Erin E Gabriel, Michael C Sachs, Andreas Kryger Jensen
{"title":"Sharp symbolic nonparametric bounds for measures of benefit in observational and imperfect randomized studies with ordinal outcomes","authors":"Erin E Gabriel, Michael C Sachs, Andreas Kryger Jensen","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asae020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The probability of benefit is a valuable and meaningful measure of treatment effect, which has advantages over the average treatment effect. Particularly for an ordinal outcome, it has a better interpretation and can make apparent different aspects of the treatment impact. Unfortunately, this measure, and variations of it, are not identifiable even in randomized trials with perfect compliance. There is, for this reason, a long literature on nonparametric bounds for unidentifiable measures of benefit. These have primarily focused on perfect randomized trial settings and one or two specific estimands. We expand these bounds to observational settings with unmeasured confounders and imperfect randomized trials for all three estimands considered in the literature: the probability of benefit, the probability of no harm, and the relative treatment effect.","PeriodicalId":9001,"journal":{"name":"Biometrika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrika","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asae020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Summary The probability of benefit is a valuable and meaningful measure of treatment effect, which has advantages over the average treatment effect. Particularly for an ordinal outcome, it has a better interpretation and can make apparent different aspects of the treatment impact. Unfortunately, this measure, and variations of it, are not identifiable even in randomized trials with perfect compliance. There is, for this reason, a long literature on nonparametric bounds for unidentifiable measures of benefit. These have primarily focused on perfect randomized trial settings and one or two specific estimands. We expand these bounds to observational settings with unmeasured confounders and imperfect randomized trials for all three estimands considered in the literature: the probability of benefit, the probability of no harm, and the relative treatment effect.
期刊介绍:
Biometrika is primarily a journal of statistics in which emphasis is placed on papers containing original theoretical contributions of direct or potential value in applications. From time to time, papers in bordering fields are also published.