RADIOCARBON AGES OF PLANT REMAINS IN MASSIVE GROUND ICE AND UNDERLYING SEDIMENTS OF THE BARROW PERMAFROST TUNNEL, ALASKA

IF 2 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Radiocarbon Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1017/rdc.2024.25
Go Iwahana, Masao Uchida, Kazuho Horiuchi, Jody Deming, Hajo Eicken, Hiroshi Ohno, Kanako Mantoku, Toshiyuki Kobayashi, Kazuyuki Saito
{"title":"RADIOCARBON AGES OF PLANT REMAINS IN MASSIVE GROUND ICE AND UNDERLYING SEDIMENTS OF THE BARROW PERMAFROST TUNNEL, ALASKA","authors":"Go Iwahana, Masao Uchida, Kazuho Horiuchi, Jody Deming, Hajo Eicken, Hiroshi Ohno, Kanako Mantoku, Toshiyuki Kobayashi, Kazuyuki Saito","doi":"10.1017/rdc.2024.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massive ground ice found in the Barrow Permafrost Tunnel at 3–7 m depths from the surface has been interpreted as an ice wedge and used to reconstruct early Holocene environmental changes. To better understand the development of this ground ice, we conducted radiocarbon dating for 34 samples of plant remains from the massive ground ice and underlying sediment layer. A significantly large gap in the measured radiocarbon ages (more than 24 ka) between massive ice and the underlying sediment layer throughout the tunnel profile suggested at least two possibilities. One is that the lower and older sediment layer had thrust upwards at the boundary between intruding ice wedge and adjacent sediment, and the growing ice had pushed the sediment sideways. Another is that erosional events had removed surface materials at about 12–36 ka BP (14–41 cal ka BP) before the overlaying sediment layer with massive ground ice developed. The overall distribution of radiocarbon ages from the massive ice supported the ice-wedge hypothesis as a formation mechanism, although our results showed several age inversions and large fluctuations. Dating of densely spaced samples revealed two ground-ice regions with similar ages around 11–11.5 and 10–10.5 ka BP divided by a relatively narrow region of transitional ages along the tunnel long-axis. This distribution may be explained by a possible misalignment between the sampling direction and the ice-wedge growth line or by intermittent ice growth with repeated cracking at more random locations than the classic ice-wedge growth model suggested.","PeriodicalId":21020,"journal":{"name":"Radiocarbon","volume":"10 22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiocarbon","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rdc.2024.25","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Massive ground ice found in the Barrow Permafrost Tunnel at 3–7 m depths from the surface has been interpreted as an ice wedge and used to reconstruct early Holocene environmental changes. To better understand the development of this ground ice, we conducted radiocarbon dating for 34 samples of plant remains from the massive ground ice and underlying sediment layer. A significantly large gap in the measured radiocarbon ages (more than 24 ka) between massive ice and the underlying sediment layer throughout the tunnel profile suggested at least two possibilities. One is that the lower and older sediment layer had thrust upwards at the boundary between intruding ice wedge and adjacent sediment, and the growing ice had pushed the sediment sideways. Another is that erosional events had removed surface materials at about 12–36 ka BP (14–41 cal ka BP) before the overlaying sediment layer with massive ground ice developed. The overall distribution of radiocarbon ages from the massive ice supported the ice-wedge hypothesis as a formation mechanism, although our results showed several age inversions and large fluctuations. Dating of densely spaced samples revealed two ground-ice regions with similar ages around 11–11.5 and 10–10.5 ka BP divided by a relatively narrow region of transitional ages along the tunnel long-axis. This distribution may be explained by a possible misalignment between the sampling direction and the ice-wedge growth line or by intermittent ice growth with repeated cracking at more random locations than the classic ice-wedge growth model suggested.
阿拉斯加巴罗永久冻土隧道块状地表冰和底层沉积物中植物遗骸的放射性碳年龄
在巴罗永久冻土隧道(Barrow Permafrost Tunnel)距地表 3-7 米深处发现的大量地冰被解释为冰楔,并被用来重建全新世早期的环境变化。为了更好地了解这些地冰的发展过程,我们对大量地冰和底层沉积层中的 34 个植物遗骸样本进行了放射性碳测年。在整个隧道剖面中,大块冰和下层沉积层之间的放射性碳年代测定结果差距很大(超过 24 ka),这至少说明了两种可能性。一种可能是,下层较早的沉积层在侵入的冰楔与相邻沉积层之间的边界向上推移,不断增长的冰将沉积层推向一侧。另一种可能是,大约在公元前 12-36 ka 年(公元前 14-41 cal ka 年),侵蚀事件清除了地表物质,然后才形成了覆盖着大量地表冰的沉积层。块冰的放射性碳年龄的总体分布支持冰缘假说的形成机制,尽管我们的结果显示出一些年龄倒置和较大的波动。对间隔密集的样本进行的年代测定显示,在 11-11.5 ka BP 和 10-10.5 ka BP 附近有两个年代相近的地冰区域,而沿隧道长轴则有一个相对狭窄的年代过渡区域。这种分布的原因可能是取样方向与冰缘生长线之间可能存在错位,或者是冰的间歇性生长,在比经典的冰缘生长模型更随机的位置反复开裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiocarbon
Radiocarbon 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiocarbon serves as the leading international journal for technical and interpretive articles, date lists, and advancements in 14C and other radioisotopes relevant to archaeological, geophysical, oceanographic, and related dating methods. Established in 1959, it has published numerous seminal works and hosts the triennial International Radiocarbon Conference proceedings. The journal also features occasional special issues. Submissions encompass regular articles such as research reports, technical descriptions, and date lists, along with comments, letters to the editor, book reviews, and laboratory lists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信