Drude's lesser known error of a factor of two and Lorentz's correction

Navinder Singh
{"title":"Drude's lesser known error of a factor of two and Lorentz's correction","authors":"Navinder Singh","doi":"arxiv-2403.19682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As is well known, Paul Drude put forward the very first quantitative theory\nof electrical conduction in metals in 1900. He could successfully account for\nthe Wiedemann-Franz law which states that the ratio of thermal to electrical\nconductivity divided by temperature is a constant called the Lorenz number. As\nit turns out, in Drude's derivation, there is a lucky cancellation of two\nerrors. Drude's under-estimate (by an order of 100) of the value of square of\nthe average electron velocity compensated his over-estimate of the electronic\nheat capacity (by the same order of 100). This compensation or cancellation of\ntwo errors lead to a value of the Lorenz number very close to its experimental\nvalue. This is well known. There is another error of a factor of two which\nDrude made when he calculated two different relaxation times for heat\nconductivity and electrical conductivity. In this article we highlight how and\nwhy this error occurred in Drude's derivation and how it was removed 5 years\nlater (that is in 1905) by Hendrik Lorentz when he used the Boltzmann equation\nand a single relaxation time. This article is of pedagogical value and may be\nuseful to undergraduate/graduate students learning solid state physics.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.19682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As is well known, Paul Drude put forward the very first quantitative theory of electrical conduction in metals in 1900. He could successfully account for the Wiedemann-Franz law which states that the ratio of thermal to electrical conductivity divided by temperature is a constant called the Lorenz number. As it turns out, in Drude's derivation, there is a lucky cancellation of two errors. Drude's under-estimate (by an order of 100) of the value of square of the average electron velocity compensated his over-estimate of the electronic heat capacity (by the same order of 100). This compensation or cancellation of two errors lead to a value of the Lorenz number very close to its experimental value. This is well known. There is another error of a factor of two which Drude made when he calculated two different relaxation times for heat conductivity and electrical conductivity. In this article we highlight how and why this error occurred in Drude's derivation and how it was removed 5 years later (that is in 1905) by Hendrik Lorentz when he used the Boltzmann equation and a single relaxation time. This article is of pedagogical value and may be useful to undergraduate/graduate students learning solid state physics.
德鲁德较少为人知的 2 倍误差和洛伦兹校正
众所周知,保罗-德鲁德(Paul Drude)于 1900 年首次提出了金属导电的定量理论。他成功地解释了维德曼-弗兰兹定律,该定律指出热导率与电导率之比除以温度就是一个常数,称为洛伦兹数。事实证明,在德鲁德的推导中,有两个错误被幸运地抵消了。德鲁德对电子平均速度平方值的低估(100 数量级)补偿了他对电子热容量的高估(同样是 100 数量级)。这种对两个误差的补偿或抵消导致洛伦兹数的值非常接近其实验值。这是众所周知的。德鲁德在计算热导率和电导率的两种不同弛豫时间时,还存在另一个两倍的误差。在这篇文章中,我们重点介绍了德鲁德的推导中如何以及为什么会出现这个错误,以及亨德里克-洛伦兹(Hendrik Lorentz)在 5 年后(即 1905 年)使用波尔兹曼方程和单一弛豫时间时如何消除了这个错误。本文具有教学价值,可能对学习固体物理的本科生/研究生有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信