Utilization of Alderete’s Score Chart in Monitoring Post Anesthesia Patients: Are Nurses Utilizing the Monitoring Tool?

RA Odundo, Omondi, Omuga
{"title":"Utilization of Alderete’s Score Chart in Monitoring Post Anesthesia Patients: Are Nurses Utilizing the Monitoring Tool?","authors":"RA Odundo, Omondi, Omuga","doi":"10.18231/j.ijrimcr.2020.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anesthesia and surgical techniques have advanced leading to improvement of patients’ care after surgery. Alderete’s scoring tool was introduced in May 2018 at Kenyatta National Hospital to determine the suitability of patients for discharge to the post-surgical wards. Introduction of the monitoring tool was necessary due to the fact that patients were deteriorating after anesthesia after developing complications. There was also no standard monitoring tool that had been adopted. Alderete’s scoring system includes assessing a patient’s responsiveness, activity, respiration, blood pressure and oxygen saturation level. Since the introduction of the monitoring tool, no study has been done to assess its utilization in monitoring patients. Methods: A descriptive cross sectional study was conducted among nurses working in post anesthesia care unit of Kenyatta National Hospital. A total of 73 nurses were sampled for the study. Data was collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Results: The nurses comprised of 56% females and 45% males. The mean age of the participants was 38 years. There was no significant relationship between the use of Alderete’s score chart and level of training at confidence interval of p=0.210. However 85.7% of BScN trained were able to use the chart followed by 82.4% of KRPON trained nurses. This implied that those with higher training understood the importance of using the Alderete’s chart more than the lower level of training. There was significant statistical evidence at p=0.028 that the use of Alderete’s score chart depended on training of staffs and those who were trained were 1.488 times more likely to use the tool than those who were not trained. Conclusion: Alderete’s score chart was being used by nurses to monitor patients even though most of the nurses had not been trained on its utilization and therefore did not understand the components of the chart. Staff shortage and lack of supplies also hindered utilization of the monitoring tool.","PeriodicalId":518345,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Recent Innovations in Medicine and Clinical Research","volume":"77 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Recent Innovations in Medicine and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijrimcr.2020.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anesthesia and surgical techniques have advanced leading to improvement of patients’ care after surgery. Alderete’s scoring tool was introduced in May 2018 at Kenyatta National Hospital to determine the suitability of patients for discharge to the post-surgical wards. Introduction of the monitoring tool was necessary due to the fact that patients were deteriorating after anesthesia after developing complications. There was also no standard monitoring tool that had been adopted. Alderete’s scoring system includes assessing a patient’s responsiveness, activity, respiration, blood pressure and oxygen saturation level. Since the introduction of the monitoring tool, no study has been done to assess its utilization in monitoring patients. Methods: A descriptive cross sectional study was conducted among nurses working in post anesthesia care unit of Kenyatta National Hospital. A total of 73 nurses were sampled for the study. Data was collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Results: The nurses comprised of 56% females and 45% males. The mean age of the participants was 38 years. There was no significant relationship between the use of Alderete’s score chart and level of training at confidence interval of p=0.210. However 85.7% of BScN trained were able to use the chart followed by 82.4% of KRPON trained nurses. This implied that those with higher training understood the importance of using the Alderete’s chart more than the lower level of training. There was significant statistical evidence at p=0.028 that the use of Alderete’s score chart depended on training of staffs and those who were trained were 1.488 times more likely to use the tool than those who were not trained. Conclusion: Alderete’s score chart was being used by nurses to monitor patients even though most of the nurses had not been trained on its utilization and therefore did not understand the components of the chart. Staff shortage and lack of supplies also hindered utilization of the monitoring tool.
在监测麻醉后患者时使用 Alderete 评分表:护士是否在使用监测工具?
背景:麻醉和手术技术的进步改善了患者的术后护理。肯雅塔国立医院于2018年5月引入了Alderete评分工具,以确定患者是否适合出院前往术后病房。由于患者在麻醉后出现并发症,导致病情恶化,因此有必要引入该监测工具。此外,也没有标准的监测工具可供采用。Alderete 的评分系统包括评估病人的反应、活动、呼吸、血压和血氧饱和度水平。自该监测工具推出以来,还没有研究对其在监测患者方面的应用情况进行评估。研究方法在肯雅塔国立医院麻醉后护理部工作的护士中开展了一项描述性横断面研究。研究共抽取了 73 名护士。数据采用访谈者发放的调查问卷收集,并使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第 20 版进行分析。研究结果护士中女性占 56%,男性占 45%。参与者的平均年龄为 38 岁。Alderete 评分表的使用与培训水平之间没有明显关系,置信区间为 p=0.210。但是,85.7%接受过理学士培训的护士能够使用该评分表,其次是 82.4%接受过 KRPON 培训的护士。这意味着受过较高培训的护士比受过较低培训的护士更了解使用 Alderete 评分表的重要性。有明显的统计学证据(P=0.028)表明,Alderete 评分表的使用取决于员工的培训情况,受过培训的员工使用该工具的可能性是未受过培训员工的 1.488 倍。结论:尽管大多数护士没有接受过使用 Alderete 评分表的培训,因此不了解该评分表的组成部分,但护士们仍在使用 Alderete 评分表对病人进行监测。人员短缺和物资匮乏也阻碍了监测工具的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信