Comparing hospital leadership and front-line workers’ perceptions of patient safety culture: an unbalanced panel study

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jayson Forbes, Alejandro Arrieta
{"title":"Comparing hospital leadership and front-line workers’ perceptions of patient safety culture: an unbalanced panel study","authors":"Jayson Forbes, Alejandro Arrieta","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/aim This article examines the relationships between workers’ hospital leadership status, hospital front-line status and patient safety culture in hospitals throughout the USA. By identifying possible disparities in perception, targeted interventions can aim at decreasing differences between the two groups to increase the quality of healthcare. Method Data from 1 739 083 individuals, spreading across 1810 hospitals between 2008 and 2017 were collected. 115 228 (6.63%) self-identified as leaders, and 772 505 (44.42%) self-identified as front-line workers. The participants also filled in information describing their demographics in reference to the hospital, such as how long they have worked at the facility, their working unit and their occupation. Results Results showed that leaders responded more positively to items that are directly related to management, such as ‘my supervisor/manager says a good word when he/she sees a job done according to established patient safety procedures’ (0.33, p<0.01), where 0.33 signifies that leaders had an average response more positive by 0.33 compared with all other occupations on a Likert scale of 1–5. Based on multiple F-tests, all items have shown a statistical significance between leadership and front-line groups. Conclusion The findings highlight a compelling link between leadership roles and patient safety culture in hospitals, as well as between front-line worker status and patient safety culture. Moreover, a pronounced divergence in viewpoints regarding patient safety culture exists between hospital leaders and front-line staff. An in-depth investigation is necessary to comprehend the ramifications of these outcomes. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Deidentified participant data-Contact: SOPSResearchData@westat.com- Website: <https://www.ahrq.gov/sops/databases/research-datasets.html>- Reuse: Must send data request form to above contact. The SOPS data used in this analysis was provided by the SOPS Database. The SOPS Database is funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and administered by Westat under Contract Number HHSP233201500026I/HHSP23337004T.","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim This article examines the relationships between workers’ hospital leadership status, hospital front-line status and patient safety culture in hospitals throughout the USA. By identifying possible disparities in perception, targeted interventions can aim at decreasing differences between the two groups to increase the quality of healthcare. Method Data from 1 739 083 individuals, spreading across 1810 hospitals between 2008 and 2017 were collected. 115 228 (6.63%) self-identified as leaders, and 772 505 (44.42%) self-identified as front-line workers. The participants also filled in information describing their demographics in reference to the hospital, such as how long they have worked at the facility, their working unit and their occupation. Results Results showed that leaders responded more positively to items that are directly related to management, such as ‘my supervisor/manager says a good word when he/she sees a job done according to established patient safety procedures’ (0.33, p<0.01), where 0.33 signifies that leaders had an average response more positive by 0.33 compared with all other occupations on a Likert scale of 1–5. Based on multiple F-tests, all items have shown a statistical significance between leadership and front-line groups. Conclusion The findings highlight a compelling link between leadership roles and patient safety culture in hospitals, as well as between front-line worker status and patient safety culture. Moreover, a pronounced divergence in viewpoints regarding patient safety culture exists between hospital leaders and front-line staff. An in-depth investigation is necessary to comprehend the ramifications of these outcomes. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Deidentified participant data-Contact: SOPSResearchData@westat.com- Website: - Reuse: Must send data request form to above contact. The SOPS data used in this analysis was provided by the SOPS Database. The SOPS Database is funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and administered by Westat under Contract Number HHSP233201500026I/HHSP23337004T.
比较医院领导和一线员工对患者安全文化的看法:一项非平衡小组研究
背景/目的 本文研究了美国各地医院中工人的医院领导地位、医院一线地位和患者安全文化之间的关系。通过识别可能存在的认知差异,有针对性地采取干预措施,以减少两组之间的差异,提高医疗质量。方法 收集了 2008 年至 2017 年间分布在 1810 家医院的 1 739 083 人的数据。其中 115 228 人(6.63%)自认为是领导者,772 505 人(44.42%)自认为是一线工作者。参与者还填写了与医院有关的人口统计学信息,如在医院工作的时间、工作单位和职业。结果显示,领导者对与管理直接相关的项目反应更积极,如 "当我的主管/经理看到一项工作按照既定的患者安全程序完成时,他会说一句好话"(0.33,p- 重复使用:必须向上述联系人发送数据申请表。本分析中使用的 SOPS 数据由 SOPS 数据库提供。SOPS 数据库由美国医疗保健研究与质量局 (AHRQ) 资助,由 Westat 管理,合同编号为 HHSP233201500026I/HHSP23337004T。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信