Clinical risk factors for portal hypertension-related complications in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
{"title":"Clinical risk factors for portal hypertension-related complications in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00535-024-02097-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <span> <h3>Background</h3> <p>During systemic therapy, the management of portal hypertension (PH)-related complications is vital. This study aimed to clarify factors associated with the incidence and exacerbation of PH-related complications, including the usefulness of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the management of PH-related complications during systemic therapy.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Methods</h3> <p>A total of 669 patients who received systemic therapy as first-line treatment (443 patients for sorafenib, 131 for lenvatinib, and 90 for atezolizumab/bevacizumab [ATZ/BEV]) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Additionally, the lower esophageal intramural vessel diameters (EIV) on CECT and endoscopic findings in 358 patients were compared.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Results</h3> <p>The cutoff values of the EIV diameter on CECT were 3.1 mm for small, 5.1 mm for medium, and 7.6 mm for large varices, demonstrating high concordance with the endoscopic findings. esophageal varices (EV) bleeding predictors include EIV ≥ 3.1 mm and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). In patients without EV before systemic therapy, factors associated with EV exacerbation after 3 months were EIV ≥ 1.9 mm and ATZ/BEV use. Predictors of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) include the ammonia level or portosystemic shunt diameter ≥ 6.8 mm. The incidence of HE within 2 weeks was significantly higher (18%) in patients with an ammonia level ≥ 73 μmol/L and a portosystemic shunt ≥ 6.8 mm. The exacerbating factors for ascites after 3 months were PVTT and low albumin levels.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Conclusions</h3> <p>Careful management is warranted for patients with risk factors for exacerbation of PH-related complications; moreover, the effective use of CECT is clinically important.</p> </span>","PeriodicalId":16059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02097-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

During systemic therapy, the management of portal hypertension (PH)-related complications is vital. This study aimed to clarify factors associated with the incidence and exacerbation of PH-related complications, including the usefulness of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the management of PH-related complications during systemic therapy.

Methods

A total of 669 patients who received systemic therapy as first-line treatment (443 patients for sorafenib, 131 for lenvatinib, and 90 for atezolizumab/bevacizumab [ATZ/BEV]) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Additionally, the lower esophageal intramural vessel diameters (EIV) on CECT and endoscopic findings in 358 patients were compared.

Results

The cutoff values of the EIV diameter on CECT were 3.1 mm for small, 5.1 mm for medium, and 7.6 mm for large varices, demonstrating high concordance with the endoscopic findings. esophageal varices (EV) bleeding predictors include EIV ≥ 3.1 mm and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). In patients without EV before systemic therapy, factors associated with EV exacerbation after 3 months were EIV ≥ 1.9 mm and ATZ/BEV use. Predictors of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) include the ammonia level or portosystemic shunt diameter ≥ 6.8 mm. The incidence of HE within 2 weeks was significantly higher (18%) in patients with an ammonia level ≥ 73 μmol/L and a portosystemic shunt ≥ 6.8 mm. The exacerbating factors for ascites after 3 months were PVTT and low albumin levels.

Conclusions

Careful management is warranted for patients with risk factors for exacerbation of PH-related complications; moreover, the effective use of CECT is clinically important.

肝细胞癌全身治疗中出现门静脉高压相关并发症的临床风险因素
摘要 背景 在全身治疗期间,门静脉高压症(PH)相关并发症的处理至关重要。本研究旨在明确与门静脉高压相关并发症的发生率和恶化相关的因素,包括对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)在系统治疗期间门静脉高压相关并发症管理中的作用。 方法 这项回顾性研究共纳入了669名接受一线系统治疗的患者(索拉非尼443名,来伐替尼131名,阿特珠单抗/贝伐单抗[ATZ/BEV]90名)。此外,还比较了 358 例患者的 CECT 和内镜检查结果中食管下段壁内血管直径 (EIV)。 结果 CECT 上 EIV 直径的临界值为:小食管静脉曲张 3.1 mm,中食管静脉曲张 5.1 mm,大食管静脉曲张 7.6 mm,与内镜检查结果高度一致。食管静脉曲张(EV)出血的预测因素包括 EIV ≥ 3.1 mm 和门静脉肿瘤血栓形成(PVTT)。在系统治疗前无EV的患者中,3个月后EV加重的相关因素是EIV≥1.9毫米和使用ATZ/BEV。肝性脑病(HE)的预测因素包括氨水平或门体分流管直径≥6.8毫米。氨水平≥73 μmol/L和门静脉分流直径≥6.8 mm的患者在两周内发生肝性脑病的比例明显更高(18%)。3 个月后腹水加重的因素是 PVTT 和白蛋白水平低。 结论 对于存在 PH 相关并发症加重危险因素的患者,应谨慎管理;此外,有效使用 CECT 在临床上也非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Gastroenterology
Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastroenterology, which is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, publishes Original Articles (Alimentary Tract/Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract), Review Articles, Letters to the Editors and other articles on all aspects of the field of gastroenterology. Significant contributions relating to basic research, theory, and practice are welcomed. These publications are designed to disseminate knowledge in this field to a worldwide audience, and accordingly, its editorial board has an international membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信