Comprehensive Energy Exergy Economic and Environmental Assessment of an Integrated Organic Rankine Cycle Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Absorption Chiller System Fueled by Steam Reformed Natural Gas

R. Sornumpol, P. P. Nimmanterdwong
{"title":"Comprehensive Energy Exergy Economic and Environmental Assessment of an Integrated Organic Rankine Cycle Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Absorption Chiller System Fueled by Steam Reformed Natural Gas","authors":"R. Sornumpol, P. P. Nimmanterdwong","doi":"10.2523/iptc-24616-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This research presents a thorough evaluation of an integrated system comprising a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC), Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), and Absorption Chiller (AC). The study employs ASPEN PLUS V10 to assess the system's energy, exergy, economic, and environmental performance. The Integrated SOFC-ORC-AC system offers trigeneration capabilities, generating electricity, cooling, and heating from a single fuel source. It demonstrates potential as an efficient and environmentally friendly energy generation method. The system can be fuelled by steam-reformed natural gas or renewable fuels like biogas or syngas. The SOFC, employing a solid electrolyte, facilitates an electrochemical reaction with hydrogen, producing electricity and heat. The exhaust gas further powers the ORC and AC units. The study builds a mathematical model, assuming steady-state, isothermal, and chemically equilibrated conditions. The SOFC and ORC simulations utilize the Peng Robinson model, while the LiBr absorption chiller employs the ELECNRTL property method for fluid thermodynamic properties. The SOFC electrical model was validated against real-world data, ensuring accuracy. The study also tested a single-effect LiBr absorption chiller, comparing results with experimental data. The operating pressure's effect on SOFC performance was evaluated, demonstrating reduced voltage losses and increased cell voltage and power density at higher pressures. Operating temperature elevation enhanced electrochemical reactions, resulting in higher cell voltage and power density, despite increased voltage losses. Augmenting the fuel utilization factor reduced voltage losses, leading to increased cell voltage and power density. The SOFC-ORC system efficiency peaked at 58.9% at the highest operating pressure, influenced by factors like compressor consumption and high fuel flow rate. Redirecting exhaust gas for waste heat recovery produced hot water, influencing the Coefficient of Performance (COP) of the LiBr absorption chiller. Mass flow rate had a smaller impact compared to hot water temperature. Exergy analysis revealed the SOFC's high efficiency (83.92%), while the steam turbine and LiBr absorption chiller demonstrated lower exergy efficiencies (70% and 32.6% respectively). Cost analysis indicated that the SOFC power plant was the most significant investment at 130,715 $, highlighting the long-term benefits of the integrated system in terms of high efficiency, low emissions, and fuel flexibility. This research offers a comprehensive assessment of the integrated SOFC-ORC-AC system, shedding light on its potential as an efficient and environmentally friendly energy generation solution. The study's findings contribute to the advancement of sustainable energy technologies, emphasizing the importance of trigeneration systems for future energy landscapes.","PeriodicalId":518539,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-24616-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research presents a thorough evaluation of an integrated system comprising