The impact of changing the reference countries on the list prices for patented medicines in Canada: A policy analysis

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Wei Zhang , Daphne P. Guh , Paul Grootendorst , Aidan Hollis , Aslam H. Anis
{"title":"The impact of changing the reference countries on the list prices for patented medicines in Canada: A policy analysis","authors":"Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Daphne P. Guh ,&nbsp;Paul Grootendorst ,&nbsp;Aidan Hollis ,&nbsp;Aslam H. Anis","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Background: Canada's Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) uses external and internal reference pricing (IRP) to regulate patented drug list prices. PMPRB has changed external reference countries from 7 to 11 to include countries with prices closer to the OECD median. We examined the impact on the list prices for patented medicines had the amendment been implemented from 2013.</p><p>Methods: Using IQVIA MIDAS® quarterly sales data, we selected branded products that were launched in Canada in 2013–2018. The list price for each product in each country was calculated as its average annual price during the 3rd year post Canadian launch. The median international price (MIP) was the median of the list prices of PMPRB7 (MIP7) and PMPRB11 (MIP11). We assumed the same IRP would be (scenario 1) or would not be used (scenario 2).</p><p>Results: Among the selected 400 products, 80.3 % (321) had MIP7 and MIP11 (launched in at least one reference country); 18.3 % did not have MIP11. The total current expenditures were $7,134.4 M. In scenario 1, MIP11 would not be binding for most products and expenditures would decline only by 0.7 %. If IRP were abolished, expenditures might decline by 14.1 % if the launching sequence would not change.</p><p>Conclusions: MIP11 might not be binding for most medicines. The impact depends on whether to retain the IRP and approaches taken for medicines without MIP11.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 105064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024000745/pdfft?md5=1e36c207821807721c891654e825048f&pid=1-s2.0-S0168851024000745-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024000745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Canada's Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) uses external and internal reference pricing (IRP) to regulate patented drug list prices. PMPRB has changed external reference countries from 7 to 11 to include countries with prices closer to the OECD median. We examined the impact on the list prices for patented medicines had the amendment been implemented from 2013.

Methods: Using IQVIA MIDAS® quarterly sales data, we selected branded products that were launched in Canada in 2013–2018. The list price for each product in each country was calculated as its average annual price during the 3rd year post Canadian launch. The median international price (MIP) was the median of the list prices of PMPRB7 (MIP7) and PMPRB11 (MIP11). We assumed the same IRP would be (scenario 1) or would not be used (scenario 2).

Results: Among the selected 400 products, 80.3 % (321) had MIP7 and MIP11 (launched in at least one reference country); 18.3 % did not have MIP11. The total current expenditures were $7,134.4 M. In scenario 1, MIP11 would not be binding for most products and expenditures would decline only by 0.7 %. If IRP were abolished, expenditures might decline by 14.1 % if the launching sequence would not change.

Conclusions: MIP11 might not be binding for most medicines. The impact depends on whether to retain the IRP and approaches taken for medicines without MIP11.

改变参照国对加拿大专利药品清单价格的影响:政策分析
背景:加拿大专利药品价格审查委员会(PMPRB)使用外部和内部参考定价(IRP)来监管专利药品的上市价格。PMPRB 已将外部参考定价国家从 7 个增至 11 个,以纳入价格更接近经合组织中位数的国家。我们研究了自 2013 年起实施该修正案对专利药品上市价格的影响:利用 IQVIA MIDAS® 季度销售数据,我们选择了 2013-2018 年在加拿大上市的品牌产品。每个产品在每个国家的上市价格按其在加拿大上市后第三年的年均价格计算。国际价格中位数 (MIP) 是 PMPRB7 (MIP7) 和 PMPRB11 (MIP11) 上市价格的中位数。我们假设将使用(方案 1)或不使用(方案 2)相同的 IRP:在选定的 400 种产品中,80.3%(321 种)拥有 MIP7 和 MIP11(至少在一个参照国推出);18.3% 没有 MIP11。在情景 1 中,MIP11 对大多数产品没有约束力,支出仅下降 0.7%。如果取消 IRP,在发射顺序不变的情况下,支出可能会下降 14.1%:MIP11 可能对大多数药品没有约束力。其影响取决于是否保留 IRP 以及在没有 MIP11 的情况下对药品采取的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信