From acquisitive to conservative: The ontogenetic trajectory of root syndrome of annual and perennial co-generic species

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
L. Gonzalez-Paleo , C. Parmigiani , A. Pastor-Pastor , A.E. Vilela
{"title":"From acquisitive to conservative: The ontogenetic trajectory of root syndrome of annual and perennial co-generic species","authors":"L. Gonzalez-Paleo ,&nbsp;C. Parmigiani ,&nbsp;A. Pastor-Pastor ,&nbsp;A.E. Vilela","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2024.103996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Perennials has been proposed as new crops because their root syndrome offers more ecosystem services and a better use of resources than the annual one. Objective: To compare the ontogenetic trajectory of root syndromes of annual (<em>P. gracilis and P. angustifolia) and perennial (P. pinetorum and P. mendocina) species of Physaria (Brassicaceae) and their root trait relationships.</em></p></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusion</h3><p>Roots became conservative as plants grew, independently of the life cycle of the species. However, perennials invested initially more resources in increasing storage capacity (bigger and thicker roots) while annuals favored increasing the exploration capacity (higher SRL). During first anthesis we found tradeoffs between acquisitive and conservative traits, as expected according to the Root Economic Spectrum (RES), but after the first year, those tradeoffs disappeared and perennials were able to combine a thick and deep taproot and high investment in C reserves with some well-developed acquisitive traits such as higher SRL and total length. This suggest that root traits should be selected during the second year, when no tradeoff exist. Differences between annuals and perennials in most structural taproot traits remained constant along the ontogenetic trajectory, thus the relative position of species in the RES did not change over time. We found a gradient of root strategies supported by the RES theory: from acquisitive in the annual P. gracilis (high SRL, STD and total length) to conservative in the perennial <em>P. mendocina (high root biomass, root diameter, tissue density and storage) with intermediate strategies in P. angustifolia and P. pinetorum.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55564,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103996"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X24000183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perennials has been proposed as new crops because their root syndrome offers more ecosystem services and a better use of resources than the annual one. Objective: To compare the ontogenetic trajectory of root syndromes of annual (P. gracilis and P. angustifolia) and perennial (P. pinetorum and P. mendocina) species of Physaria (Brassicaceae) and their root trait relationships.

Results and Conclusion

Roots became conservative as plants grew, independently of the life cycle of the species. However, perennials invested initially more resources in increasing storage capacity (bigger and thicker roots) while annuals favored increasing the exploration capacity (higher SRL). During first anthesis we found tradeoffs between acquisitive and conservative traits, as expected according to the Root Economic Spectrum (RES), but after the first year, those tradeoffs disappeared and perennials were able to combine a thick and deep taproot and high investment in C reserves with some well-developed acquisitive traits such as higher SRL and total length. This suggest that root traits should be selected during the second year, when no tradeoff exist. Differences between annuals and perennials in most structural taproot traits remained constant along the ontogenetic trajectory, thus the relative position of species in the RES did not change over time. We found a gradient of root strategies supported by the RES theory: from acquisitive in the annual P. gracilis (high SRL, STD and total length) to conservative in the perennial P. mendocina (high root biomass, root diameter, tissue density and storage) with intermediate strategies in P. angustifolia and P. pinetorum.

从获取型到保守型:一年生和多年生同属物种根系综合征的本体发育轨迹
人们建议将多年生植物作为新作物,因为与一年生植物相比,多年生植物的根系综合征可提供更多的生态系统服务,并能更好地利用资源。研究目的比较 Physaria(十字花科)一年生(P. gracilis 和 P. angustifolia)和多年生(P. pinetorum 和 P. mendocina)物种根系综合征的发育轨迹及其根系性状关系。然而,多年生植物最初将更多资源投入到增加储存能力上(根更大更粗),而一年生植物则倾向于增加探索能力(更高的SRL)。根据根经济光谱(RES)的预期,我们发现在初花期,获取性状和保守性状之间存在权衡,但在第一年后,这些权衡消失了,多年生植物能够将粗而深的直根和对碳储备的高投入与一些发达的获取性状(如更高的SRL和总长度)结合起来。这表明,根系性状应在第二年进行选择,因为此时不存在折衷。一年生植物和多年生植物在大多数结构直根性状上的差异在个体发育过程中保持不变,因此物种在RES中的相对位置并没有随着时间的推移而改变。我们发现根策略的梯度得到了 RES 理论的支持:从一年生 P. gracilis 的获取策略(高 SRL、STD 和总长度)到多年生 P. mendocina 的保守策略(高根生物量、根直径、组织密度和储存量),以及 P. angustifolia 和 P. pinetorum 的中间策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
>0 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oecologica is venue for the publication of original research articles in ecology. We encourage studies in all areas of ecology, including ecosystem ecology, community ecology, population ecology, conservation ecology and evolutionary ecology. There is no bias with respect to taxon, biome or geographic area. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome, but combinations are particularly sought. Priority is given to papers based on explicitly stated hypotheses. Acta Oecologica also accepts review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信