Great expectations, not-so-great performance: Participant views of community-based natural resource management in Ghana, West Africa

IF 3.7 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andrew Kyei Agyare , Lars Haubye Holbech , Nico Arcilla
{"title":"Great expectations, not-so-great performance: Participant views of community-based natural resource management in Ghana, West Africa","authors":"Andrew Kyei Agyare ,&nbsp;Lars Haubye Holbech ,&nbsp;Nico Arcilla","doi":"10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature conservation and sustainable development goals are challenged by powerful economic incentives to exploit natural resources, particularly in many tropical countries. Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects have been encouraged worldwide for over 40 years to improve the sustainability of nature-based livelihoods and facilitate natural resource governance in accordance with cultural and spiritual traditions. CBNRM has been implemented in Ghana, West Africa, for over 20 years in the form of Community Resource Management Areas (CREMAs), but their success in supporting conservation and sustainable development goals remains the subject of debate. We evaluated participant views of 33 conservation, economic, and sociocultural outcomes through 881 interviews with people from 89 communities associated with eight CREMAs. Participants reported highest expectations and performance for outcomes including conservation awareness, increased food and honey production, and collective community action and unity. However, perceived performance failed to meet participant expectations for all 33 outcomes and particularly for conservation and economic outcomes. Expectation-performance gaps were largest for conservation outcomes such as reduced illegal logging, economic outcomes including increased income, financial assistance, and employment, and sociocultural outcomes such as the constancy of children's school attendance. Successfully addressing these gaps will depend largely on external factors, such as government effectiveness in controlling illegal logging and investments in credit and education. While this and other CBNRM approaches cannot stand alone to achieve conservation goals, with sufficient external support they can provide substantial benefits to participants and play a supporting role in conservation and as buffers to successful protected areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34472,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100251"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049024000112/pdfft?md5=c9561572f16e55f76ad34326af13658e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666049024000112-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049024000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature conservation and sustainable development goals are challenged by powerful economic incentives to exploit natural resources, particularly in many tropical countries. Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects have been encouraged worldwide for over 40 years to improve the sustainability of nature-based livelihoods and facilitate natural resource governance in accordance with cultural and spiritual traditions. CBNRM has been implemented in Ghana, West Africa, for over 20 years in the form of Community Resource Management Areas (CREMAs), but their success in supporting conservation and sustainable development goals remains the subject of debate. We evaluated participant views of 33 conservation, economic, and sociocultural outcomes through 881 interviews with people from 89 communities associated with eight CREMAs. Participants reported highest expectations and performance for outcomes including conservation awareness, increased food and honey production, and collective community action and unity. However, perceived performance failed to meet participant expectations for all 33 outcomes and particularly for conservation and economic outcomes. Expectation-performance gaps were largest for conservation outcomes such as reduced illegal logging, economic outcomes including increased income, financial assistance, and employment, and sociocultural outcomes such as the constancy of children's school attendance. Successfully addressing these gaps will depend largely on external factors, such as government effectiveness in controlling illegal logging and investments in credit and education. While this and other CBNRM approaches cannot stand alone to achieve conservation goals, with sufficient external support they can provide substantial benefits to participants and play a supporting role in conservation and as buffers to successful protected areas.

美好的期望,不尽人意的表现:参与者对西非加纳社区自然资源管理的看法
自然保护和可持续发展目标受到开采自然资源的强大经济激励的挑战,尤其是在许多热带国家。40 多年来,全世界一直鼓励开展以社区为基础的自然资源管理(CBNRM)项目,以改善以自然为基础的生计的可持续性,并根据文化和精神传统促进自然资源治理。在西非的加纳,以社区资源管理区(CREMAs)的形式实施 CBNRM 已有 20 多年的历史,但其在支持保护和可持续发展目标方面的成功与否仍是争论的焦点。我们对与八个社区资源管理区相关的 89 个社区的居民进行了 881 次访谈,评估了参与者对 33 项保护、经济和社会文化成果的看法。参与者对保护意识、粮食和蜂蜜产量的提高以及社区集体行动和团结等成果的期望和绩效都达到了最高水平。然而,在所有 33 项成果中,尤其是在保护和经济成果方面,参与者认为的绩效没有达到预期。预期绩效差距最大的是保护成果,如减少非法采伐;经济成果,包括增加收入、财政援助和就业;以及社会文化成果,如儿童入学率的稳定性。成功缩小这些差距在很大程度上取决于外部因素,如政府在控制非法砍伐方面的有效性以及在信贷和教育方面的投资。虽然这种方法和其他 CBNRM 方法不能单独实现保护目标,但如果有足够的外部支持,它们可以为参与者带来巨大的利益,并在保护中发挥辅助作用,成为成功保护区的缓冲区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
95 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信