(Pseudo-)Synthetic BRST quantisation of the bosonic string and the higher quantum origin of dualities

Andrei T. Patrascu
{"title":"(Pseudo-)Synthetic BRST quantisation of the bosonic string and the higher quantum origin of dualities","authors":"Andrei T. Patrascu","doi":"arxiv-2404.06522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I am arguing in favour of the hypothesis that the origin of\ngauge and string dualities in general can be found in a higher-categorical\ninterpretation of basic quantum mechanics. It is interesting to observe that\nthe Galilei group has a non-trivial cohomology, while the Lorentz/Poincare\ngroup has trivial cohomology. When we constructed quantum mechanics, we noticed\nthe non-trivial cohomology structure of the Galilei group and hence, we\nrequired for a proper quantisation procedure that would be compatible with the\nsymmetry group of our theory, to go to a central extension of the Galilei group\nuniversal covering by co-cycle. This would be the Bargmann group. However,\nNature didn't choose this path. Instead in nature, the Galilei group is not\nrealised, while the Lorentz group is. The fact that the Galilei group has\ntopological obstructions leads to a central charge, the mass, and a\nsuperselection rule, required to implement the Galilei symmetry, that forbids\ntransitions between states of different mass. The topological structure of the\nLorentz group however lacks such an obstruction, and hence allows for\ntransitions between states of different mass. The connectivity structure of the\nLorentz group as opposed to that of the Galilei group can be interpreted in the\nsense of an ER=EPR duality for the topological space associated to group\ncohomology. In string theory we started with the Witt algebra, and due to\nsimilar quantisation issues, we employed the central extension by co-cycle to\nobtain the Virasoro algebra. This is a unique extension for orientation\npreserving diffeomorphisms on a circle, but there is no reason to believe that,\nat the high energy domain in physics where this would apply, we do not have a\ntotally different structure altogether and the degrees of freedom present there\nwould require something vastly more general and global.","PeriodicalId":501190,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.06522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article I am arguing in favour of the hypothesis that the origin of gauge and string dualities in general can be found in a higher-categorical interpretation of basic quantum mechanics. It is interesting to observe that the Galilei group has a non-trivial cohomology, while the Lorentz/Poincare group has trivial cohomology. When we constructed quantum mechanics, we noticed the non-trivial cohomology structure of the Galilei group and hence, we required for a proper quantisation procedure that would be compatible with the symmetry group of our theory, to go to a central extension of the Galilei group universal covering by co-cycle. This would be the Bargmann group. However, Nature didn't choose this path. Instead in nature, the Galilei group is not realised, while the Lorentz group is. The fact that the Galilei group has topological obstructions leads to a central charge, the mass, and a superselection rule, required to implement the Galilei symmetry, that forbids transitions between states of different mass. The topological structure of the Lorentz group however lacks such an obstruction, and hence allows for transitions between states of different mass. The connectivity structure of the Lorentz group as opposed to that of the Galilei group can be interpreted in the sense of an ER=EPR duality for the topological space associated to group cohomology. In string theory we started with the Witt algebra, and due to similar quantisation issues, we employed the central extension by co-cycle to obtain the Virasoro algebra. This is a unique extension for orientation preserving diffeomorphisms on a circle, but there is no reason to believe that, at the high energy domain in physics where this would apply, we do not have a totally different structure altogether and the degrees of freedom present there would require something vastly more general and global.
(玻色弦的(伪)合成 BRST 量子化与对偶性的高量子起源
在这篇文章中,我支持这样一个假设,即一般而言,量规和弦对偶性的起源可以在对基本量子力学的高阶诠释中找到。值得注意的是,伽利略群具有非三胞同调,而洛伦兹/庞加莱群具有三胞同调。当我们构建量子力学时,我们注意到伽利略群的非三重同调结构,因此,我们要求有一个与我们理论的对称群相容的适当的量子化过程,即伽利略群的中心扩展,通过共循环进行普遍覆盖。这就是巴格曼群。然而,大自然并没有选择这条道路。相反,在自然界中,伽利略群没有被意识到,而洛伦兹群却被意识到了。事实上,伽利略群具有拓扑障碍,这导致了一个中心电荷,即质量,以及实现伽利略对称性所需的上选规则,它禁止不同质量的状态之间发生转换。然而,洛伦兹群的拓扑结构不存在这种障碍,因此允许不同质量的状态之间发生转换。相对于伽利略群,洛伦兹群的连通性结构可以从与群同调相关的拓扑空间的ER=EPR对偶性的意义上解释。在弦理论中,我们从维特代数开始,由于类似的量子化问题,我们采用了共循环的中心扩展,得到了维拉索罗代数。这是圆上保向差分变形的独特扩展,但我们没有理由相信,在物理学的高能量领域,我们没有完全不同的结构,那里存在的自由度需要更为广义和全局的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信