On TinyML WiFi Fingerprinting-Based Indoor Localization: Comparing RSSI vs. CSI Utilization

Diego Mendez, Marco Zennaro, Moez Altayeb, Pietro Manzoni
{"title":"On TinyML WiFi Fingerprinting-Based Indoor Localization: Comparing RSSI vs. CSI Utilization","authors":"Diego Mendez, Marco Zennaro, Moez Altayeb, Pietro Manzoni","doi":"10.1109/CCNC51664.2024.10454828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As context-aware location-based services (LBS) become increasingly important in many Internet of Things (IoT) verticals, such as logistics or industry 4.0, indoor localization is now an essential feature to be integrated in these solutions. For this purpose, fingerprinting-based solutions arise as a feasible solution, especially when integrating artificial intelligence on the edge, supported by computational and memory-restricted embedded devices, as it does not depend on a cloud-based deployment. In this work, we integrate this new paradigm, known as TinyML, and compare the implementation of a machine learning (ML) model when using only WiFi Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) or WiFi Channel State Information (CSI) data. We tested two different scenarios, a single sample or time series, with different configurations of the trained neural network. Our results show that a CSI data ML model always outperforms an equivalent RSSI approach, with a massive difference in performance for the time-series case.","PeriodicalId":518411,"journal":{"name":"2024 IEEE 21st Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)","volume":"64 8","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2024 IEEE 21st Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC51664.2024.10454828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As context-aware location-based services (LBS) become increasingly important in many Internet of Things (IoT) verticals, such as logistics or industry 4.0, indoor localization is now an essential feature to be integrated in these solutions. For this purpose, fingerprinting-based solutions arise as a feasible solution, especially when integrating artificial intelligence on the edge, supported by computational and memory-restricted embedded devices, as it does not depend on a cloud-based deployment. In this work, we integrate this new paradigm, known as TinyML, and compare the implementation of a machine learning (ML) model when using only WiFi Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) or WiFi Channel State Information (CSI) data. We tested two different scenarios, a single sample or time series, with different configurations of the trained neural network. Our results show that a CSI data ML model always outperforms an equivalent RSSI approach, with a massive difference in performance for the time-series case.
基于 TinyML WiFi 指纹的室内定位:比较 RSSI 与 CSI 利用率
随着基于情境感知的定位服务(LBS)在物流或工业 4.0 等许多物联网(IoT)垂直领域变得越来越重要,室内定位现在已成为集成到这些解决方案中的一项基本功能。为此,基于指纹识别的解决方案成为一种可行的解决方案,尤其是在边缘集成人工智能时,由计算和内存受限的嵌入式设备提供支持,因为它不依赖于基于云的部署。在这项工作中,我们整合了这种被称为 TinyML 的新范例,并比较了仅使用 WiFi 接收信号强度指示器(RSSI)或 WiFi 信道状态信息(CSI)数据时机器学习(ML)模型的实施情况。我们测试了两种不同的情况:单一样本或时间序列,以及训练有素的神经网络的不同配置。我们的结果表明,CSI 数据 ML 模型的性能始终优于同等的 RSSI 方法,而在时间序列情况下,两者的性能差异巨大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信