Population parameters of Drosophila larval cooperative foraging

Amy Liao, Christy Qian, Sepideh Abdi, Peyton Yee, Sean Michael Cursain, Niav Condron, Barry Condron
{"title":"Population parameters of Drosophila larval cooperative foraging","authors":"Amy Liao, Christy Qian, Sepideh Abdi, Peyton Yee, Sean Michael Cursain, Niav Condron, Barry Condron","doi":"10.1007/s00359-024-01701-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cooperative foraging behavior can be advantageous when there is a common exploitable resource. By cooperating, members of the group can take advantage of the potential of increased efficiency of working together as well as equitable distribution of the product. An experimental signature of cooperative foraging is an Allee effect where at a certain number of individuals, there is a peak of fitness. What happens when there are intruders especially ones that do not contribute to any work required for foraging? <i>Drosophila</i> larvae secrete digestive enzymes and exodigest food. Under crowded conditions in liquid food these larvae form synchronized feeding clusters which provides a fitness benefit. A key for this synchronized feeding behavior is the visually guided alignment between adjacent larvae in a feeding cluster. Larvae who do not align their movements are excluded from the groups and subsequently lose the benefit. This may be a way of editing the group to include only known members. To test the model, the fitness benefit from cooperative behavior was further investigated to establish an Allee effect for a number of strains including those who cannot exodigest or cluster. In a standard lab vial, about 40 larvae is the optimal number for fitness. Combinations of these larvae were also examined. The expectation was that larvae who do not contribute to exodigestion are obligate cheaters and would be expelled. Indeed, obligate cheaters gain greatly from the hosts but paradoxically, so do the hosts. Clusters that include cheaters are more stable. Therefore, clustering and the benefits from it are dependent on more than just the contribution to exodigestion. This experimental system should provide a rich future model to understand the metrics of cooperative behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":15397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Physiology A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Physiology A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-024-01701-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cooperative foraging behavior can be advantageous when there is a common exploitable resource. By cooperating, members of the group can take advantage of the potential of increased efficiency of working together as well as equitable distribution of the product. An experimental signature of cooperative foraging is an Allee effect where at a certain number of individuals, there is a peak of fitness. What happens when there are intruders especially ones that do not contribute to any work required for foraging? Drosophila larvae secrete digestive enzymes and exodigest food. Under crowded conditions in liquid food these larvae form synchronized feeding clusters which provides a fitness benefit. A key for this synchronized feeding behavior is the visually guided alignment between adjacent larvae in a feeding cluster. Larvae who do not align their movements are excluded from the groups and subsequently lose the benefit. This may be a way of editing the group to include only known members. To test the model, the fitness benefit from cooperative behavior was further investigated to establish an Allee effect for a number of strains including those who cannot exodigest or cluster. In a standard lab vial, about 40 larvae is the optimal number for fitness. Combinations of these larvae were also examined. The expectation was that larvae who do not contribute to exodigestion are obligate cheaters and would be expelled. Indeed, obligate cheaters gain greatly from the hosts but paradoxically, so do the hosts. Clusters that include cheaters are more stable. Therefore, clustering and the benefits from it are dependent on more than just the contribution to exodigestion. This experimental system should provide a rich future model to understand the metrics of cooperative behavior.

Abstract Image

果蝇幼虫合作觅食的种群参数
在有共同可开发资源的情况下,合作觅食行为是有利的。通过合作,群体成员可以提高工作效率,公平分配产品。合作觅食的一个实验特征是阿利效应(Allee effect)。如果有入侵者,尤其是对觅食工作没有贡献的入侵者,会发生什么情况呢?果蝇幼虫会分泌消化酶并排泄食物。在液态食物拥挤的条件下,这些幼虫会形成同步进食群,从而为个体带来益处。这种同步进食行为的关键在于进食群中相邻幼虫之间在视觉引导下的对齐。动作不一致的幼虫会被排除在群体之外,从而失去这种益处。这可能是一种编辑群体的方法,使其只包括已知成员。为了验证该模型,我们进一步研究了合作行为带来的适生效益,以确定一些品系的阿利效应,包括那些不能外消化或集群的品系。在一个标准的实验瓶中,大约 40 只幼虫是最适合的数量。我们还研究了这些幼虫的组合。我们的预期是,不参与外消化的幼虫是强制性作弊者,会被驱逐。事实上,作弊者从宿主那里获得了巨大的收益,但矛盾的是,宿主也是如此。包含欺骗者的集群更加稳定。因此,集群和集群带来的好处不仅仅取决于对外消化的贡献。这个实验系统将为未来了解合作行为的度量标准提供一个丰富的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信