Rectal cancer complete responders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: when to spare their organs?

Ahmed M. Saleh, Mohamed Mazloum, Abdelsalam Ismail, Doaa Emara
{"title":"Rectal cancer complete responders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: when to spare their organs?","authors":"Ahmed M. Saleh, Mohamed Mazloum, Abdelsalam Ismail, Doaa Emara","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_235_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The aim of this study is to identify possible clinical predictors of complete response after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients.\n \n \n \n This study included 40 LARC patients (16 males and 24 females) who received NAT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) in the period between August 2020 and February 2023. Two different NAT protocols were used; long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or consolidation total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) according to the decision of the multidisciplinary team (MDT). Reassessment of response is done after completion of radiotherapy by digital rectal examination (DRE), proctoscopy, and pelvic MRI to define complete responders. All these responders received TME and were classified according to their pathology specimens into the pathological complete response group (pCR=22 patients) and nonpathological complete response group (non-pCR=18 patients). Statistical analyses were performed to compare the two groups and identify clinical factors associated with pCR.\n \n \n \n The significant clinical predictors of pCR in the univariate analysis were patients’ age, preneoadjuvant carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and preneoadjuvant lymphocytic ratio (P=0.030, 0.007, and 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, lymphocytic ratio was the only independent predictor for pCR (P=0.017). Lymphocytic ratio (>26%) has high diagnostic performance for predicting pCR, while age (>50 years) and normal CEA (≤5 ng/ml) have lower diagnostic performance which can be much improved when both are used in combination to predict pCR.\n \n \n \n Preneoadjuvant lymphocytic ratio and the combined use of age and preneoadjuvant CEA level are significant predictors of pCR, this may help the MDT select rectal cancer patients with complete clinical response (cCR), who are candidates for organ preserving strategies, to spare their rectum and avoid unnecessary radical surgeries.\n","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_235_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify possible clinical predictors of complete response after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This study included 40 LARC patients (16 males and 24 females) who received NAT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) in the period between August 2020 and February 2023. Two different NAT protocols were used; long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or consolidation total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) according to the decision of the multidisciplinary team (MDT). Reassessment of response is done after completion of radiotherapy by digital rectal examination (DRE), proctoscopy, and pelvic MRI to define complete responders. All these responders received TME and were classified according to their pathology specimens into the pathological complete response group (pCR=22 patients) and nonpathological complete response group (non-pCR=18 patients). Statistical analyses were performed to compare the two groups and identify clinical factors associated with pCR. The significant clinical predictors of pCR in the univariate analysis were patients’ age, preneoadjuvant carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and preneoadjuvant lymphocytic ratio (P=0.030, 0.007, and 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, lymphocytic ratio was the only independent predictor for pCR (P=0.017). Lymphocytic ratio (>26%) has high diagnostic performance for predicting pCR, while age (>50 years) and normal CEA (≤5 ng/ml) have lower diagnostic performance which can be much improved when both are used in combination to predict pCR. Preneoadjuvant lymphocytic ratio and the combined use of age and preneoadjuvant CEA level are significant predictors of pCR, this may help the MDT select rectal cancer patients with complete clinical response (cCR), who are candidates for organ preserving strategies, to spare their rectum and avoid unnecessary radical surgeries.
新辅助化疗后完全应答的直肠癌患者:何时保留其器官?
本研究旨在确定局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者接受新辅助治疗(NAT)后完全缓解的可能临床预测因素。 本研究纳入了 40 名局部晚期直肠癌患者(男性 16 人,女性 24 人),他们在 2020 年 8 月至 2023 年 2 月期间接受了新辅助治疗,随后进行了全直肠系膜切除术(TME)。根据多学科团队(MDT)的决定,采用了两种不同的 NAT 方案:长程化放疗(LCRT)或巩固性全新辅助治疗(TNT)。放疗结束后,通过数字直肠镜检查(DRE)、直肠镜检查和盆腔磁共振成像重新评估反应,以确定完全反应者。所有这些应答者都接受了TME治疗,并根据病理标本分为病理完全应答组(pCR=22例患者)和非病理完全应答组(non-pathological complete response=18例患者)。研究人员对两组患者进行了统计分析比较,并确定了与病理完全反应相关的临床因素。 在单变量分析中,pCR的重要临床预测因素是患者的年龄、新辅助治疗前癌胚抗原(CEA)水平和新辅助治疗前淋巴细胞比率(P分别为0.030、0.007和0.001)。在多变量分析中,淋巴细胞比率是预测 pCR 的唯一独立指标(P=0.017)。淋巴细胞比值(>26%)对预测 pCR 有较高的诊断性能,而年龄(>50 岁)和正常 CEA(≤5 ng/ml)的诊断性能较低,如果两者结合使用来预测 pCR,诊断性能会大大提高。 辅助治疗前淋巴细胞比值以及年龄和辅助治疗前CEA水平的联合使用是预测pCR的重要指标,这可能有助于MDT选择临床完全反应(cCR)的直肠癌患者,这些患者适合采取保留器官的策略,以保留直肠,避免不必要的根治性手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信