.1007/s10689-024-00371-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Orthodox Jewish women face unique social, cultural, and religious factors that may influence uptake of <i>BRCA1/2</i> genetic testing. We examined the impact of a web-based decision aid (DA) on <i>BRCA1/2</i> genetic testing intention/completion among Orthodox Jewish women. We conducted a single-arm pilot study among 50 Orthodox Jewish women who were given access to a web-based DA entitled <i>RealRisks</i> and administered serial surveys at baseline and 1 and 6 months after exposure to the DA. Descriptive statistics were conducted for baseline characteristics and study measures. Comparisons were made to assess changes in study measures over time. Fifty Orthodox Jewish women enrolled in the study with a mean age of 43.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 14.6), 70% Modern Orthodox, 2% with personal history of breast cancer, and 68% and 16% with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer, respectively. At baseline, 27 (54%) participants intended to complete genetic testing. Forty-three participants (86%) completed <i>RealRisks</i> and the 1-month survey and 38 (76%) completed the 6-month survey. There was a significant improvement in <i>BRCA1/2</i> genetic testing knowledge and decrease in decisional conflict after exposure to the DA. At 1 month, only 20 (46.5%) completed or intended to complete genetic testing (<i>p</i> = 0.473 compared to baseline). While the DA improved genetic testing knowledge and reduced decisional conflict, genetic testing intention/completion did not increase over time. Future interventions should directly address barriers to <i>BRCA1/2</i> genetic testing uptake and include input from leaders in the Orthodox Jewish community.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">ClinicalTrials.gov ID</h3><p>NCT03624088 (8/7/18).</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-024-00371-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Orthodox Jewish women face unique social, cultural, and religious factors that may influence uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing. We examined the impact of a web-based decision aid (DA) on BRCA1/2 genetic testing intention/completion among Orthodox Jewish women. We conducted a single-arm pilot study among 50 Orthodox Jewish women who were given access to a web-based DA entitled RealRisks and administered serial surveys at baseline and 1 and 6 months after exposure to the DA. Descriptive statistics were conducted for baseline characteristics and study measures. Comparisons were made to assess changes in study measures over time. Fifty Orthodox Jewish women enrolled in the study with a mean age of 43.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 14.6), 70% Modern Orthodox, 2% with personal history of breast cancer, and 68% and 16% with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer, respectively. At baseline, 27 (54%) participants intended to complete genetic testing. Forty-three participants (86%) completed RealRisks and the 1-month survey and 38 (76%) completed the 6-month survey. There was a significant improvement in BRCA1/2 genetic testing knowledge and decrease in decisional conflict after exposure to the DA. At 1 month, only 20 (46.5%) completed or intended to complete genetic testing (p = 0.473 compared to baseline). While the DA improved genetic testing knowledge and reduced decisional conflict, genetic testing intention/completion did not increase over time. Future interventions should directly address barriers to BRCA1/2 genetic testing uptake and include input from leaders in the Orthodox Jewish community.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT03624088 (8/7/18).

Abstract Image

对东正教犹太妇女进行 BRCA1/2 基因检测的辅助决策试点研究
导言:东正教犹太妇女面临着独特的社会、文化和宗教因素,这些因素可能会影响她们接受 BRCA1/2 基因检测。我们研究了基于网络的决策辅助工具(DA)对东正教犹太妇女的 BRCA1/2 基因检测意向/完成情况的影响。我们在 50 名东正教犹太妇女中开展了一项单臂试点研究,她们获得了名为 RealRisks 的网络辅助决策工具,并在基线以及接触该辅助决策工具 1 个月和 6 个月后进行了连续调查。对基线特征和研究措施进行了描述性统计。通过比较来评估研究指标随时间的变化。参加研究的 50 名正统犹太妇女的平均年龄为 43.9 岁(标准差 [SD] 14.6),70% 为现代正统派,2% 有个人乳腺癌病史,68% 和 16% 分别有乳腺癌或卵巢癌家族史。基线时,27 名参与者(54%)打算完成基因检测。43 名参与者(86%)完成了 RealRisks 和为期 1 个月的调查,38 名参与者(76%)完成了为期 6 个月的调查。接触 DA 后,BRCA1/2 基因检测知识有了明显提高,决策冲突也有所减少。1 个月时,只有 20 人(46.5%)完成或打算完成基因检测(与基线相比,p = 0.473)。虽然 DA 提高了基因检测知识并减少了决策冲突,但基因检测意向/完成率并没有随着时间的推移而增加。未来的干预措施应直接解决BRCA1/2基因检测接受率的障碍,并包括东正教犹太社区领袖的意见。ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT03624088 (8/7/18).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信