Experimental Analysis of Deep Hedging Using Artificial Market Simulations for Underlying Asset Simulators

Masanori Hirano
{"title":"Experimental Analysis of Deep Hedging Using Artificial Market Simulations for Underlying Asset Simulators","authors":"Masanori Hirano","doi":"arxiv-2404.09462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Derivative hedging and pricing are important and continuously studied topics\nin financial markets. Recently, deep hedging has been proposed as a promising\napproach that uses deep learning to approximate the optimal hedging strategy\nand can handle incomplete markets. However, deep hedging usually requires\nunderlying asset simulations, and it is challenging to select the best model\nfor such simulations. This study proposes a new approach using artificial\nmarket simulations for underlying asset simulations in deep hedging. Artificial\nmarket simulations can replicate the stylized facts of financial markets, and\nthey seem to be a promising approach for deep hedging. We investigate the\neffectiveness of the proposed approach by comparing its results with those of\nthe traditional approach, which uses mathematical finance models such as\nBrownian motion and Heston models for underlying asset simulations. The results\nshow that the proposed approach can achieve almost the same level of\nperformance as the traditional approach without mathematical finance models.\nFinally, we also reveal that the proposed approach has some limitations in\nterms of performance under certain conditions.","PeriodicalId":501294,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Computational Finance","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Computational Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.09462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Derivative hedging and pricing are important and continuously studied topics in financial markets. Recently, deep hedging has been proposed as a promising approach that uses deep learning to approximate the optimal hedging strategy and can handle incomplete markets. However, deep hedging usually requires underlying asset simulations, and it is challenging to select the best model for such simulations. This study proposes a new approach using artificial market simulations for underlying asset simulations in deep hedging. Artificial market simulations can replicate the stylized facts of financial markets, and they seem to be a promising approach for deep hedging. We investigate the effectiveness of the proposed approach by comparing its results with those of the traditional approach, which uses mathematical finance models such as Brownian motion and Heston models for underlying asset simulations. The results show that the proposed approach can achieve almost the same level of performance as the traditional approach without mathematical finance models. Finally, we also reveal that the proposed approach has some limitations in terms of performance under certain conditions.
利用人工市场模拟进行深度套期保值的基础资产模拟器实验分析
衍生品对冲和定价是金融市场中重要且持续研究的课题。最近,深度套期保值作为一种很有前途的方法被提出来,它利用深度学习来逼近最优套期保值策略,并能处理不完全市场。然而,深度对冲通常需要底层资产模拟,而为这种模拟选择最佳模式具有挑战性。本研究提出了一种在深度对冲中使用人工市场模拟进行基础资产模拟的新方法。人工市场模拟可以复制金融市场的典型事实,似乎是一种很有前途的深度对冲方法。我们将所提出的方法与使用布朗运动和赫斯顿模型等数学金融模型进行基础资产模拟的传统方法的结果进行了比较,从而研究了其有效性。结果表明,所提出的方法与不使用数学金融模型的传统方法几乎可以达到相同的性能水平。最后,我们还揭示了所提出的方法在某些条件下的性能方面存在一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信