Dynamic borrowing of historical controls adjusting for covariates in vaccine efficacy clinical trials

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Andrea Callegaro, Yongyi Luo, Naveen Karkada, Toufik Zahaf
{"title":"Dynamic borrowing of historical controls adjusting for covariates in vaccine efficacy clinical trials","authors":"Andrea Callegaro, Yongyi Luo, Naveen Karkada, Toufik Zahaf","doi":"10.1002/pst.2384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional vaccine efficacy trials usually use fixed designs and often require large sample sizes. Recruiting a large number of subjects can make the trial expensive, long, and difficult to conduct. A possible approach to reduce the sample size and speed up the development is to use historical controls. In this paper, we extend the robust mixture prior (RMP) approach (a well established approach for Bayesian dynamic borrowing of historical controls) to adjust for covariates. The adjustment is done using classical methods from causal inference: inverse probability of treatment weighting, G‐computation and double‐robust estimation. We evaluate these covariate‐adjusted RMP approaches using a comprehensive simulation study and demonstrate their use by performing a retrospective analysis of a prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccine efficacy trial. Adjusting for covariates reduces the drift between current and historical controls, with a beneficial effect on bias, control of type I error and power.","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional vaccine efficacy trials usually use fixed designs and often require large sample sizes. Recruiting a large number of subjects can make the trial expensive, long, and difficult to conduct. A possible approach to reduce the sample size and speed up the development is to use historical controls. In this paper, we extend the robust mixture prior (RMP) approach (a well established approach for Bayesian dynamic borrowing of historical controls) to adjust for covariates. The adjustment is done using classical methods from causal inference: inverse probability of treatment weighting, G‐computation and double‐robust estimation. We evaluate these covariate‐adjusted RMP approaches using a comprehensive simulation study and demonstrate their use by performing a retrospective analysis of a prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccine efficacy trial. Adjusting for covariates reduces the drift between current and historical controls, with a beneficial effect on bias, control of type I error and power.
在疫苗疗效临床试验中动态借用历史对照组调整协变量
传统的疫苗疗效试验通常采用固定设计,通常需要大量样本。招募大量受试者会使试验变得昂贵、漫长且难以进行。减少样本量并加快研发速度的一种可行方法是使用历史对照。在本文中,我们扩展了稳健混合先验(RMP)方法(一种成熟的贝叶斯动态借用历史对照的方法),以调整协变量。调整使用的是因果推断的经典方法:逆概率处理加权、G 计算和双稳健估计。我们通过一项综合模拟研究对这些协变量调整后的 RMP 方法进行了评估,并通过对预防性人类乳头瘤病毒疫苗疗效试验进行回顾性分析来展示这些方法的应用。对协变量的调整减少了当前对照和历史对照之间的漂移,对偏差、I 型误差控制和功率都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信