Sulfate-Based Scales: Why Sulfate Ion Concentrations Matter

N. Almulhim, F. Alotaibi, M. Rafie, T. Alrufail
{"title":"Sulfate-Based Scales: Why Sulfate Ion Concentrations Matter","authors":"N. Almulhim, F. Alotaibi, M. Rafie, T. Alrufail","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23383-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Waterflooding is frequently applied in oil and gas reservoirs to sustain the reservoir downhole pressure and achieve a high rate of hydrocarbons production. The main challenge of water flooding is the potential to induce mineral scale depositions, especially when the injected water contains a high sulfate content. The objective of this paper is to determine the minimum threshold of sulfate contents present in the injected water that will not lead to mineral depositions through theoretical and experimental work.\n This study will showcase scale simulation and laboratory experiments involving multi-compositional water interactions with various sulfate concentrations ranging from 100 to 5,000 ppm. The study scheme starts by water preparation for the proposed brines, followed by geochemical analysis using Inductive-Coupled Plasma (ICP) to confirm the physical and chemical properties. Afterwards, scale risk assessment was performed using ScaleSoftPitzer™ to evaluate the scaling tendency. Finally, static bottle tests are conducted for a 48- hour testing period at temperatures ranging up to 260°F using HPHT aging cells at different mixing ratios.\n The scaling tendency assessment indicated a calcium sulfate and strontium sulfate precipitation when sulfate content exceeded 300 ppm. Although 5,000 ppm of sulfate content showed theoretically a low scaling index of gypsum and celestine, the scale mass was estimated to be nearly 2,500 and 500 mg/L, respectively at equivalent mixing ratio. Also, it was observed that as the sulfate content increases, the scale severity increases as well. The experimental compatibility tests reinforced the simulation findings, which showed similar result of inorganic sulfate-based scale precipitation that was observed after 48 hrs. testing time.\n The paper shares a system approach for water compatibility assessment and provides different scenarios using both simulations and water-water lab tests to confirm these predictions. It will also highlight how to mitigate the potential risk of scale and formation damage during water flooding.","PeriodicalId":518539,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","volume":"37 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23383-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waterflooding is frequently applied in oil and gas reservoirs to sustain the reservoir downhole pressure and achieve a high rate of hydrocarbons production. The main challenge of water flooding is the potential to induce mineral scale depositions, especially when the injected water contains a high sulfate content. The objective of this paper is to determine the minimum threshold of sulfate contents present in the injected water that will not lead to mineral depositions through theoretical and experimental work. This study will showcase scale simulation and laboratory experiments involving multi-compositional water interactions with various sulfate concentrations ranging from 100 to 5,000 ppm. The study scheme starts by water preparation for the proposed brines, followed by geochemical analysis using Inductive-Coupled Plasma (ICP) to confirm the physical and chemical properties. Afterwards, scale risk assessment was performed using ScaleSoftPitzer™ to evaluate the scaling tendency. Finally, static bottle tests are conducted for a 48- hour testing period at temperatures ranging up to 260°F using HPHT aging cells at different mixing ratios. The scaling tendency assessment indicated a calcium sulfate and strontium sulfate precipitation when sulfate content exceeded 300 ppm. Although 5,000 ppm of sulfate content showed theoretically a low scaling index of gypsum and celestine, the scale mass was estimated to be nearly 2,500 and 500 mg/L, respectively at equivalent mixing ratio. Also, it was observed that as the sulfate content increases, the scale severity increases as well. The experimental compatibility tests reinforced the simulation findings, which showed similar result of inorganic sulfate-based scale precipitation that was observed after 48 hrs. testing time. The paper shares a system approach for water compatibility assessment and provides different scenarios using both simulations and water-water lab tests to confirm these predictions. It will also highlight how to mitigate the potential risk of scale and formation damage during water flooding.
基于硫酸盐的天平:为什么硫酸根离子浓度很重要
油气藏中经常采用注水法来维持油气藏的井下压力,实现碳氢化合物的高生产率。水淹法面临的主要挑战是可能诱发矿垢沉积,尤其是当注入水中硫酸盐含量较高时。本文旨在通过理论和实验工作,确定注入水中不会导致矿物质沉积的硫酸盐含量最低阈值。本研究将展示规模模拟和实验室实验,涉及硫酸盐浓度从 100 到 5,000 ppm 不等的多成分水相互作用。研究方案首先为拟议的盐水进行水制备,然后使用电感耦合等离子体 (ICP) 进行地球化学分析,以确认物理和化学特性。然后,使用 ScaleSoftPitzer™ 进行结垢风险评估,以评价结垢趋势。最后,使用 HPHT 老化池以不同的混合比在高达 260°F 的温度下进行了 48 小时的静态瓶测试。结垢倾向评估表明,当硫酸盐含量超过 300 ppm 时,会出现硫酸钙和硫酸锶沉淀。虽然理论上 5,000 ppm 的硫酸盐含量显示石膏和天青石的结垢指数较低,但在同等混合比下,结垢质量估计分别接近 2,500 和 500 mg/L。此外,还观察到随着硫酸盐含量的增加,结垢的严重程度也会增加。实验兼容性测试证实了模拟结果,即在 48 小时测试时间后观察到类似的无机硫酸盐垢沉淀结果。本文分享了水兼容性评估的系统方法,并通过模拟和水-水实验室测试提供了不同的方案,以证实这些预测。论文还将强调如何降低水浸过程中水垢和形成损害的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信