Co-occurrence and cognitive basis of low language and low reading skills in children speaking a transparent language

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joanna Kamykowska, Magdalena Łuniewska, Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Ewa Czaplewska, Magdalena Kochańska, Grzegorz Krajewski, Agnieszka Maryniak, Katarzyna Wiejak, Grażyna Krasowicz-Kupis, Ewa Haman
{"title":"Co-occurrence and cognitive basis of low language and low reading skills in children speaking a transparent language","authors":"Joanna Kamykowska, Magdalena Łuniewska, Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Ewa Czaplewska, Magdalena Kochańska, Grzegorz Krajewski, Agnieszka Maryniak, Katarzyna Wiejak, Grażyna Krasowicz-Kupis, Ewa Haman","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10537-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated the comorbidity of low language and reading skills in 6- to 8-year-old monolingual Polish-speaking children (<i>N</i> = 962) using three different approaches: norming data to determine the prevalence of co-morbid difficulties, group comparisons of profiles on key cognitive-linguistic measures, and a case series analysis examining the frequency of single versus multiple deficits. We identified four groups of children based on their oral language and reading skills: children with low oral language skills alone, low reading skills alone, comorbid low language/reading skills, and typically developing chronological-age controls. We characterized the four groups (<i>n</i> = 38 per group) in terms of oral language and reading skills measured with normed test batteries, and in terms of the cognitive-linguistic profiles measured by the phonological awareness test (PA), rapid automatized naming test (RAN), and nonword repetition tests (NWR). We found that 24–31% of children with one type of difficulty had comorbid difficulties in the other domain. All groups differed significantly in cognitive-linguistic profiles. For each measure, the comorbid group had the lowest results. The group of children with isolated low language skills had better results than the comorbid group in (1) Sentence repetition (sub-test in an oral language test), (2) discrimination-based, blending-based, and elision-based PA sub-tests, (3) RAN (both digits and letters). The group with isolated low reading skills had better results than the comorbid group in: (1) discrimination-based PA sub-test, (2) NWR tests. The results indicate differences in cognitive-linguistic profiles between the groups with low language and/or low reading skills. They highlight the need to control for both types of difficulties in researching low language and/or reading skills, and to screen for comorbid issues while diagnosing children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10537-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the comorbidity of low language and reading skills in 6- to 8-year-old monolingual Polish-speaking children (N = 962) using three different approaches: norming data to determine the prevalence of co-morbid difficulties, group comparisons of profiles on key cognitive-linguistic measures, and a case series analysis examining the frequency of single versus multiple deficits. We identified four groups of children based on their oral language and reading skills: children with low oral language skills alone, low reading skills alone, comorbid low language/reading skills, and typically developing chronological-age controls. We characterized the four groups (n = 38 per group) in terms of oral language and reading skills measured with normed test batteries, and in terms of the cognitive-linguistic profiles measured by the phonological awareness test (PA), rapid automatized naming test (RAN), and nonword repetition tests (NWR). We found that 24–31% of children with one type of difficulty had comorbid difficulties in the other domain. All groups differed significantly in cognitive-linguistic profiles. For each measure, the comorbid group had the lowest results. The group of children with isolated low language skills had better results than the comorbid group in (1) Sentence repetition (sub-test in an oral language test), (2) discrimination-based, blending-based, and elision-based PA sub-tests, (3) RAN (both digits and letters). The group with isolated low reading skills had better results than the comorbid group in: (1) discrimination-based PA sub-test, (2) NWR tests. The results indicate differences in cognitive-linguistic profiles between the groups with low language and/or low reading skills. They highlight the need to control for both types of difficulties in researching low language and/or reading skills, and to screen for comorbid issues while diagnosing children.

Abstract Image

讲透明语言的儿童低语言能力和低阅读能力的并存现象和认知基础
我们采用三种不同的方法对 6 至 8 岁单语波兰语儿童(962 人)的语言和阅读能力低下的合并症进行了研究:通过常模数据确定合并症的发生率;对主要认知语言测量指标的概况进行分组比较;以及对单项缺陷和多项缺陷的频率进行病例系列分析。我们根据儿童的口语和阅读能力确定了四组儿童:单纯口语能力低下的儿童、单纯阅读能力低下的儿童、合并语言/阅读能力低下的儿童以及发育正常的正常年龄对照组。我们对这四组儿童(每组 38 人)的口语和阅读能力进行了标准测试,并通过语音意识测试 (PA)、快速自动命名测试 (RAN) 和非词重复测试 (NWR) 测定了他们的认知语言特征。我们发现,24%-31% 患有一种语言障碍的儿童合并有另一种语言障碍。所有组别在认知语言方面都有明显差异。在每项测量中,合并组的结果都是最低的。在(1)句子复述(口语测试中的子测试)、(2)基于辨别的、基于混合的和基于省略的 PA 子测试、(3)RAN(包括数字和字母)方面,孤立的语言能力低下儿童组的成绩优于合并组。阅读能力较弱组在以下方面的成绩优于合并组:(1) 基于辨别力的 PA 次测试,(2) NWR 测试。这些结果表明,低语言能力和/或低阅读能力组之间在认知语言方面存在差异。这突出表明,在研究低语言能力和/或低阅读能力时,有必要控制这两种类型的困难,并在诊断儿童时筛查合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Reading and writing skills are fundamental to literacy. Consequently, the processes involved in reading and writing and the failure to acquire these skills, as well as the loss of once well-developed reading and writing abilities have been the targets of intense research activity involving professionals from a variety of disciplines, such as neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics and education. The findings that have emanated from this research are most often written up in a lingua that is specific to the particular discipline involved, and are published in specialized journals. This generally leaves the expert in one area almost totally unaware of what may be taking place in any area other than their own. Reading and Writing cuts through this fog of jargon, breaking down the artificial boundaries between disciplines. The journal focuses on the interaction among various fields, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Reading and Writing publishes high-quality, scientific articles pertaining to the processes, acquisition, and loss of reading and writing skills. The journal fully represents the necessarily interdisciplinary nature of research in the field, focusing on the interaction among various disciplines, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Coverage in Reading and Writing includes models of reading, writing and spelling at all age levels; orthography and its relation to reading and writing; computer literacy; cross-cultural studies; and developmental and acquired disorders of reading and writing. It publishes research articles, critical reviews, theoretical papers, and case studies. Reading and Writing is one of the most highly cited journals in Education, Educational Research, and Educational Psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信