{"title":"Probabilistic sigma taxonomy of Darwin’s finches (Galápagos)","authors":"Francis Thackeray","doi":"10.1007/s00435-024-00650-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A study is undertaken using anatomical measurements of specimens attributed to six species of <i>Geospiza</i>, the ground finches from the Galápagos archipelago. In a demonstration of method, a probabilistic approach associated with “sigma taxonomy” is adopted to assess the probability that pairs of specimens are or are not conspecific. We use a definition of a species based on morphometric analyses of the kind previously undertaken on extant vertebrate taxa (including mammals, birds and reptiles), using pairwise comparisons of anatomical measurements in regression analyses of the form <i>y</i> = <i>mx</i> + <i>c</i> from which the log-transformed standard error of the m-coefficient is calculated (“log sem”). The latter statistic is a reflection of variability in morphology. There is a high probability that at a species level, specimens attributed to <i>G. magnirostris</i> are different from those attributed to <i>G. fulginosa</i>, <i>G. difficilis</i> or <i>G. scandens</i>. Results of this study, using probabilistic sigma taxonomy, confirm the refutation of a single species hypothesis. In addition, we apply the log sem method to demonstrate that in case of comparisons between <i>G. fortis</i> and <i>G. scandens</i> (which are known to hybridise), there is a high probability that they are not different at a species level.</p>","PeriodicalId":24027,"journal":{"name":"Zoomorphology","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoomorphology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-024-00650-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A study is undertaken using anatomical measurements of specimens attributed to six species of Geospiza, the ground finches from the Galápagos archipelago. In a demonstration of method, a probabilistic approach associated with “sigma taxonomy” is adopted to assess the probability that pairs of specimens are or are not conspecific. We use a definition of a species based on morphometric analyses of the kind previously undertaken on extant vertebrate taxa (including mammals, birds and reptiles), using pairwise comparisons of anatomical measurements in regression analyses of the form y = mx + c from which the log-transformed standard error of the m-coefficient is calculated (“log sem”). The latter statistic is a reflection of variability in morphology. There is a high probability that at a species level, specimens attributed to G. magnirostris are different from those attributed to G. fulginosa, G. difficilis or G. scandens. Results of this study, using probabilistic sigma taxonomy, confirm the refutation of a single species hypothesis. In addition, we apply the log sem method to demonstrate that in case of comparisons between G. fortis and G. scandens (which are known to hybridise), there is a high probability that they are not different at a species level.
本研究利用对加拉帕戈斯群岛六种地雀(Geospiza)标本的解剖测量进行了研究。在方法演示中,我们采用了与 "西格玛分类法 "相关的概率方法来评估成对标本是或不是同种的概率。我们使用的物种定义是基于以前对现存脊椎动物类群(包括哺乳动物、鸟类和爬行动物)进行的形态计量分析,在回归分析中使用解剖测量的成对比较,形式为 y = mx + c,从中计算出 m 系数的对数变换标准误差("log sem")。后一种统计量反映了形态学的变异性。在物种水平上,归属于 G. magnirostris 的标本很可能不同于归属于 G. fulginosa、G. difficilis 或 G. scandens 的标本。本研究利用概率西格玛分类法得出的结果证实了单一物种假说的反驳。此外,我们还应用对数sem方法证明,在比较福氏蛙和斯堪的纳蛙(已知它们会杂交)时,它们在物种水平上没有差异的可能性很高。
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original research papers, reviews and method papers. While reviews should be designed as comparative surveys, summarizing the current knowledge from an evolutionary perspective, method papers should present new approaches or reviews on methods used in animal morphology. The research papers should be based on morphological investigation of invertebrates and vertebrates at the macroscopic, microscopic and ultrastructural level, including embryological studies.