Phosphorus Uptake Capacity of 14-Year-Old Loblolly Pine as Indicated by a 32P Root Bioassay

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Kurt D. Pennell, H. Lee Allen, William A. Jackson
{"title":"Phosphorus Uptake Capacity of 14-Year-Old Loblolly Pine as Indicated by a 32P Root Bioassay","authors":"Kurt D. Pennell, H. Lee Allen, William A. Jackson","doi":"10.1093/forestscience/36.2.358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excised loblolly pine roots were exposed to a 32p-labelled solution for 20 minutes to measure their capacity for P uptake. On five dates from March 1985 to March 1986, root samples were collected from 14-year-old loblolly pine which had received 101 kg P · ha-1 and 0 kg P · ha-1 when they were planted. Phosphorus uptake by roots of nonfertilized loblolly pine (1.10 μmol P · g-1 · hr-1) was significantly greater than that by roots of fertilized loblolly pine (0.72 μmol P · g-1 · hr-1) when sampled between June and October, but no difference was detected when sampled in March. Phosphorus uptake was decreased by approximately 50% at 7°C compared to 25°C, and in the presence of metabolic inhibitors. Phosphorus concentrations, measured after the bioassay, of roots from fertilized trees (0.93 g P · kg-1) were significantly greater than those of roots from nonfertilized trees (0.45 g P · kg-1) on all five sampling dates. Capacity for root P uptake did not have an advantage over root or foliar P concentrations as an indicator of P stress, and does not appear to be a practical diagnostic tool for semimature loblolly pine. For. Sci. 36(2):358-366.","PeriodicalId":12749,"journal":{"name":"Forest Science","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/36.2.358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excised loblolly pine roots were exposed to a 32p-labelled solution for 20 minutes to measure their capacity for P uptake. On five dates from March 1985 to March 1986, root samples were collected from 14-year-old loblolly pine which had received 101 kg P · ha-1 and 0 kg P · ha-1 when they were planted. Phosphorus uptake by roots of nonfertilized loblolly pine (1.10 μmol P · g-1 · hr-1) was significantly greater than that by roots of fertilized loblolly pine (0.72 μmol P · g-1 · hr-1) when sampled between June and October, but no difference was detected when sampled in March. Phosphorus uptake was decreased by approximately 50% at 7°C compared to 25°C, and in the presence of metabolic inhibitors. Phosphorus concentrations, measured after the bioassay, of roots from fertilized trees (0.93 g P · kg-1) were significantly greater than those of roots from nonfertilized trees (0.45 g P · kg-1) on all five sampling dates. Capacity for root P uptake did not have an advantage over root or foliar P concentrations as an indicator of P stress, and does not appear to be a practical diagnostic tool for semimature loblolly pine. For. Sci. 36(2):358-366.
32P 根部生物测定显示的 14 年生小叶松磷吸收能力
将切除的小叶松根暴露在 32p 标记溶液中 20 分钟,以测量其吸收 P 的能力。在 1985 年 3 月至 1986 年 3 月的五个日期,从 14 年树龄的小叶松根部采集了样本,这些小叶松在种植时分别吸收了 101 千克 P - ha-1 和 0 千克 P - ha-1。在 6 月至 10 月采样时,未施肥小叶女贞的根系对磷的吸收量(1.10 μmol P - g-1 - hr-1)明显高于施肥小叶女贞的根系对磷的吸收量(0.72 μmol P - g-1 - hr-1),但在 3 月采样时未发现差异。与 25 摄氏度相比,在 7 摄氏度和存在代谢抑制剂的情况下,磷的吸收量减少了约 50%。在所有五个取样日期,生物测定后测量的施肥树木根部的磷浓度(0.93 g P - kg-1)都明显高于未施肥树木根部的磷浓度(0.45 g P - kg-1)。根系吸收 P 的能力作为 P 压力的指标,与根系或叶片 P 浓度相比没有优势,似乎不是半成熟小叶松的实用诊断工具。对于小叶松来说,这似乎并不是一个实用的诊断工具。36(2):358-366.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Science
Forest Science 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management. Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信