Local field potential journey into the Basal Ganglia

Eitan E. Asher , Maya Slovik , Rea Mitelman , Hagai Bergman , Shlomo Havlin , Shay Moshel
{"title":"Local field potential journey into the Basal Ganglia","authors":"Eitan E. Asher ,&nbsp;Maya Slovik ,&nbsp;Rea Mitelman ,&nbsp;Hagai Bergman ,&nbsp;Shlomo Havlin ,&nbsp;Shay Moshel","doi":"10.1016/j.jdbs.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Local field potentials (LFP) in the basal ganglia (BG) have attracted considerable research and clinical interest. The genesis of these signals has been a topic of extensive discourse, focusing on whether they are a manifestation of local synaptic activity or result from the propagation of electrical signals through tissue, as described by the Maxwell equations (volume conduction). To investigate this, we conducted simultaneous recordings of LFPs from two cortical areas— the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the primary motor cortex (M1)—and various sites within the BG nuclei in an awake, non-task-engaged non-human primate (NHP). Employing innovative analytical techniques, we discerned significant cross-correlations indicative of potential connections, while filtering out non-significant correlations. This allowed us to differentiate between synaptic inputs and volume conduction. Our findings indicate two distinct propagation pathways of BG field potentials emanating from the M1 and the DLPFC, each characterized by different temporal delays. The results imply that these anatomical pathways are differentially influenced by the mechanisms of volume conduction and synaptic transmission. Notably, the M1 exhibits more functional links with non-zero-time delays to the BG structures, while the DLPFC-BG connections are marked by zero-time delays, suggesting a predominance of volume conduction effects. Consequently, investigations into the origins of BG LFP should account for the distinct anatomical pathways linking the cortex and the BG, as they differentially represent information flow and volume conductance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100359,"journal":{"name":"Deep Brain Stimulation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 20-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949669124000046/pdfft?md5=0860751b57ed52a679b69d6665e7eba4&pid=1-s2.0-S2949669124000046-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deep Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949669124000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local field potentials (LFP) in the basal ganglia (BG) have attracted considerable research and clinical interest. The genesis of these signals has been a topic of extensive discourse, focusing on whether they are a manifestation of local synaptic activity or result from the propagation of electrical signals through tissue, as described by the Maxwell equations (volume conduction). To investigate this, we conducted simultaneous recordings of LFPs from two cortical areas— the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the primary motor cortex (M1)—and various sites within the BG nuclei in an awake, non-task-engaged non-human primate (NHP). Employing innovative analytical techniques, we discerned significant cross-correlations indicative of potential connections, while filtering out non-significant correlations. This allowed us to differentiate between synaptic inputs and volume conduction. Our findings indicate two distinct propagation pathways of BG field potentials emanating from the M1 and the DLPFC, each characterized by different temporal delays. The results imply that these anatomical pathways are differentially influenced by the mechanisms of volume conduction and synaptic transmission. Notably, the M1 exhibits more functional links with non-zero-time delays to the BG structures, while the DLPFC-BG connections are marked by zero-time delays, suggesting a predominance of volume conduction effects. Consequently, investigations into the origins of BG LFP should account for the distinct anatomical pathways linking the cortex and the BG, as they differentially represent information flow and volume conductance.

进入基底神经节的局部场电位之旅
基底神经节(BG)的局部场电位(LFP)引起了相当多的研究和临床兴趣。这些信号的成因一直是人们广泛讨论的话题,重点在于它们是局部突触活动的表现,还是麦克斯韦方程(体积传导)所描述的电信号在组织中传播的结果。为了探究这个问题,我们在一只清醒的非人灵长类动物(NHP)身上同时记录了两个皮层区域(背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)和初级运动皮层(M1))以及 BG 核内不同部位的 LFPs。利用创新的分析技术,我们发现了表明潜在联系的重要交叉相关性,同时过滤掉了不重要的相关性。这使我们能够区分突触输入和体积传导。我们的研究结果表明,来自 M1 和 DLPFC 的 BG 场电位有两种不同的传播途径,各自具有不同的时间延迟。这些结果表明,这些解剖路径受到体积传导和突触传递机制的不同影响。值得注意的是,M1与BG结构的非零时间延迟功能联系较多,而DLPFC与BG的联系则以零时间延迟为特征,这表明体积传导效应占主导地位。因此,在研究 BG LFP 的起源时,应考虑到连接大脑皮层和 BG 的不同解剖通路,因为它们在信息流和体积传导方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信