{"title":"Drude's lesser known error of a factor of two and Lorentz's correction","authors":"Navinder Singh","doi":"arxiv-2403.19682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As is well known, Paul Drude put forward the very first quantitative theory\nof electrical conduction in metals in 1900. He could successfully account for\nthe Wiedemann-Franz law which states that the ratio of thermal to electrical\nconductivity divided by temperature is a constant called the Lorenz number. As\nit turns out, in Drude's derivation, there is a lucky cancellation of two\nerrors. Drude's under-estimate (by an order of 100) of the value of square of\nthe average electron velocity compensated his over-estimate of the electronic\nheat capacity (by the same order of 100). This compensation or cancellation of\ntwo errors lead to a value of the Lorenz number very close to its experimental\nvalue. This is well known. There is another error of a factor of two which\nDrude made when he calculated two different relaxation times for heat\nconductivity and electrical conductivity. In this article we highlight how and\nwhy this error occurred in Drude's derivation and how it was removed 5 years\nlater (that is in 1905) by Hendrik Lorentz when he used the Boltzmann equation\nand a single relaxation time. This article is of pedagogical value and may be\nuseful to undergraduate/graduate students learning solid state physics.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.19682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As is well known, Paul Drude put forward the very first quantitative theory
of electrical conduction in metals in 1900. He could successfully account for
the Wiedemann-Franz law which states that the ratio of thermal to electrical
conductivity divided by temperature is a constant called the Lorenz number. As
it turns out, in Drude's derivation, there is a lucky cancellation of two
errors. Drude's under-estimate (by an order of 100) of the value of square of
the average electron velocity compensated his over-estimate of the electronic
heat capacity (by the same order of 100). This compensation or cancellation of
two errors lead to a value of the Lorenz number very close to its experimental
value. This is well known. There is another error of a factor of two which
Drude made when he calculated two different relaxation times for heat
conductivity and electrical conductivity. In this article we highlight how and
why this error occurred in Drude's derivation and how it was removed 5 years
later (that is in 1905) by Hendrik Lorentz when he used the Boltzmann equation
and a single relaxation time. This article is of pedagogical value and may be
useful to undergraduate/graduate students learning solid state physics.