Deterministic ideas about man in the philosophical works of A.L. Chizhevsky: scientific and religious aspects

Ekaterina Evgen'evna Zvonova
{"title":"Deterministic ideas about man in the philosophical works of A.L. Chizhevsky: scientific and religious aspects","authors":"Ekaterina Evgen'evna Zvonova","doi":"10.25136/2409-8728.2024.1.69505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The subject of the study is the scientific and religious aspects of the anthropological determinism of the philosophical works of A.L. Chizhevsky, the object is the deterministic views of the cosmist on man. The author examines in detail the \"dialectical\" anthropological determinism compatible with the freedom of human will of the \"Basic principle of the universe\" and the roughly deterministic approach to man of the \"Electronic Theory and genesis of forms\". Special attention is paid to the study of the question concerning the validity of both types of deterministic views in the context of global evolutionism, as well as Christianity and Vedantist ideas about the \"cosmic game\" correlated with the phenomenon of cosmic consciousness. The purpose of the work is to explicate the question of the peculiarities of the correlation of scientific and religious worldviews in Russian cosmism, based on which it is possible to identify the grounds for a productive dialogue between science and religion.  The following methods were used: analysis of textual sources (including manuscripts of the 1703 fund of the Archive of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Federation), comparative analysis, analysis, synthesis, generalization, induction and deduction, historical method. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the identification of two varieties of anthropological determinism characterizing the philosophical works of A.L. Chizhevsky, and the study of their compliance with scientific and religious views. The main conclusions of the study are the following judgments: 1) \"dialectical\" anthropological determinism seems legitimate, in contrast to the roughly deterministic approach to man; 2) an assessment of the correspondence of the two mentioned varieties of anthropological determinism to scientific and religious views allows us to draw the same conclusion about their legality. A similar vision of a complex phenomenon in scientific and religious discourses indicates the presence of points of contact between them. The similarities and differences between science and religion should become the basis for solving the urgent problem of building a constructive dialogue between these forms of human culture.\n","PeriodicalId":509672,"journal":{"name":"Философская мысль","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Философская мысль","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2024.1.69505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the study is the scientific and religious aspects of the anthropological determinism of the philosophical works of A.L. Chizhevsky, the object is the deterministic views of the cosmist on man. The author examines in detail the "dialectical" anthropological determinism compatible with the freedom of human will of the "Basic principle of the universe" and the roughly deterministic approach to man of the "Electronic Theory and genesis of forms". Special attention is paid to the study of the question concerning the validity of both types of deterministic views in the context of global evolutionism, as well as Christianity and Vedantist ideas about the "cosmic game" correlated with the phenomenon of cosmic consciousness. The purpose of the work is to explicate the question of the peculiarities of the correlation of scientific and religious worldviews in Russian cosmism, based on which it is possible to identify the grounds for a productive dialogue between science and religion.  The following methods were used: analysis of textual sources (including manuscripts of the 1703 fund of the Archive of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Federation), comparative analysis, analysis, synthesis, generalization, induction and deduction, historical method. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the identification of two varieties of anthropological determinism characterizing the philosophical works of A.L. Chizhevsky, and the study of their compliance with scientific and religious views. The main conclusions of the study are the following judgments: 1) "dialectical" anthropological determinism seems legitimate, in contrast to the roughly deterministic approach to man; 2) an assessment of the correspondence of the two mentioned varieties of anthropological determinism to scientific and religious views allows us to draw the same conclusion about their legality. A similar vision of a complex phenomenon in scientific and religious discourses indicates the presence of points of contact between them. The similarities and differences between science and religion should become the basis for solving the urgent problem of building a constructive dialogue between these forms of human culture.
阿-列-奇热夫斯基哲学著作中关于人的决定论思想:科学和宗教方面
研究主题是阿-列-契热夫斯基哲学著作中人类学决定论的科学和宗教方面,研究对象是这位宇宙主义者关于人的决定论观点。作者详细研究了 "宇宙基本原理 "中与人的意志自由相适应的 "辩证 "人类学决定论,以及 "电子理论和形式的起源 "中对人的粗略决定论。作品特别关注研究了在全球进化论背景下这两种决定论观点的有效性问题,以及基督教和吠檀多派关于与宇宙意识现象相关的 "宇宙游戏 "的观点。本著作的目的是阐释俄罗斯宇宙论中科学世界观与宗教世界观相关性的特殊性问题,在此基础上确定科学与宗教之间富有成效的对话的基础。 文章采用了以下方法:分析文本资料(包括俄罗斯联邦科学院档案馆 1703 年基金的手稿)、比较分析、分析、综合、概括、归纳和演绎、历史方法。文章的科学新颖性在于确定了阿-列-奇热夫斯基哲学著作中的两种人类学决定论特征,并研究了它们是否符合科学和宗教观点。研究的主要结论是以下判断:1)"辩证的 "人类学决定论似乎是合法的,这与对人的粗略决定论方法形成鲜明对比;2)对上述两种人类学决定论与科学和宗教观点的对应关系进行评估,可以得出关于其合法性的相同结论。科学和宗教论述对复杂现象的相似看法表明,它们之间存在着联系点。科学与宗教之间的异同应成为解决在这些人类文化形式之间建立建设性对话这一紧迫问题的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信