Estimating Multi-Phase Life Cycle Reliability by Combining Failure Rate Adjustments into Duty Cycle

Miklós Á. Szidarovszky
{"title":"Estimating Multi-Phase Life Cycle Reliability by Combining Failure Rate Adjustments into Duty Cycle","authors":"Miklós Á. Szidarovszky","doi":"10.1109/RAMS51492.2024.10457642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, calculating the life cycle reliability of a system across multiple phases would be obtained by calculating the reliability of the components and the system in each phase independently, and then combining those individual phase reliabilities into an overall life cycle reliability. This paper showcases the usage of the duty cycle to combine all failure rate adjustments, e.g. environments, dormancy etc., and life cycle phases to remove the need to calculate individual failure rates for components and simplify the Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) for the system. This methodology allows an analytical reliability approach on a multi-phased life cycle using an analytical RBD as opposed to a phase-based simulation RBD. A comparison of the results between the methodologies, for a system that has a multi-phase life cycle, confirms that combining multiple factors into the duty cycle(s) allows for the use of an analytical RBD as an alternate to a phase-based simulation RBD, with the limitation that the failure rate is constant in each phase of the life cycle.","PeriodicalId":518362,"journal":{"name":"2024 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"12 7","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2024 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS51492.2024.10457642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, calculating the life cycle reliability of a system across multiple phases would be obtained by calculating the reliability of the components and the system in each phase independently, and then combining those individual phase reliabilities into an overall life cycle reliability. This paper showcases the usage of the duty cycle to combine all failure rate adjustments, e.g. environments, dormancy etc., and life cycle phases to remove the need to calculate individual failure rates for components and simplify the Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) for the system. This methodology allows an analytical reliability approach on a multi-phased life cycle using an analytical RBD as opposed to a phase-based simulation RBD. A comparison of the results between the methodologies, for a system that has a multi-phase life cycle, confirms that combining multiple factors into the duty cycle(s) allows for the use of an analytical RBD as an alternate to a phase-based simulation RBD, with the limitation that the failure rate is constant in each phase of the life cycle.
将故障率调整与占空比相结合,估算多阶段生命周期可靠性
传统上,计算一个系统在多个阶段的生命周期可靠性时,需要分别计算每个阶段的组件和系统可靠性,然后将这些单个阶段的可靠性合并为一个整体的生命周期可靠性。本文展示了如何利用占空比将所有故障率调整(如环境、休眠等)与生命周期阶段结合起来,从而无需单独计算组件的故障率,并简化了系统的可靠性框图(RBD)。与基于阶段的模拟 RBD 相比,该方法允许使用分析 RBD 对多阶段生命周期进行可靠性分析。通过对具有多阶段生命周期的系统的两种方法的结果进行比较,证实将多种因素结合到占空比中,可以使用分析可靠性方框图来替代基于阶段的模拟可靠性方框图,但限制条件是在生命周期的每个阶段故障率都是恒定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信