Pilot study exploring the presence of leadership curricula in undergraduate medical education

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Melanie Korndorffer, Michael A Dewsnap, Erin S Barry, Neil Grunberg, David W Musick, Joann Farrell Quinn
{"title":"Pilot study exploring the presence of leadership curricula in undergraduate medical education","authors":"Melanie Korndorffer, Michael A Dewsnap, Erin S Barry, Neil Grunberg, David W Musick, Joann Farrell Quinn","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The physician’s role in the healthcare delivery system extends beyond patient care to include numerous critical leadership roles in healthcare. In addition to treating patients, physicians manage multidisciplinary teams and influence policies to optimise public health. Yet, leadership education is not currently emphasised as part of undergraduate medical education. The purpose of this pilot study was to survey US allopathic medical schools about their current leadership curricula for medical students, including aspects that promote or inhibit effective curricular implementation. Methods A survey was developed and administered to representatives at US allopathic medical schools regarding the presence and nature of leadership curricula for medical students currently in place, as well as barriers to effective implementation. Results A total of 41 of 144 medical schools (28%) responded to the survey. Of the schools that responded, 25 schools reported the presence of a leadership curriculum. Primary competencies and goals were similar among these institutions, but the structure of the curriculum and how it is being implemented varied. The study did not identify consistent methods of assessing student leadership competencies. Themes of improved communication and integration within the curriculum emerged as actions promoting successful implementation. Financial restraints and buy-in among stakeholder groups (eg, faculty, staff and students) were mentioned most frequently as barriers to the effective implementation of leadership curricula. Conclusions Although leadership education within undergraduate medical education is emphasised by a variety of groups, including the Association of American Medical Colleges, medical schools do not appear to universally address this topic. The Liaison Committee on Medical Education, the primary accrediting body for medical schools, does not currently require leadership education as a core topic for accreditation. To provide effective education on leadership to medical students, administrative bodies could improve their support for this topic by considering the factors identified that both hinder and promote implementation. Data are available upon reasonable request. Survey data may be furnished upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The physician’s role in the healthcare delivery system extends beyond patient care to include numerous critical leadership roles in healthcare. In addition to treating patients, physicians manage multidisciplinary teams and influence policies to optimise public health. Yet, leadership education is not currently emphasised as part of undergraduate medical education. The purpose of this pilot study was to survey US allopathic medical schools about their current leadership curricula for medical students, including aspects that promote or inhibit effective curricular implementation. Methods A survey was developed and administered to representatives at US allopathic medical schools regarding the presence and nature of leadership curricula for medical students currently in place, as well as barriers to effective implementation. Results A total of 41 of 144 medical schools (28%) responded to the survey. Of the schools that responded, 25 schools reported the presence of a leadership curriculum. Primary competencies and goals were similar among these institutions, but the structure of the curriculum and how it is being implemented varied. The study did not identify consistent methods of assessing student leadership competencies. Themes of improved communication and integration within the curriculum emerged as actions promoting successful implementation. Financial restraints and buy-in among stakeholder groups (eg, faculty, staff and students) were mentioned most frequently as barriers to the effective implementation of leadership curricula. Conclusions Although leadership education within undergraduate medical education is emphasised by a variety of groups, including the Association of American Medical Colleges, medical schools do not appear to universally address this topic. The Liaison Committee on Medical Education, the primary accrediting body for medical schools, does not currently require leadership education as a core topic for accreditation. To provide effective education on leadership to medical students, administrative bodies could improve their support for this topic by considering the factors identified that both hinder and promote implementation. Data are available upon reasonable request. Survey data may be furnished upon reasonable request.
探索本科医学教育中是否存在领导力课程的试点研究
导言:医生在医疗保健服务体系中的作用不仅限于治疗病人,还包括在医疗保健领域担任许多重要的领导角色。除了治疗病人,医生还管理多学科团队,影响政策以优化公共卫生。然而,领导力教育目前在本科医学教育中并未得到重视。这项试点研究的目的是调查美国对抗疗法医学院目前为医学生开设的领导力课程,包括促进或抑制课程有效实施的方面。方法 对美国对抗疗法医学院的代表进行了一项调查,内容涉及目前针对医学生的领导力课程的存在和性质,以及有效实施的障碍。结果 144 所医学院中共有 41 所(28%)对调查做出了回应。在回复的学校中,有 25 所学校表示开设了领导力课程。这些学校的主要能力和目标相似,但课程结构和实施方式各不相同。研究没有发现评估学生领导能力的一致方法。改进沟通和课程整合是促进课程成功实施的主题。资金限制和利益相关群体(如教职员工和学生)的认同是最常被提及的阻碍领导力课程有效实施的因素。结论 尽管包括美国医学院校协会在内的各种团体都强调本科医学教育中的领导力教育,但医学院校似乎并没有普遍解决这一问题。医学教育联络委员会是医学院校的主要评审机构,目前并未要求将领导力教育作为评审的核心主题。为了向医学生提供有效的领导力教育,行政管理机构可以通过考虑已发现的阻碍和促进实施的因素,改善对这一主题的支持。如有合理要求,可提供数据。如有合理要求,可提供调查数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信