Intermittent Pumping Optimization for Ultra-Low Permeability Reservoirs Sampling

Shiyue Wang, Zhaoya Fan, Guang Rao, Wei Xiang, Rui Qin, Jun Sun, Bonan Ren, Zhiwen Liu, Aydar Galiev, Amr Ismail
{"title":"Intermittent Pumping Optimization for Ultra-Low Permeability Reservoirs Sampling","authors":"Shiyue Wang, Zhaoya Fan, Guang Rao, Wei Xiang, Rui Qin, Jun Sun, Bonan Ren, Zhiwen Liu, Aydar Galiev, Amr Ismail","doi":"10.2523/iptc-24464-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n At present, the low-permeability reservoir fluid identification and formation dynamic evaluation mainly relies on the wireline formation test (WFT) technology in China Offshore exploration (Yang 2014 and Zhang 2018). However, because of low permeability, formation fluids cannot be continuously supplied while sampling, which makes it impossible to achieve continuous pumping during sampling operations. Therefore, there are problems such as low success rate and poor timeliness in the sampling operation of low to ultra-low permeability reservoirs. In some extreme cases, formation fluids samples cannot be obtained, which increases operating costs and exploration risks.\n As a spare and passive sampling method, intermittent pumping is often used for fluid identification and sampling in ultra-low permeability reservoirs. However, at present, there is no systematic analysis and demonstration of the application limit and related feasibility of intermittent pumping in the industry, nor the scientific optimization of intermittent pumping. The rationality of the intermittent pumping scheme affects the efficiency and sampling success rate. This paper aims to find out the influencing factors of intermittent pumping, and to form the optimal intermittent scheme to guide the operation. This paper uses the Modular Formation Dynamic Tester Tool (MDT) formation testing tool as the research object. First, the lower limit of MDT was analyzed. Second, through numerical simulation, the pressure recovery ratios (flowing pressure at the end of pump stop/formation pressure) of 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% were respectively defined; 8 in-, 15 in-, 20 in- invasion depths were simulated, which represent shallow, middle, and deep-mud filtrate invasion scenarios, respectively. Three samples of purity at 20%, 50%, and 80% were set as achievement goals; a total of 54 kinds of \"intermittent\" pumping operations were simulate, and the total operation time in the corresponding situations were obtained as well.\n During intermittent pumping, the continuous invasion of mud filtrate is the key factor affecting the pumping time and samples assurance. In this study, the mud filtrate invasion rate of different formations and mud systems was confirmed through laboratory and previous WFT data analysis. Moreover, this paper realized the world's first numerical simulation about intermittent pumping while there was mud filtrate continuous invasion. The intermittent pumping performance under different original invasion depths and different continuous invasion rates were also simulated and analyzed to provide guidance for the optimization of subsequent operations.\n Through the above studies, the optimized intermittent pumping method has been successfully applied to ultra-low to low permeability reservoir WFT sampling in multiple wells, which in the past could only be abandoned or it had to rely on advanced tools.","PeriodicalId":518539,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-24464-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, the low-permeability reservoir fluid identification and formation dynamic evaluation mainly relies on the wireline formation test (WFT) technology in China Offshore exploration (Yang 2014 and Zhang 2018). However, because of low permeability, formation fluids cannot be continuously supplied while sampling, which makes it impossible to achieve continuous pumping during sampling operations. Therefore, there are problems such as low success rate and poor timeliness in the sampling operation of low to ultra-low permeability reservoirs. In some extreme cases, formation fluids samples cannot be obtained, which increases operating costs and exploration risks. As a spare and passive sampling method, intermittent pumping is often used for fluid identification and sampling in ultra-low permeability reservoirs. However, at present, there is no systematic analysis and demonstration of the application limit and related feasibility of intermittent pumping in the industry, nor the scientific optimization of intermittent pumping. The rationality of the intermittent pumping scheme affects the efficiency and sampling success rate. This paper aims to find out the influencing factors of intermittent pumping, and to form the optimal intermittent scheme to guide the operation. This paper uses the Modular Formation Dynamic Tester Tool (MDT) formation testing tool as the research object. First, the lower limit of MDT was analyzed. Second, through numerical simulation, the pressure recovery ratios (flowing pressure at the end of pump stop/formation pressure) of 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% were respectively defined; 8 in-, 15 in-, 20 in- invasion depths were simulated, which represent shallow, middle, and deep-mud filtrate invasion scenarios, respectively. Three samples of purity at 20%, 50%, and 80% were set as achievement goals; a total of 54 kinds of "intermittent" pumping operations were simulate, and the total operation time in the corresponding situations were obtained as well. During intermittent pumping, the continuous invasion of mud filtrate is the key factor affecting the pumping time and samples assurance. In this study, the mud filtrate invasion rate of different formations and mud systems was confirmed through laboratory and previous WFT data analysis. Moreover, this paper realized the world's first numerical simulation about intermittent pumping while there was mud filtrate continuous invasion. The intermittent pumping performance under different original invasion depths and different continuous invasion rates were also simulated and analyzed to provide guidance for the optimization of subsequent operations. Through the above studies, the optimized intermittent pumping method has been successfully applied to ultra-low to low permeability reservoir WFT sampling in multiple wells, which in the past could only be abandoned or it had to rely on advanced tools.
超低渗透油藏间歇抽水优化取样
目前,在中国海洋勘探中,低渗透储层流体识别和地层动态评价主要依靠有线地层测试(WFT)技术(Yang 2014 和 Zhang 2018)。然而,由于低渗透性,地层流体在取样时无法连续供应,导致取样作业过程中无法实现连续抽水。因此,低渗透至超低渗透油藏的取样作业存在成功率低、时效性差等问题。在某些极端情况下,无法获得地层流体样本,从而增加了作业成本和勘探风险。作为一种备用和被动取样方法,间歇泵送通常被用于超低渗透油藏的流体识别和取样。然而,目前业界对间歇抽油机的应用极限和相关可行性还没有系统的分析论证,也没有对间歇抽油机进行科学优化。间歇抽水方案的合理性影响着抽水效率和采样成功率。本文旨在找出间歇抽水的影响因素,并形成最优间歇方案指导运行。本文以模块化地层动态测试工具(MDT)地层测试工具为研究对象。首先,分析了 MDT 的下限。其次,通过数值模拟,分别定义了 40%、50%、60%、70%、80%、90% 的压力恢复比(停泵结束时的流动压力/形成压力);模拟了 8 英寸、15 英寸、20 英寸的侵入深度,分别代表浅层、中层和深层泥浆滤液侵入情况。将纯度分别为 20%、50% 和 80% 的三个样本设定为实现目标;共模拟了 54 种 "间歇 "抽水操作,并得出了相应情况下的总操作时间。在间歇泵送过程中,泥浆滤液的持续侵入是影响泵送时间和样品保证的关键因素。本研究通过实验室和以往的 WFT 数据分析,确认了不同地层和泥浆系统的泥浆滤液侵入率。此外,本文还在世界上首次对泥浆滤液连续入侵时的间歇泵送进行了数值模拟。同时,还模拟分析了不同原始入侵深度和不同连续入侵速率下的间歇泵送性能,为后续操作的优化提供指导。通过上述研究,优化后的间歇抽油方法已成功应用于超低渗透至低渗透储层WFT多井取样,过去只能放弃或依靠先进工具进行取样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信