Assessing Deep Learning Approaches for Time Series Analysis to Detect Uterine Sarcoma

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the performance of numerous deep-gaining knowledge of fashions for detecting Uterine Sarcoma via Time series evaluation. Uterine Sarcoma is a malignant tumor that influences the uterus and different parts of the woman's reproductive machine. Time collection analysis techniques have been broadly used in scientific fact mining, specifically for clinical records, because of their capability to capture temporal traits of the data. In this look, quite several deeps getting to know fashions which include Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), long brief-time period reminiscence (LSTM), and Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs), were evaluated at the MIMIC-III database-the use of metrics such as accuracy, precision and bear in mind. The results showed that the CNN had the highest accuracy (zero.99%) and precision (zero.75%) and did not forget (0.90%) in predicting Uterine Sarcoma when compared with the opposite models. This examination serves as a starting point for a similar investigation into the potential capabilities of deep mastering for detecting Uterine Sarcoma and other illnesses in medical statistics. This paper evaluates deep learning processes for time series evaluation to hit upon uterine sarcoma. The strategies used in this examination are Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). To assess the performance of the networks, the dataset from the yank university of Radiology (ACR) Uterine Sarcoma Imaging and Research Database changed used. The networks were evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Moreover, the RNNs and CNNs were compared to evaluate their performance. The results show that the CNN performs better than the RNN with an accuracy of ninety-seven. 50%, a sensitivity of 95.05%, and specificity of ninety-nine. 25%. It is steady with previous studies implementing deep learning techniques for medical photograph evaluation. The outcomes of this observation reveal that both RNN and CNN are appropriate for diagnosing uterine sarcoma and that the CNN version is more excellent and correct for the assignment to hand.