Subsampling of Parametric Models with Bifidelity Boosting

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Nuojin Cheng, Osman Asif Malik, Yiming Xu, Stephen Becker, Alireza Doostan, Akil Narayan
{"title":"Subsampling of Parametric Models with Bifidelity Boosting","authors":"Nuojin Cheng, Osman Asif Malik, Yiming Xu, Stephen Becker, Alireza Doostan, Akil Narayan","doi":"10.1137/22m1524989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 12, Issue 2, Page 213-241, June 2024. <br/>Abstract.Least squares regression is a ubiquitous tool for building emulators (a.k.a. surrogate models) of problems across science and engineering for purposes such as design space exploration and uncertainty quantification. When the regression data are generated using an experimental design process (e.g., a quadrature grid) involving computationally expensive models, or when the data size is large, sketching techniques have shown promise at reducing the cost of the construction of the regression model while ensuring accuracy comparable to that of the full data. However, random sketching strategies, such as those based on leverage scores, lead to regression errors that are random and may exhibit large variability. To mitigate this issue, we present a novel boosting approach that leverages cheaper, lower-fidelity data of the problem at hand to identify the best sketch among a set of candidate sketches. This in turn specifies the sketch of the intended high-fidelity model and the associated data. We provide theoretical analyses of this bifidelity boosting (BFB) approach and discuss the conditions the low- and high-fidelity data must satisfy for a successful boosting. In doing so, we derive a bound on the residual norm of the BFB sketched solution relating it to its ideal, but computationally expensive, high-fidelity boosted counterpart. Empirical results on both manufactured and PDE data corroborate the theoretical analyses and illustrate the efficacy of the BFB solution in reducing the regression error, as compared to the nonboosted solution.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1524989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 12, Issue 2, Page 213-241, June 2024.
Abstract.Least squares regression is a ubiquitous tool for building emulators (a.k.a. surrogate models) of problems across science and engineering for purposes such as design space exploration and uncertainty quantification. When the regression data are generated using an experimental design process (e.g., a quadrature grid) involving computationally expensive models, or when the data size is large, sketching techniques have shown promise at reducing the cost of the construction of the regression model while ensuring accuracy comparable to that of the full data. However, random sketching strategies, such as those based on leverage scores, lead to regression errors that are random and may exhibit large variability. To mitigate this issue, we present a novel boosting approach that leverages cheaper, lower-fidelity data of the problem at hand to identify the best sketch among a set of candidate sketches. This in turn specifies the sketch of the intended high-fidelity model and the associated data. We provide theoretical analyses of this bifidelity boosting (BFB) approach and discuss the conditions the low- and high-fidelity data must satisfy for a successful boosting. In doing so, we derive a bound on the residual norm of the BFB sketched solution relating it to its ideal, but computationally expensive, high-fidelity boosted counterpart. Empirical results on both manufactured and PDE data corroborate the theoretical analyses and illustrate the efficacy of the BFB solution in reducing the regression error, as compared to the nonboosted solution.
利用双保真度提升对参数模型进行子采样
SIAM/ASA 不确定性量化期刊》第 12 卷第 2 期第 213-241 页,2024 年 6 月。摘要.最小二乘回归是一种无处不在的工具,用于建立科学和工程问题的模拟器(又称代用模型),以实现设计空间探索和不确定性量化等目的。当回归数据是通过涉及计算昂贵的模型的实验设计过程(如正交网格)生成时,或者当数据量较大时,草图技术在降低回归模型构建成本的同时,还能确保与完整数据相当的精度。然而,随机草图策略,如基于杠杆分数的草图策略,会导致随机回归误差,并可能表现出很大的变异性。为了缓解这一问题,我们提出了一种新颖的提升方法,该方法利用手头更便宜、保真度更低的问题数据,从一组候选草图中识别出最佳草图。这反过来又指定了预期的高保真模型草图和相关数据。我们对这种双保真度提升(BFB)方法进行了理论分析,并讨论了低保真度数据和高保真数据必须满足哪些条件才能成功提升。在此过程中,我们推导出了 BFB 草图解决方案的残差规范约束,将其与理想的高保真提升对应方案联系起来,但计算成本高昂。对人造数据和 PDE 数据的实证结果证实了理论分析,并说明了 BFB 解决方案在减少回归误差方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信