Screening for Forensically Relevant Drugs Using Data-Independent High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Maia N. Bates, Abby E. Helm and Heather M. Barkholtz*, 
{"title":"Screening for Forensically Relevant Drugs Using Data-Independent High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry","authors":"Maia N. Bates,&nbsp;Abby E. Helm and Heather M. Barkholtz*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Forensic and clinical laboratories are expected to provide a rapid screening of samples for a wide range of analytes; however, the ever-changing landscape of illicit substances makes analysis complicated. There is a great need for untargeted methods that can aid these laboratories in broad-scope drug screening. Liquid chromatography hyphenated with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) has become a popular technique for untargeted screening and presumptive identification of drugs of abuse due to its superior sensitivity and detection capabilities in complex matrices. An untargeted extraction and data acquisition method was evaluated for the broad screening of high-priority drugs of abuse in whole blood. A total of 35 forensically relevant target analytes were identified and extracted at biologically relevant low and high (10× low) concentrations from whole blood using supported liquid extraction. Data-independent acquisition was accomplished using ultraperformance liquid chromatography and a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Results were acceptable for screening assays, with limits of detection at or below the recommended low-concentration cutoffs for most analytes. Analyte ionization varied from 30.1 to 267.6% (average: 110.5%) at low concentrations and from 8.6 to 383.5% (average: 93.6%) at high concentrations. Extraction recovery ranged from 8.5 to 330.5% (average: 105.3%) at low concentrations and from 9.4 to 127.5% (average: 82.7%) at high concentrations. This variability was also captured as precision, ranging from 4.7 to 135.2% (average: 36.5%) at low concentrations and from 0.9 to 59.0% (average: 21.7%) at high concentrations. The method described in this work is efficient and effective for qualitative forensic toxicology screening, as demonstrated by analysis of 166 authentic suspected impaired driver and postmortem specimens. That said, it is critical that laboratories establishing untargeted LC-HRMS screening assays be aware of the strengths and limitations across diverse drug categories and chemical structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":"37 4","pages":"571–579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00379","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forensic and clinical laboratories are expected to provide a rapid screening of samples for a wide range of analytes; however, the ever-changing landscape of illicit substances makes analysis complicated. There is a great need for untargeted methods that can aid these laboratories in broad-scope drug screening. Liquid chromatography hyphenated with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) has become a popular technique for untargeted screening and presumptive identification of drugs of abuse due to its superior sensitivity and detection capabilities in complex matrices. An untargeted extraction and data acquisition method was evaluated for the broad screening of high-priority drugs of abuse in whole blood. A total of 35 forensically relevant target analytes were identified and extracted at biologically relevant low and high (10× low) concentrations from whole blood using supported liquid extraction. Data-independent acquisition was accomplished using ultraperformance liquid chromatography and a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Results were acceptable for screening assays, with limits of detection at or below the recommended low-concentration cutoffs for most analytes. Analyte ionization varied from 30.1 to 267.6% (average: 110.5%) at low concentrations and from 8.6 to 383.5% (average: 93.6%) at high concentrations. Extraction recovery ranged from 8.5 to 330.5% (average: 105.3%) at low concentrations and from 9.4 to 127.5% (average: 82.7%) at high concentrations. This variability was also captured as precision, ranging from 4.7 to 135.2% (average: 36.5%) at low concentrations and from 0.9 to 59.0% (average: 21.7%) at high concentrations. The method described in this work is efficient and effective for qualitative forensic toxicology screening, as demonstrated by analysis of 166 authentic suspected impaired driver and postmortem specimens. That said, it is critical that laboratories establishing untargeted LC-HRMS screening assays be aware of the strengths and limitations across diverse drug categories and chemical structures.

Abstract Image

利用独立于数据的高分辨率质谱技术筛查法医相关药物
法医和临床实验室需要对样本中的各种分析物进行快速筛查;然而,非法物质的不断变化使得分析变得复杂。因此亟需能帮助这些实验室进行大范围药物筛查的非靶向方法。液相色谱与高分辨质谱联用(LC-HRMS)因其在复杂基质中卓越的灵敏度和检测能力,已成为非靶向筛选和推定识别滥用药物的常用技术。为广泛筛查全血中的高优先级滥用药物,对一种非靶向提取和数据采集方法进行了评估。采用支持液体萃取法从全血中鉴定并萃取了 35 种与法医学相关的目标分析物,浓度分别为生物相关的低浓度和高浓度(10 倍低浓度)。使用超高效液相色谱法和四极杆飞行时间质谱法完成了数据独立采集。结果可用于筛选检测,大多数分析物的检测限均达到或低于建议的低浓度临界值。低浓度时,被分析物的电离率从 30.1% 到 267.6%(平均:110.5%)不等;高浓度时,电离率从 8.6% 到 383.5%(平均:93.6%)不等。萃取回收率在低浓度时为 8.5%至 330.5%(平均:105.3%),在高浓度时为 9.4%至 127.5%(平均:82.7%)。这种可变性也体现在精确度上,低浓度为 4.7%至 135.2%(平均:36.5%),高浓度为 0.9%至 59.0%(平均:21.7%)。通过对 166 份真实的疑似受损驾驶员和死后标本的分析,证明了本研究中描述的方法在法医毒理学定性筛选方面的高效性和有效性。尽管如此,实验室在建立非靶向 LC-HRMS 筛选测定法时必须了解不同药物类别和化学结构的优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信