Assessing text comprehension proficiency: Indonesian higher education students vs ChatGPT

Q1 Arts and Humanities
XLinguae Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.04
Juanda, Iswan Afandi
{"title":"Assessing text comprehension proficiency: Indonesian higher education students vs ChatGPT","authors":"Juanda, Iswan Afandi","doi":"10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AI has developed rapidly. However, AI research in applied linguistics in the field of language education in Indonesia still needs to be expanded to reading and writing skills. This research aims to explore students' skills in writing summaries and understanding the historical theme of the development of the Indonesian language with AI based on gender and university aspects. The quantitative method uses descriptive statistical analysis techniques, independent sample t-test, and Welch One-Way ANOVA. The research sample was 288 students from Makassar State University, Timor University, and Makassar Health Polytechnic. The results show that ChatGPT is significantly better at reprocessing text than students based on the aspects measured. ChatGPT outperforms almost every aspect of the assessment. However, in the MCT_Score aspect, the average for Universitas Negeri Makassar students is slightly higher than ChatGPT and the other two universities. Meanwhile, the Makassar Health Polytechnic almost matches the average ChatGPT score. Apart from that, the Universitas Timor average seems significantly different, with a score range of only 6.00 – 7.00. This research contributes to developing the Indonesian curriculum using Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology. The government can use these findings as a basis for making better policies to improve the quality of education. This research implies that Indonesian students have a gap in understanding texts compared to ChatGPT. The first implication is the need to revise and develop the educational curriculum. Therefore, future research can examine text comprehension abilities in more specific contexts, such as scientific texts, journalism, literature, or specific scientific disciplines. It can provide more detailed insight into students' strategies for overcoming difficulties in understanding texts. In addition, future research will be conducted on the broader impact of using Artificial Intelligence technology in language education on the development of student text comprehension and the potential social and ethical impacts.","PeriodicalId":53512,"journal":{"name":"XLinguae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"XLinguae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI has developed rapidly. However, AI research in applied linguistics in the field of language education in Indonesia still needs to be expanded to reading and writing skills. This research aims to explore students' skills in writing summaries and understanding the historical theme of the development of the Indonesian language with AI based on gender and university aspects. The quantitative method uses descriptive statistical analysis techniques, independent sample t-test, and Welch One-Way ANOVA. The research sample was 288 students from Makassar State University, Timor University, and Makassar Health Polytechnic. The results show that ChatGPT is significantly better at reprocessing text than students based on the aspects measured. ChatGPT outperforms almost every aspect of the assessment. However, in the MCT_Score aspect, the average for Universitas Negeri Makassar students is slightly higher than ChatGPT and the other two universities. Meanwhile, the Makassar Health Polytechnic almost matches the average ChatGPT score. Apart from that, the Universitas Timor average seems significantly different, with a score range of only 6.00 – 7.00. This research contributes to developing the Indonesian curriculum using Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology. The government can use these findings as a basis for making better policies to improve the quality of education. This research implies that Indonesian students have a gap in understanding texts compared to ChatGPT. The first implication is the need to revise and develop the educational curriculum. Therefore, future research can examine text comprehension abilities in more specific contexts, such as scientific texts, journalism, literature, or specific scientific disciplines. It can provide more detailed insight into students' strategies for overcoming difficulties in understanding texts. In addition, future research will be conducted on the broader impact of using Artificial Intelligence technology in language education on the development of student text comprehension and the potential social and ethical impacts.
评估文本理解能力:印度尼西亚高校学生与 ChatGPT
人工智能发展迅速。然而,印尼语言教育领域应用语言学方面的人工智能研究仍需扩展到阅读和写作技能。本研究旨在从性别和大学两个方面探讨学生撰写摘要的技能,以及利用人工智能理解印尼语言发展的历史主题。定量方法采用描述性统计分析技术、独立样本 t 检验和韦尔奇单向方差分析。研究样本为来自望加锡国立大学、帝汶大学和望加锡卫生理工学院的 288 名学生。结果表明,从测量的各个方面来看,ChatGPT 在文本再处理方面明显优于学生。ChatGPT 在评估的几乎每个方面都优于学生。然而,在 MCT_Score 方面,马卡萨国立大学学生的平均成绩略高于 ChatGPT 和其他两所大学。同时,望加锡健康理工学院几乎与 ChatGPT 的平均分持平。除此之外,帝汶大学的平均分似乎相差甚远,仅在 6.00-7.00 之间。这项研究有助于利用人工智能(AI)技术开发印度尼西亚课程。政府可以这些研究结果为基础,制定更好的政策,提高教育质量。这项研究表明,与 ChatGPT 相比,印尼学生在理解文本方面存在差距。第一个含义是需要修订和发展教育课程。因此,未来的研究可以在更具体的语境中考察文本理解能力,如科学文本、新闻、文学或特定的科学学科。这样可以更详细地了解学生克服文本理解困难的策略。此外,未来的研究还将涉及在语言教育中使用人工智能技术对学生文本理解能力发展的更广泛影响,以及潜在的社会和伦理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
XLinguae
XLinguae Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The XLinguae (ISSN 2453-711X online, ISSN 1337-8384 print) is the European scientific language double-blind peer-reviewed journal covering philosophy, linguistics, applied linguistics fields on Modern European languages. It is published by the Slovenská Vzdelávacia a Obstarávacia s.r.o., Nitra, with frequency of 4 issues per year: January + Special Issue, April, June, and October. The main objective of the Journal is to promote and sustain the language and culture diversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信