Analysis of the endocardial stage of treatment of tachyarhythmias after open interventions for atrial fibrillation. Experience of one center

A. S. Postol, G. N. Antipov, A. V. Ivanchenko, Vitaliy V. Lyashenko, D. A. Kalinin, S. Kotov, A. B. Vygovsky, Yuriy A. Shneider
{"title":"Analysis of the endocardial stage of treatment of tachyarhythmias after open interventions for atrial fibrillation. Experience of one center","authors":"A. S. Postol, G. N. Antipov, A. V. Ivanchenko, Vitaliy V. Lyashenko, D. A. Kalinin, S. Kotov, A. B. Vygovsky, Yuriy A. Shneider","doi":"10.17816/cardar529671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: To study EFI parameters and features of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients who underwent surgical correction of AF. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: from January 2013 to December 2021, 447 combined interventions were performed to eliminate AF using the labyrinth-3 and left atrial labyrinth techniques with correction of CHD (congenital heart disease) and/or coronary artery disease. \nRhythm disturbances were detected in 57 (12.7%) patients at various follow-up periods. Endovascular interventions were performed in 39 patients. The average follow-up period after the endocardial stage was 34.37 (standard deviation 24.32) months. The median age of patients was 64 (58–67) years, 21 (54%) were men. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 — after the classic biatrial (BA) labyrinth-3 — 23 (59%) patients, group 2 — after the left-atrial variant (LA) labyrinth-3 — 16 (41%) patients. \nAt the endocardial stage, electrophysiological studies (EFI) were performed to clarify the mechanism of arrhythmia, and ablation eliminated tachyarrhythmia. EFI protocol: revision of the pulmonary veins, determination of the isolation of the posterior wall of the LA assessment of atrial arrhythmia, elimination of arrhythmia, control induction of arrhythmia after ablation. After repeated intervention, patients were observed in the operating clinic every 3 months. \nRESULTS: After the endocardial stage, a regular rhythm was determined in 19 (82.6%) patients of the BA group, 13 (92.9%) patients of the LA group (p = 0.914). Relapses in the form of AF were noted in 5 patients (4 — group 1 and 1 — group 2) group (p = 0.306) All relapses of tachyarrhythmia with an irregular cycle (AF) were detected in patients with AF before the endovascular stage In both groups, there were cases of restoration of conduction in the pulmonary veins — 10 (43.5%) patients after BA ablation and 1 (5.3%) patient after LA ablation. There are no recurrences of atrial arrhythmia after ablation of atrial flutter (arrhythmia with a stable cycle). \nCONCLUSION: The endocardial stage is highly effective and demonstrates subsequent freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients who have tachycardia with a regular cycle after both methods of surgical ablation of AF. Recurrent tachyarrhythmia in the form of AF (irregular cycle) is associated with a low probability of maintaining a regular atrial rhythm after a repeated endocardial procedure, due to the presence of structural and electrophysiological changes in the atrial myocardium.","PeriodicalId":518674,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac Arrhythmias","volume":"11 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac Arrhythmias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/cardar529671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM: To study EFI parameters and features of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients who underwent surgical correction of AF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: from January 2013 to December 2021, 447 combined interventions were performed to eliminate AF using the labyrinth-3 and left atrial labyrinth techniques with correction of CHD (congenital heart disease) and/or coronary artery disease. Rhythm disturbances were detected in 57 (12.7%) patients at various follow-up periods. Endovascular interventions were performed in 39 patients. The average follow-up period after the endocardial stage was 34.37 (standard deviation 24.32) months. The median age of patients was 64 (58–67) years, 21 (54%) were men. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 — after the classic biatrial (BA) labyrinth-3 — 23 (59%) patients, group 2 — after the left-atrial variant (LA) labyrinth-3 — 16 (41%) patients. At the endocardial stage, electrophysiological studies (EFI) were performed to clarify the mechanism of arrhythmia, and ablation eliminated tachyarrhythmia. EFI protocol: revision of the pulmonary veins, determination of the isolation of the posterior wall of the LA assessment of atrial arrhythmia, elimination of arrhythmia, control induction of arrhythmia after ablation. After repeated intervention, patients were observed in the operating clinic every 3 months. RESULTS: After the endocardial stage, a regular rhythm was determined in 19 (82.6%) patients of the BA group, 13 (92.9%) patients of the LA group (p = 0.914). Relapses in the form of AF were noted in 5 patients (4 — group 1 and 1 — group 2) group (p = 0.306) All relapses of tachyarrhythmia with an irregular cycle (AF) were detected in patients with AF before the endovascular stage In both groups, there were cases of restoration of conduction in the pulmonary veins — 10 (43.5%) patients after BA ablation and 1 (5.3%) patient after LA ablation. There are no recurrences of atrial arrhythmia after ablation of atrial flutter (arrhythmia with a stable cycle). CONCLUSION: The endocardial stage is highly effective and demonstrates subsequent freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients who have tachycardia with a regular cycle after both methods of surgical ablation of AF. Recurrent tachyarrhythmia in the form of AF (irregular cycle) is associated with a low probability of maintaining a regular atrial rhythm after a repeated endocardial procedure, due to the presence of structural and electrophysiological changes in the atrial myocardium.
分析心房颤动开放介入治疗后快速性心律失常的心内膜治疗阶段。一个中心的经验
目的:研究接受房颤手术矫正的患者的 EFI 参数和复发性房性快速性心律失常的特征。材料和方法:2013 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月,447 例患者在接受了 CHD(先天性心脏病)和/或冠状动脉疾病矫治的同时,接受了迷宫-3 和左心房迷宫技术的联合介入治疗,以消除房颤。在不同的随访期间,有 57 名患者(12.7%)被检测出心律失常。39名患者接受了血管内介入治疗。心内膜阶段后的平均随访时间为 34.37 个月(标准差为 24.32 个月)。患者的中位年龄为 64(58-67)岁,21(54%)人为男性。患者被分为两组:第1组--经典双心房(BA)迷宫-3术后--23名(59%)患者,第2组--左心房变异(LA)迷宫-3术后--16名(41%)患者。在心内膜阶段,进行了电生理学研究(EFI)以明确心律失常的机制,消融术消除了快速性心律失常。EFI 方案:修改肺静脉,确定 LA 后壁隔离评估房性心律失常,消除心律失常,控制消融后诱发心律失常。反复干预后,每 3 个月在手术室对患者进行观察。结果:心内膜阶段后,BA 组有 19 名(82.6%)患者的心律正常,LA 组有 13 名(92.9%)患者的心律正常(P = 0.914)。在两组患者中,均有肺静脉传导恢复的病例--BA消融术后有10例(43.5%)患者,LA消融术后有1例(5.3%)患者。心房扑动(周期稳定的心律失常)消融术后,心房心律失常没有复发。结论:心内膜阶段效果显著,两种房颤手术消融方法均可使周期规律的心动过速患者随后不再出现房性心律失常。房颤(周期不规则)形式的复发性快速心律失常与重复心内膜手术后维持规律心房节律的可能性较低有关,这是因为心房心肌存在结构和电生理变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信