Comparison of naive Bayes and decision tree algorithms to assess the performance of Palembang City fire and Disaster management employees

Dewi Sartika, R. Gustriansyah
{"title":"Comparison of naive Bayes and decision tree algorithms to assess the performance of Palembang City fire and Disaster management employees","authors":"Dewi Sartika, R. Gustriansyah","doi":"10.37373/tekno.v11i1.843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The employee performance assessment at the Palembang City Fire and Disaster Management Service (DPKPB) is applied to other than the employee performance assessment implementation team based on the Decree of the Head of the Palembang City DPKPB Number 146 of 2021 concerning the employee performance assessment implementation team and awards for exemplary employees. Subjective assessments are avoided to obtain assessment results that are by the achievements of each employee. The application of data mining can be an alternative to avoid subjectivity in performance assessment. In this research, a comparison of the Naive Bayes and Decision Tree algorithms was carried out to assess the performance of Palembang City DPMPB employees. The results of further research will be used as an alternative solution in conducting performance assessments that are more objective than previous assessments. Both algorithms were evaluated for model performance using the Confusion Matrix. Based on the results of the evaluation carried out, it was stated that the Decision Tree algorithm had better accuracy, namely 91.74% compared to Naïve Bayes which had an accuracy of 88.99% with a test size of 0.4","PeriodicalId":518434,"journal":{"name":"TEKNOSAINS : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi dan Informatika","volume":"483 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEKNOSAINS : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi dan Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37373/tekno.v11i1.843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The employee performance assessment at the Palembang City Fire and Disaster Management Service (DPKPB) is applied to other than the employee performance assessment implementation team based on the Decree of the Head of the Palembang City DPKPB Number 146 of 2021 concerning the employee performance assessment implementation team and awards for exemplary employees. Subjective assessments are avoided to obtain assessment results that are by the achievements of each employee. The application of data mining can be an alternative to avoid subjectivity in performance assessment. In this research, a comparison of the Naive Bayes and Decision Tree algorithms was carried out to assess the performance of Palembang City DPMPB employees. The results of further research will be used as an alternative solution in conducting performance assessments that are more objective than previous assessments. Both algorithms were evaluated for model performance using the Confusion Matrix. Based on the results of the evaluation carried out, it was stated that the Decision Tree algorithm had better accuracy, namely 91.74% compared to Naïve Bayes which had an accuracy of 88.99% with a test size of 0.4
比较天真贝叶斯算法和决策树算法以评估巴伦邦市消防和灾害管理员工的绩效
根据 2021 年第 146 号巴伦邦市消防与灾害管理局局长令,巴伦邦市消防与灾害管理 局(DPKPB)的员工绩效评估适用于员工绩效评估执行小组以外的其他人员,涉及员工绩 效评估执行小组和模范员工奖励。避免主观评估,以获得由每个员工的成就决定的评估结果。数据挖掘的应用可以避免绩效评估中的主观性。在这项研究中,对 Naive Bayes 算法和决策树算法进行了比较,以评估巴伦邦市警察局员工的绩效。进一步研究的结果将被用作进行绩效评估的替代方案,比以往的评估更加客观。使用混淆矩阵对两种算法的模型性能进行了评估。根据评估结果,在测试规模为 0.4 的情况下,决策树算法的准确率为 91.74%,而奈夫贝叶算法的准确率为 88.99%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信