Childlessness, Social Network Profiles in Midlife and Late Adulthood, and Their Implications for Subjective Well-being

Bussarawan Teerawichitchainan, Dahye Kim, Christine Ho
{"title":"Childlessness, Social Network Profiles in Midlife and Late Adulthood, and Their Implications for Subjective Well-being","authors":"Bussarawan Teerawichitchainan, Dahye Kim, Christine Ho","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Despite the rising prevalence of individuals reaching advanced age without children, little is known about the diversity in support networks within childless populations. We examine the network profiles of childless adults aged 50+ in Singapore, which observes high childlessness rates despite societal emphasis on familism. Methods We employ latent class analysis to derive network typology based on a 2022 nationwide survey in Singapore. Additionally, we use logistic regression analyses to investigate the sociodemographic correlates of childless individuals’ network types and the associations between these network types and subjective well-being. Results Childless Singaporeans form a heterogeneous group characterized by different support networks. Evidence suggests the centrality of parents in the childless’ social networks and the continuity of parent-child support exchanges that extend into the child’s midlife and late adulthood. When parents are absent, siblings/extended kin serve as their support sources. Age, sibship size, and socioeconomic status are key correlates of network types. Membership in diverse networks is beneficial to the subjective well-being of childless individuals. Although one-fifth of childless individuals in restricted networks demonstrate significantly poorer well-being, the remaining four-fifths show comparable, if not better, well-being than the non-childless. Discussion Results underscore the importance of differentiating network types among the childless, particularly when assessing their well-being. Contrary to the notion associating later-life childlessness with social isolation and vulnerabilities, many childless Singaporeans manage to construct non-child-based networks equipped with various supportive relations that cater to their needs. Nevertheless, persistent vulnerabilities among restricted network members deserve policymakers’ attention.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Despite the rising prevalence of individuals reaching advanced age without children, little is known about the diversity in support networks within childless populations. We examine the network profiles of childless adults aged 50+ in Singapore, which observes high childlessness rates despite societal emphasis on familism. Methods We employ latent class analysis to derive network typology based on a 2022 nationwide survey in Singapore. Additionally, we use logistic regression analyses to investigate the sociodemographic correlates of childless individuals’ network types and the associations between these network types and subjective well-being. Results Childless Singaporeans form a heterogeneous group characterized by different support networks. Evidence suggests the centrality of parents in the childless’ social networks and the continuity of parent-child support exchanges that extend into the child’s midlife and late adulthood. When parents are absent, siblings/extended kin serve as their support sources. Age, sibship size, and socioeconomic status are key correlates of network types. Membership in diverse networks is beneficial to the subjective well-being of childless individuals. Although one-fifth of childless individuals in restricted networks demonstrate significantly poorer well-being, the remaining four-fifths show comparable, if not better, well-being than the non-childless. Discussion Results underscore the importance of differentiating network types among the childless, particularly when assessing their well-being. Contrary to the notion associating later-life childlessness with social isolation and vulnerabilities, many childless Singaporeans manage to construct non-child-based networks equipped with various supportive relations that cater to their needs. Nevertheless, persistent vulnerabilities among restricted network members deserve policymakers’ attention.
无子女、中年和晚年的社交网络概况及其对主观幸福感的影响
研究目的 尽管无子女的高龄人群越来越多,但人们对无子女人群支持网络的多样性却知之甚少。我们研究了新加坡 50 岁以上无子女成年人的网络概况,尽管社会强调家庭主义,但新加坡的无子女率却很高。方法 我们根据 2022 年在新加坡进行的一项全国性调查,采用潜类分析法得出网络类型。此外,我们还使用逻辑回归分析来研究无子女个人网络类型的社会人口学相关因素,以及这些网络类型与主观幸福感之间的关联。结果 无子女的新加坡人组成了一个异质群体,他们的支持网络各不相同。有证据表明,父母在无子女者的社会网络中处于中心地位,父母与子女之间的支持交流一直延续到子女的中年和成年晚期。当父母不在时,兄弟姐妹/远亲就会成为他们的支持来源。年龄、兄弟姐妹人数和社会经济地位是网络类型的主要相关因素。加入多样化的网络有利于无子女者的主观幸福感。虽然在受限网络中,五分之一的无子女者的幸福感明显较差,但其余五分之四的无子女者的幸福感与非无子女者相当,甚至更好。讨论 结果表明,区分无子女者的网络类型非常重要,尤其是在评估他们的幸福感时。与晚年无子女与社会孤立和脆弱性相关联的观念相反,许多无子女的新加坡人设法构建了非子女网络,其中配备了各种支持性关系,以满足他们的需求。然而,受限制的网络成员中持续存在的脆弱性值得政策制定者关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信