Long-term Coreflood Testing with Biopolymers—A Laboratory Investigation Showing How Return Permeability Improves From 0 to 100 Percent by Getting a Critical Parameter Right

S. Howard, Montogomery, Tx
{"title":"Long-term Coreflood Testing with Biopolymers—A Laboratory Investigation Showing How Return Permeability Improves From 0 to 100 Percent by Getting a Critical Parameter Right","authors":"S. Howard, Montogomery, Tx","doi":"10.2118/217909-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A series of long-term coreflood tests has shown the importance of considering the self-breaking rate of biopolymers when designing coreflood tests of low-solids and solids-free brine-based drilling and completion fluids that naturally contaminate the core plug with biopolymers during testing.\n The tests were conducted with a solids-free potassium formate brine–based reservoir drilling fluid, formulated with xanthan gum and starch, which when exposed to overbalanced pressure, invaded deep into the core plug. The coreflood test simulated filtrate invasion into a water-saturated formation while drilling an injection well. In this scenario the core plug was initially 100% saturated with formation water, and return permeability was measured by injecting formation water through the core in the same direction as the test fluid filtrate invasion.\n Testing was conducted at two temperatures, 121 and 149°C (250 and 300°F). At both test temperatures there was a very good correlation between the cleanup or permeability recovery rate of the core plug and the biopolymer self-breaking rates, which had been measured in an earlier study. Due to the low cleanup rate at the lowest temperature, this test was terminated as soon as the cleanup rate was fully established, and the testing was continued at the higher temperature until the permeability had reached close to 100% of its initial value.\n The initial 49-hours cleanup with formation water at 121°C (250°F) resulted in a return permeability to formation water of only 3.8%, explaining why laboratory coreflood tests with low-solids/solids-free brine-based drilling and completion fluids containing biopolymeric additives are generally unable to reproduce or predict the excellent well performance the same fluids deliver in the field after days, weeks, or months of steady clean-up.\n The results also give us useful insights into what to expect when such fluids are used to drill injection wells. Although the biopolymer self-breaking rate is much higher in the low-salinity injection water, it takes time for biopolymers to break down enough in the protective ionic environment of the formate brine for the filtrate to be diluted and displaced locally by the flow of injection water.\n The desire to reduce fluid screening and qualification costs unfortunately often means that reservoir drilling and completion fluid selection decisions are based on the results of short-term coreflood tests. This may be the correct procedure for fluids that cause permanent intractable damage from solids plugging. However, for solids-free or low-solids fluids containing self-breaking biopolymers, relying on such short-term tests can mean that the wrong fluid selection decisions are made.","PeriodicalId":518997,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, February 21, 2024","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, February 21, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217909-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A series of long-term coreflood tests has shown the importance of considering the self-breaking rate of biopolymers when designing coreflood tests of low-solids and solids-free brine-based drilling and completion fluids that naturally contaminate the core plug with biopolymers during testing. The tests were conducted with a solids-free potassium formate brine–based reservoir drilling fluid, formulated with xanthan gum and starch, which when exposed to overbalanced pressure, invaded deep into the core plug. The coreflood test simulated filtrate invasion into a water-saturated formation while drilling an injection well. In this scenario the core plug was initially 100% saturated with formation water, and return permeability was measured by injecting formation water through the core in the same direction as the test fluid filtrate invasion. Testing was conducted at two temperatures, 121 and 149°C (250 and 300°F). At both test temperatures there was a very good correlation between the cleanup or permeability recovery rate of the core plug and the biopolymer self-breaking rates, which had been measured in an earlier study. Due to the low cleanup rate at the lowest temperature, this test was terminated as soon as the cleanup rate was fully established, and the testing was continued at the higher temperature until the permeability had reached close to 100% of its initial value. The initial 49-hours cleanup with formation water at 121°C (250°F) resulted in a return permeability to formation water of only 3.8%, explaining why laboratory coreflood tests with low-solids/solids-free brine-based drilling and completion fluids containing biopolymeric additives are generally unable to reproduce or predict the excellent well performance the same fluids deliver in the field after days, weeks, or months of steady clean-up. The results also give us useful insights into what to expect when such fluids are used to drill injection wells. Although the biopolymer self-breaking rate is much higher in the low-salinity injection water, it takes time for biopolymers to break down enough in the protective ionic environment of the formate brine for the filtrate to be diluted and displaced locally by the flow of injection water. The desire to reduce fluid screening and qualification costs unfortunately often means that reservoir drilling and completion fluid selection decisions are based on the results of short-term coreflood tests. This may be the correct procedure for fluids that cause permanent intractable damage from solids plugging. However, for solids-free or low-solids fluids containing self-breaking biopolymers, relying on such short-term tests can mean that the wrong fluid selection decisions are made.
使用生物聚合物进行长期岩心注水测试--实验室调查显示,如何通过正确处理关键参数,将回流渗透率从 0% 提高到 100%
一系列长期岩心充水试验表明,在设计低固体和无固体盐基钻井液和完井液的岩心充水试验时,必须考虑生物聚合物的自破碎率,因为生物聚合物会在试验过程中自然污染岩心塞。测试使用了一种无固体甲酸钾盐基储层钻井液,该钻井液由黄原胶和淀粉配制而成,当暴露在过平衡压力下时,黄原胶和淀粉会侵入岩心塞深处。岩心注水试验模拟了在钻注水井时,滤液侵入水饱和地层的情况。在这种情况下,岩心塞最初100%饱和地层水,通过向岩心注入与测试流体滤液入侵方向相同的地层水来测量回流渗透率。测试在两种温度下进行:121 和 149°C(250 和 300°F)。在这两个测试温度下,岩心堵塞的清理率或渗透率恢复率与生物聚合物自破裂率之间有很好的相关性,生物聚合物自破裂率是在早期研究中测得的。由于最低温度下的清理率较低,因此在清理率完全确定后立即终止了测试,并在较高温度下继续进行测试,直到渗透率接近其初始值的 100%。最初在121°C(250°F)下用地层水清理49小时后,地层水的返渗透率仅为3.8%,这就解释了为什么使用含有生物聚合物添加剂的低固体/无溶剂盐基钻井液和完井液进行的实验室岩心注水试验通常无法再现或预测相同的钻井液在经过数天、数周或数月的稳定清理后在现场所表现出的优异油井性能。这些结果也为我们提供了有益的启示,使我们了解到在使用此类液体钻注水井时应注意的事项。虽然生物聚合物在低盐度注入水中的自分解率要高得多,但生物聚合物需要一定时间才能在甲酸盐水的离子保护环境中充分分解,从而使滤液被注入水流稀释和局部置换。不幸的是,降低流体筛选和鉴定成本的愿望往往意味着储层钻井和完井流体的选择决定是基于短期岩心充注试验的结果。对于因固体堵塞而造成永久性难以解决的损害的流体来说,这种方法可能是正确的。然而,对于含有自破壁生物聚合物的无固体或低固体流体来说,依靠这种短期试验可能意味着做出了错误的流体选择决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信