Hegemony, global capitalism and the role of diplomacy in extractive industries

Jane Andrew, Max Baker
{"title":"Hegemony, global capitalism and the role of diplomacy in extractive industries","authors":"Jane Andrew, Max Baker","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-03-2023-6353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study explores a hegemonic alliance and the role of relational forms of accounting and accountablity in the making of contemporary capitalism.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We use the WikiLeaks “Cablegate” documents to provide an account of the detailed machinations between interest groups (corporations and the state) that are constitutive of hegemonic activity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Our analysis of the “Cablegate” documents shows that the US and Chevron were crafting a central role for Turkmenistan and its president on the global political stage as early as 2007, despite offical reporting beginning only in 2009. The documents exemplify how “accountability gaps” occlude the understanding of interdependence between capital and the state.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study contributes to a growing idea that official accounts offer a fictionalized narrative of corporations as existing independently, and thus expands the boundaries associated with studying multinational corporate activities to include their interdependencies with the modern state.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The study traces how global capitalism extends into new territories through diplomatic channels, as a strategic initiative between powerful state and capital interests, arguing that the outcome is the empowerment of authoritarian states at the cost of democracy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study argues that previous accounting and accountability research has overlooked the larger picture of how capital and the state work together to secure a mutual hegemonic interest. We advocate for a more complete account of these activities that circumvents official, often restricted, views of global capitalism.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501027,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2023-6353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study explores a hegemonic alliance and the role of relational forms of accounting and accountablity in the making of contemporary capitalism.

Design/methodology/approach

We use the WikiLeaks “Cablegate” documents to provide an account of the detailed machinations between interest groups (corporations and the state) that are constitutive of hegemonic activity.

Findings

Our analysis of the “Cablegate” documents shows that the US and Chevron were crafting a central role for Turkmenistan and its president on the global political stage as early as 2007, despite offical reporting beginning only in 2009. The documents exemplify how “accountability gaps” occlude the understanding of interdependence between capital and the state.

Research limitations/implications

The study contributes to a growing idea that official accounts offer a fictionalized narrative of corporations as existing independently, and thus expands the boundaries associated with studying multinational corporate activities to include their interdependencies with the modern state.

Social implications

The study traces how global capitalism extends into new territories through diplomatic channels, as a strategic initiative between powerful state and capital interests, arguing that the outcome is the empowerment of authoritarian states at the cost of democracy.

Originality/value

The study argues that previous accounting and accountability research has overlooked the larger picture of how capital and the state work together to secure a mutual hegemonic interest. We advocate for a more complete account of these activities that circumvents official, often restricted, views of global capitalism.

霸权、全球资本主义和外交在采掘业中的作用
设计/方法/途径我们利用维基解密的 "电缆门 "文件,对构成霸权活动的利益集团(企业和国家)之间的详细阴谋进行了阐述。研究结果我们对 "电缆门 "文件的分析表明,早在 2007 年,美国和雪佛龙公司就在为土库曼斯坦及其总统在全球政治舞台上扮演核心角色而精心策划,尽管官方报道从 2009 年才开始。研究局限性/启示本研究为一种日益增长的观点做出了贡献,即官方报告虚构了公司独立存在的事实,从而扩大了研究跨国公司活动的范围,将其与现代国家的相互依存关系纳入其中。社会影响该研究追踪了全球资本主义如何通过外交渠道扩展到新的领土,作为强大的国家和资本利益之间的战略举措,认为其结果是以民主为代价增强了专制国家的权力。我们主张对这些活动进行更全面的阐述,以规避官方对全球资本主义的观点(往往是受限制的观点)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信