{"title":"How sustainability assurance work gets done: assurors’ sensemaking, socialization and interactions with clients","authors":"Lies Bouten, Sophie Hoozée","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-08-2022-5973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study examines how assurors make sense of sustainability assurance (SA) work and how interactions with assurance team members and clients shape assurors’ sensemaking and their actual SA work.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>To obtain detailed accounts of how SA work occurs on the ground, this study explores three SA engagements by interviewing the main actors involved, both at the client firms and at their Big Four assurance providers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Individual assurors’ (i.e. partners and other team members) sensemaking of SA work results in the crafting of their logics of action (LoAs), that is, their meanings about the objectives of SA work and how to conduct it. Without organizational socialization, team members may not arrive at shared meanings and deviate from the team-wide assurance approach. To fulfill their objectives for SA work, assurors may engage in socialization with clients or assume a temporary role. Yet, the role negotiations taking place in the shadows of the scope negotiations determine their default role during the engagement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Two options are available to help SA statement users gauge the relevance of SA work: either displaying the SA work performed or making it more uniform.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study theoretically grounds how assurors make sense of SA work and documents how (the lack of) professional socialization, organizational socialization and socialization of frequent interaction partners at the client shape actual SA work. Thereby, it unravels the SA work concealed behind SA statements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501027,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal ","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-08-2022-5973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study examines how assurors make sense of sustainability assurance (SA) work and how interactions with assurance team members and clients shape assurors’ sensemaking and their actual SA work.
Design/methodology/approach
To obtain detailed accounts of how SA work occurs on the ground, this study explores three SA engagements by interviewing the main actors involved, both at the client firms and at their Big Four assurance providers.
Findings
Individual assurors’ (i.e. partners and other team members) sensemaking of SA work results in the crafting of their logics of action (LoAs), that is, their meanings about the objectives of SA work and how to conduct it. Without organizational socialization, team members may not arrive at shared meanings and deviate from the team-wide assurance approach. To fulfill their objectives for SA work, assurors may engage in socialization with clients or assume a temporary role. Yet, the role negotiations taking place in the shadows of the scope negotiations determine their default role during the engagement.
Practical implications
Two options are available to help SA statement users gauge the relevance of SA work: either displaying the SA work performed or making it more uniform.
Originality/value
This study theoretically grounds how assurors make sense of SA work and documents how (the lack of) professional socialization, organizational socialization and socialization of frequent interaction partners at the client shape actual SA work. Thereby, it unravels the SA work concealed behind SA statements.
本研究探讨了评估员如何理解可持续性评估(SA)工作,以及与评估团队成员和客户的互动如何影响评估员的感性认识及其实际的评估工作。为了详细了解评估工作的实际开展情况,本研究通过采访客户公司及其四大评估机构的主要参与者,对三项评估工作进行了探讨。研究结果个别担保人(即合伙人和其他团队成员)对担保工作的感性认识导致其行动逻辑(LoAs)的形成,即他们对担保工作目标和如何开展担保工作的理解。如果没有组织社会化,团队成员可能无法达成共同的意义,并偏离整个团队的保证方法。为了实现他们的 SA 工作目标,保证人可能会与客户进行社会化,或承担临时角色。本研究从理论上论证了担保人如何理解担保工作,并记录了(缺乏)专业社会化、组织社会化和客户频繁互动伙伴的社会化如何影响实际担保工作。因此,它揭示了隐藏在担保声明背后的担保工作。