Smallholder farms in the sustainable food transition: A critical examination of the new Common Agricultural Policy

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mirta Alessandrini, Edwin Alblas, Lin Batten, Sumira Bothé
{"title":"Smallholder farms in the sustainable food transition: A critical examination of the new Common Agricultural Policy","authors":"Mirta Alessandrini, Edwin Alblas, Lin Batten, Sumira Bothé","doi":"10.1111/reel.12539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost two thirds of working farms in the European Union are considered smallholder farms. These farms play a crucial role in local food production, rural development, maintaining agrobiodiversity, and promoting cultural heritage. Despite this, agricultural policies have consistently supported on‐farm intensification, specialisation, enlargement, and mechanisation of agricultural production. These policies have been in turn commonly justified through food security and agricultural efficiency arguments. Considering the European Union's Farm to Fork Strategy and the Green Deal's aims of transitioning towards sustainable food systems, this article presents a novel empirical analysis of the legal position of small farmers in the new Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of 2023. This analysis outlines the critical but complex position of smallholder farmers in the National Strategic Plans of 10 Member States. The reformed CAP increasingly acknowledges the important role of smallholder farmers in moving towards sustainable food systems. However, in this article, we question the CAP's sufficiency for improving the legal position of smallholders, promoting (economic) viability and harnessing the sustainability potential of smallholder farms.","PeriodicalId":51681,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","volume":"313 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Almost two thirds of working farms in the European Union are considered smallholder farms. These farms play a crucial role in local food production, rural development, maintaining agrobiodiversity, and promoting cultural heritage. Despite this, agricultural policies have consistently supported on‐farm intensification, specialisation, enlargement, and mechanisation of agricultural production. These policies have been in turn commonly justified through food security and agricultural efficiency arguments. Considering the European Union's Farm to Fork Strategy and the Green Deal's aims of transitioning towards sustainable food systems, this article presents a novel empirical analysis of the legal position of small farmers in the new Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of 2023. This analysis outlines the critical but complex position of smallholder farmers in the National Strategic Plans of 10 Member States. The reformed CAP increasingly acknowledges the important role of smallholder farmers in moving towards sustainable food systems. However, in this article, we question the CAP's sufficiency for improving the legal position of smallholders, promoting (economic) viability and harnessing the sustainability potential of smallholder farms.
可持续粮食转型中的小农农场:对新的共同农业政策的批判性研究
欧盟近三分之二的工作农场被视为小农农场。这些农场在当地粮食生产、农村发展、维护农业生物多样性和促进文化遗产方面发挥着至关重要的作用。尽管如此,农业政策一直支持农场集约化、专业化、规模化和农业生产机械化。这些政策通常又以粮食安全和农业效率为理由。考虑到欧盟的 "从农场到餐桌 "战略和 "绿色协议 "旨在向可持续粮食系统过渡,本文对 2023 年新的共同农业政策(CAP)中小农的法律地位进行了新颖的实证分析。该分析概述了小农在 10 个成员国的国家战略计划中所处的关键但复杂的地位。改革后的 CAP 越来越承认小农在迈向可持续粮食体系中的重要作用。然而,在本文中,我们对 CAP 是否足以改善小农的法律地位、促进(经济)可行性和利用小农农场的可持续发展潜力提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信