a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC), Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), and Absorption Chiller (AC). The study employs ASPEN PLUS V10 to assess the system's energy, exergy, economic, and environmental performance. The Integrated SOFC-ORC-AC system offers trigeneration capabilities, generating electricity, cooling, and heating from a single fuel source. It demonstrates potential as an efficient and environmentally friendly energy generation method. The system can be fuelled by steam-reformed natural gas or renewable fuels like biogas or syngas. The SOFC, employing a solid electrolyte, facilitates an electrochemical reaction with hydrogen, producing electricity and heat. The exhaust gas further powers the ORC and AC units. The study builds a mathematical model, assuming steady-state, isothermal, and chemically equilibrated conditions. The SOFC and ORC simulations utilize the Peng Robinson model, while the LiBr absorption chiller employs the ELECNRTL property method for fluid thermodynamic properties. The SOFC electrical model was validated against real-world data, ensuring accuracy. The study also tested a single-effect LiBr absorption chiller, comparing results with experimental data. The operating pressure's effect on SOFC performance was evaluated, demonstrating reduced voltage losses and increased cell voltage and power density at higher pressures. Operating temperature elevation enhanced electrochemical reactions, resulting in higher cell voltage and power density, despite increased voltage losses. Augmenting the fuel utilization factor reduced voltage losses, leading to increased cell voltage and power density. The SOFC-ORC system efficiency peaked at 58.9% at the highest operating pressure, influenced by factors like compressor consumption and high fuel flow rate. Redirecting exhaust gas for waste heat recovery produced hot water, influencing the Coefficient of Performance (COP) of the LiBr absorption chiller. Mass flow rate had a smaller impact compared to hot water temperature. Exergy analysis revealed the SOFC's high efficiency (83.92%), while the steam turbine and LiBr absorption chiller demonstrated lower exergy efficiencies (70% and 32.6% respectively). Cost analysis indicated that the SOFC power plant was the most significant investment at 130,715 $, highlighting the long-term benefits of the integrated system in terms of high efficiency, low emissions, and fuel flexibility. This research offers a comprehensive assessment of the integrated SOFC-ORC-AC system, shedding light on its potential as an efficient and environmentally friendly energy generation solution. The study's findings contribute to the advancement of sustainable energy technologies, emphasizing the importance of trigeneration systems for future energy landscapes.
以蒸汽重整天然气为燃料的有机郎肯循环固体氧化物燃料电池和吸收式制冷机综合系统的综合能源、能量、经济和环境评估
本研究对由固体氧化物燃料电池 (SOFC)、有机郎肯循环 (ORC) 和吸收式制冷机 (AC) 组成的集成系统进行了全面评估。研究采用 ASPEN PLUS V10 评估系统的能量、放能、经济和环境性能。集成 SOFC-ORC-AC 系统具有三联供能力,可利用单一燃料发电、制冷和供热。它展示了作为一种高效、环保能源发电方法的潜力。该系统可采用蒸汽转化天然气或可再生燃料(如沼气或合成气)作为燃料。SOFC 采用固体电解质,促进与氢的电化学反应,产生电能和热能。废气进一步为 ORC 和交流发电机组提供动力。该研究建立了一个数学模型,假设条件为稳态、等温和化学平衡。SOFC 和 ORC 模拟采用了 Peng Robinson 模型,而锂溴吸收冷却器则采用了 ELECNRTL 属性法来计算流体热力学属性。SOFC 电气模型根据实际数据进行了验证,以确保准确性。研究还测试了单效锂硼吸收冷却器,并将结果与实验数据进行了比较。研究还评估了工作压力对 SOFC 性能的影响,结果表明,在较高压力下,电压损失减少,电池电压和功率密度增加。工作温度的升高增强了电化学反应,从而提高了电池电压和功率密度,尽管电压损耗有所增加。提高燃料利用系数可减少电压损失,从而提高电池电压和功率密度。受压缩机消耗和高燃料流速等因素的影响,SOFC-ORC 系统的效率在最高工作压力下达到了 58.9% 的峰值。将废气转用于废热回收产生热水,影响了锂溴吸收冷却器的性能系数(COP)。与热水温度相比,质量流量的影响较小。放能分析表明,SOFC 的效率高(83.92%),而蒸汽轮机和硼酸锂吸收式冷却器的放能效率较低(分别为 70% 和 32.6%)。成本分析表明,SOFC 发电厂的投资最大,为 130,715 美元,突出了集成系统在高效率、低排放和燃料灵活性方面的长期效益。本研究对 SOFC-ORC-AC 集成系统进行了全面评估,揭示了其作为高效环保能源发电解决方案的潜力。研究结果有助于推动可持续能源技术的发展,强调了三联供系统对未来能源格局的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信