Variable selection and inference strategies for multiple compositional regression

IF 3.7 2区 化学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Sujin Lee, Sungkyu Jung
{"title":"Variable selection and inference strategies for multiple compositional regression","authors":"Sujin Lee,&nbsp;Sungkyu Jung","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An important problem in compositional data analysis is variable selection in linear regression models with compositional covariates. In the context of microbiome data analysis, there is a demand for considering grouping information such as structures among taxa and multiple sampling sites, resulting in multiple compositional covariates. We develop and compare two different methods of variable selection and inference strategies, based on the debiased lasso and a resampling-based approach. Confidence intervals for individual regression coefficients, obtained from each of the two methods, are shown to be asymptotically valid even in a high-dimension, low-sample-size regime. However, microbiome data often have extremely small sample sizes, rendering asymptotic results unreliable. Through extensive numerical comparisons of the finite-sample performances of the two methods, we find that resampling-based approaches outperform the debiased compositional lasso in cases of extremely small sample sizes, showing higher positive predictive values. Conversely, for larger sample sizes, debiasing yields better results. We apply the proposed multiple compositional regression to steer microbiome data, identifying key bacterial taxa associated with important cattle quality measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9774,"journal":{"name":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743924000613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important problem in compositional data analysis is variable selection in linear regression models with compositional covariates. In the context of microbiome data analysis, there is a demand for considering grouping information such as structures among taxa and multiple sampling sites, resulting in multiple compositional covariates. We develop and compare two different methods of variable selection and inference strategies, based on the debiased lasso and a resampling-based approach. Confidence intervals for individual regression coefficients, obtained from each of the two methods, are shown to be asymptotically valid even in a high-dimension, low-sample-size regime. However, microbiome data often have extremely small sample sizes, rendering asymptotic results unreliable. Through extensive numerical comparisons of the finite-sample performances of the two methods, we find that resampling-based approaches outperform the debiased compositional lasso in cases of extremely small sample sizes, showing higher positive predictive values. Conversely, for larger sample sizes, debiasing yields better results. We apply the proposed multiple compositional regression to steer microbiome data, identifying key bacterial taxa associated with important cattle quality measures.

多元组合回归的变量选择和推理策略
成分数据分析中的一个重要问题是带有成分协变量的线性回归模型中的变量选择。在微生物组数据分析中,需要考虑分类群之间的结构和多个采样点等分组信息,从而产生多个组成协变量。我们开发并比较了两种不同的变量选择方法和推断策略,分别基于去偏套索和基于重采样的方法。结果表明,即使在高维度、低样本量的情况下,通过这两种方法获得的单个回归系数的置信区间也是渐进有效的。然而,微生物组数据的样本量往往极小,使得渐近结果不可靠。通过对这两种方法的有限样本性能进行广泛的数值比较,我们发现在样本量极小的情况下,基于重采样的方法优于去偏组成套索,显示出更高的正预测值。相反,在样本量较大的情况下,去重抽样则能获得更好的结果。我们将所提出的多重成分回归方法应用于转向架微生物组数据,确定了与重要的牛群质量指标相关的关键细菌类群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
169
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems publishes original research papers, short communications, reviews, tutorials and Original Software Publications reporting on development of novel statistical, mathematical, or computer techniques in Chemistry and related disciplines. Chemometrics is the chemical discipline that uses mathematical and statistical methods to design or select optimal procedures and experiments, and to provide maximum chemical information by analysing chemical data. The journal deals with the following topics: 1) Development of new statistical, mathematical and chemometrical methods for Chemistry and related fields (Environmental Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology, System Biology, -Omics, etc.) 2) Novel applications of chemometrics to all branches of Chemistry and related fields (typical domains of interest are: process data analysis, experimental design, data mining, signal processing, supervised modelling, decision making, robust statistics, mixture analysis, multivariate calibration etc.) Routine applications of established chemometrical techniques will not be considered. 3) Development of new software that provides novel tools or truly advances the use of chemometrical methods. 4) Well characterized data sets to test performance for the new methods and software. The journal complies with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors'' Uniform requirements for manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信